Allograft Rejection in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

被引:10
|
作者
Healy, Aaron H.
Mason, Nathan O.
Hammond, M. Elizabeth
Reid, Bruce B.
Clayson, Stephen E.
Drakos, Stavros G.
Kfoury, Abdallah G.
Patel, Amit N.
Bull, David A.
Budge, Deborah
Alharethi, Rami A.
Bader, Feras M.
Gilbert, Edward M.
Stehlik, Josef
Selzman, Craig H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2011年 / 92卷 / 05期
关键词
MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; END-ORGAN FUNCTION; PULSATILE-FLOW; HEARTMATE-II; BRIDGE; TRANSPLANTATION; IMPLANTATION; DYSTROPHIN; FAILURE; PUMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.119
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Both pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) successfully provide patients a bridge to transplantation. Some data suggest that continuous-flow pumps increase the risk of allograft rejection, contributing to posttransplantation morbidity and mortality. We sought to analyze the relationship between LVAD flow characteristics and subsequent allograft rejection in bridge to transplant (BTT) patients. Methods. Patients with LVADs from the UTAH Transplant Affiliated Hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Rejection was determined pathologically according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation revised cardiac allograft rejection scale. Multimodal statistical analyses were applied. Results. Of 1,076 patients who underwent transplantation over a 26-year period, 151 had LVADs. Of these, 111 (77 pulsatile flow, 34 continuous flow) patients had pathologic data available. There was no difference in overall rejection (grades 1R to 3R) between the pulsatile-flow LVAD and continuous-flow LVAD groups (2.00 +/- 1.43 versus 1.50 +/- 1.16 episodes/year; p = 0.076.) Patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs had more clinically relevant (grades 2R to 3R) rejection than did patients with continuous-flow LVADs (0.49 +/- 0.72 versus 0.12 +/- 0.33 episodes/year; p < 0.001). There was no survival difference at 1 year (p = 0.920) or 4 years (p = 0.721) after transplantation. Conclusions. Patients with continuous-flow LVADs have similar overall rejection rates and a reduced rate of clinically relevant rejection compared with patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs during the first year after transplantation. Although there is theoretical concern that nonphysiologic, nonpulsatile flow could alter the neurohormonal profile of patients in heart failure, we are encouraged that the type of LVAD circulation does not influence posttransplantation allograft survival. (Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1601-7) (C) 2011 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1607
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Amer S.
    Shah P.
    Hassan S.
    [J]. Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 8 (2) : 63 - 67
  • [22] Perils of bridge to transplantation in patients on continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Moazami, Nader
    Reyentovich, Alex
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (04): : 481 - 482
  • [23] Effect of Pretransplant Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Cellular and Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Subsequent Allograft Outcomes
    Nestorovic, Emilija M.
    Grupper, Avishay
    Joyce, Lyle D.
    Milic, Natasa M.
    Stulak, John M.
    Edwards, Brooks S.
    Pereira, Naveen L.
    Daly, Richard C.
    Kushwaha, Sudhir S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 119 (03): : 452 - 456
  • [24] Factor Xa inhibitors in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Parikh, Vishal Y.
    Parikh, Umang M.
    Moctezuma-Ramirez, Angel
    Lamba, Harveen K.
    George, Joggy K.
    Fedson, Savitri
    Nair, Ajith P.
    Frazier, O. H.
    Delgado, Reynolds M.
    [J]. GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 68 (11) : 1278 - 1284
  • [25] Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Woldendorp, K. D.
    Gupta, S.
    Markey, P.
    Robson, D.
    Dhital, K.
    Hayward, C. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S91 - S92
  • [26] Prevalence of Cerebral Microbleeds in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Yoshioka, Daisuke
    Okazaki, Shuhei
    Toda, Koichi
    Murase, Sho
    Saito, Shunsuke
    Domae, Keitaro
    Miyagawa, Shigeru
    Yoshikawa, Yasushi
    Daimon, Takashi
    Sakaguchi, Manabu
    Sawa, Yoshiki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (09):
  • [27] Neurologic Events in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Kadakkal, Ajay
    Najjar, Samer S.
    [J]. CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2018, 36 (04) : 531 - +
  • [28] Physiologic effects of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Healy, Aaron H.
    McKellar, Stephen H.
    Drakos, Stavros G.
    Koliopoulou, Antigoni
    Stehlik, Josef
    Selzman, Craig H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 202 (02) : 363 - 371
  • [29] A Decade of Experience With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    John, Ranjit
    Holley, Christopher T.
    Eckman, Peter
    Roy, Samit S.
    Cogswell, Rebecca
    Harvey, Laura
    Shumway, Sara
    Liao, Kenneth
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 28 (02) : 363 - 374
  • [30] Metabolic Dysfunction in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices Patients and Outcomes
    Nguyen, Ann B.
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Besser, Stephanie
    Rodgers, Daniel
    Chung, Ben
    Raikhelkar, Jayant
    Kalantari, Sara
    Smith, Bryan
    Sarswat, Nitasha
    LaBuhn, Colleen
    Jeevanandam, Valluvan
    Kim, Gene
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2019, 8 (22):