Allograft Rejection in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

被引:10
|
作者
Healy, Aaron H.
Mason, Nathan O.
Hammond, M. Elizabeth
Reid, Bruce B.
Clayson, Stephen E.
Drakos, Stavros G.
Kfoury, Abdallah G.
Patel, Amit N.
Bull, David A.
Budge, Deborah
Alharethi, Rami A.
Bader, Feras M.
Gilbert, Edward M.
Stehlik, Josef
Selzman, Craig H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Div Cardiothorac Surg, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 2011年 / 92卷 / 05期
关键词
MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; END-ORGAN FUNCTION; PULSATILE-FLOW; HEARTMATE-II; BRIDGE; TRANSPLANTATION; IMPLANTATION; DYSTROPHIN; FAILURE; PUMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.119
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background. Both pulsatile-flow and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) successfully provide patients a bridge to transplantation. Some data suggest that continuous-flow pumps increase the risk of allograft rejection, contributing to posttransplantation morbidity and mortality. We sought to analyze the relationship between LVAD flow characteristics and subsequent allograft rejection in bridge to transplant (BTT) patients. Methods. Patients with LVADs from the UTAH Transplant Affiliated Hospitals were retrospectively analyzed. Rejection was determined pathologically according to the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation revised cardiac allograft rejection scale. Multimodal statistical analyses were applied. Results. Of 1,076 patients who underwent transplantation over a 26-year period, 151 had LVADs. Of these, 111 (77 pulsatile flow, 34 continuous flow) patients had pathologic data available. There was no difference in overall rejection (grades 1R to 3R) between the pulsatile-flow LVAD and continuous-flow LVAD groups (2.00 +/- 1.43 versus 1.50 +/- 1.16 episodes/year; p = 0.076.) Patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs had more clinically relevant (grades 2R to 3R) rejection than did patients with continuous-flow LVADs (0.49 +/- 0.72 versus 0.12 +/- 0.33 episodes/year; p < 0.001). There was no survival difference at 1 year (p = 0.920) or 4 years (p = 0.721) after transplantation. Conclusions. Patients with continuous-flow LVADs have similar overall rejection rates and a reduced rate of clinically relevant rejection compared with patients with pulsatile-flow LVADs during the first year after transplantation. Although there is theoretical concern that nonphysiologic, nonpulsatile flow could alter the neurohormonal profile of patients in heart failure, we are encouraged that the type of LVAD circulation does not influence posttransplantation allograft survival. (Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:1601-7) (C) 2011 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1607
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Allograft Rejection in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices DISCUSSION
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    Dr Healy
    Dimaio, J. Michael
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (05): : 1607 - 1607
  • [2] Ventricular reconditioning and pump explantation in patients supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Frazier, O. H.
    Baldwin, Andrew C. W.
    Demirozu, Zumrut T.
    Segura, Ana Maria
    Hernandez, Ruben
    Taegtmeyer, Heinrich
    Mallidi, Hari
    Cohn, William E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 34 (06): : 766 - 772
  • [3] Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Garan, Arthur R.
    Iyer, Vivek
    Whang, William
    Mody, Kanika P.
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Te-Frey, Rosie
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Garan, Hasan
    Jorde, Ulrich P.
    Uriel, Nir
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2014, 60 (03) : 311 - 316
  • [4] Safety of Anticoagulation Reversal in Patients Supported with Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Jennings, Douglas L.
    Jacob, Minu
    Chopra, Anuvrat
    Nemerovski, Carrie W.
    Morgan, Jeffrey A.
    Lanfear, David E.
    [J]. ASAIO JOURNAL, 2014, 60 (04) : 381 - 384
  • [5] Aortic root thrombosis in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Fried, Justin
    Garan, Arthur R.
    Shames, Sophia
    Masoumi, Amirali
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Uriel, Nir
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (12): : 1425 - 1432
  • [6] Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Kuten, David
    McLean, Rhondalyn
    Russell, Stuart
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2013, 128 (22)
  • [7] Ventricular arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
    Gkouziouta, A. Aggeliki
    Bonios, M.
    Zarkalis, D.
    Adamopoulos, S.
    Kogerakis, N.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2019, 21 : 75 - 75
  • [8] Trauma in Patients With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Sarsam, Sinan H.
    Meyers, Deborah E.
    Civitello, Andrew B.
    Agunanne, Enoch E.
    Odegaard, Peggy
    Cohn, William E.
    Frazier, O. H.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 112 (09): : 1520 - 1522
  • [9] Value of Invasive Hemodynamic Assessments in Patients Supported by Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
    Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard
    Brahmbhatt, Darshan H.
    Mak, Susanna
    Ross, Heather J.
    Luk, Adriana
    Rao, Vivek
    Billia, Filio
    [J]. JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2024, 12 (01) : 16 - 27
  • [10] Safety of Anticoagulation Reversal in Patients Supported With Continuous-Flow Left-Ventricular Assist Devices
    Jennings, D. L.
    Jacob, M.
    Chopra, A.
    Nemerovski, C. W.
    Morgan, J. A.
    Lanfear, D. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S313 - S313