Analysis of Cost-Effectiveness of Employment Transportation Services

被引:1
|
作者
Thakuriah, Piyushimita [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Urban Planning & Policy, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
WELFARE-REFORM; TRANSIT; PRODUCTIVITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3141/2217-07
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The author examined cost-effectiveness of employment transportation (ET) services funded by the Job Access and Reverse Commute program of FTA in 2002. These services transport low-wage workers to jobs. The author presented multiple sources of primary and administrative data on users and programs in 23 ET sites. ET cost per ride measures were compared with cost per ride measures of transit services that were operating in the same area (called peer transit services). A cost per user per year was estimated to determine the level of transportation investments on the mobility of low-wage workers. On a per ride basis, ET services cost more to deliver than did peer transit services, but a wide variation existed in the level of investments and subsidies among different types of users, areas, and types of service. The median estimated cost per ET service user per year was similar to the annual investment per recipient by several social and human services and workforce development programs that supported low-income individuals to achieve improved economic outcomes. ET annual expenditures were the greatest for low-wage individuals who were traveling to work and less so for low-income individuals who were traveling to job training, to look for jobs, or to shop and make other discretionary trips. Implications are drawn for human services transportation coordination and for data and reporting requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 62
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE ANATOMY OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    PETERSON, RD
    [J]. EVALUATION REVIEW, 1986, 10 (01) : 29 - 44
  • [32] WHAT IS COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    EVANS, DB
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1990, 153 : S7 - S9
  • [33] AMTRAK - COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    MULVEY, FP
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 1979, 13 (05) : 329 - 344
  • [34] Medicare and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Neumann, PJ
    Rosen, AB
    Weinstein, MC
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (14): : 1516 - 1522
  • [35] ANALYSIS OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PACS
    HILSENRATH, PE
    SMITH, WL
    BERBAUM, KS
    FRANKEN, EA
    OWEN, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 156 (01) : 177 - 180
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis of paclitaxel
    Eandi, Mario
    [J]. FARMECONOMIA-HEALTH ECONOMICS AND THERAPEUTIC PATHWAYS, 2006, 7 (02) : 97 - 117
  • [37] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS - A REVIEW
    RUTIGLIANO, MJ
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1995, 37 (03) : 436 - 443
  • [38] Overview of Cost-effectiveness Analysis
    Sanders, Gillian D.
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Basu, Anirban
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (14): : 1400 - 1401
  • [39] THE ROAD TO COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    KLARMAN, HE
    [J]. MILBANK MEMORIAL FUND QUARTERLY-HEALTH AND SOCIETY, 1982, 60 (04): : 585 - 603
  • [40] DECISION AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS
    MARLEY, DS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 1990, 30 (02): : 233 - &