A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods

被引:27
|
作者
Kellstedt, Debra K. [1 ]
Spengler, John O. [2 ]
Foster, Margaret [3 ]
Lee, Chanam [4 ]
Maddock, Jay E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Coll Publ Hlth, Med Ctr, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M Sch Publ Hlth, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M Univ Lib, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Texas A&M Coll Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Bikeability; Physical activity; Scoping review; Environmental assessment tools; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL-FACTORS; WALKING; AUDIT; WALKABILITY; URBAN; ACCESSIBILITY; WORKPLACE; STREETS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10900-020-00846-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Bicycling holds promise as a healthy and sustainable means of transportation and physical activity. Despite the growing interest in community-based environmental approaches to promoting physical activity, bikeability has received relatively little attention. This paper provides a scoping review of the instruments developed to measure bikeability along with practice-based analyses of the tools related to user expertise, estimated cost, and required time to implement. The review summarizes the literature, identifies research gaps, and informs stakeholders with articles from EBSCO and transportation databases published after 2003 when the previous bikeability instrument review paper was published. Data extraction included the tool name, data collection method, study location, data collection scale, type of measure, and description. Two reviewers independently reviewed articles included in the full text review, and the inter-rater agreement exceeded 90%. The database search yielded 388 unique articles, and 17 met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Most of the studies, 11 of 17, were applied to settings outside of the U.S. Five studies employed a self-report survey, and five studies examined bikeability using geospatial data, like GIS. Seven studies used a direct observation audit tool-one specifically using a mobile app and another using virtual observation techniques with Google Street View. Bikeability tools are useful for assessing communities and their supports for bicycling. Our primary finding is that advances in technology over the past two decades have driven innovative and useful methodologies, in a variety of disciplines, for assessing the environment, but more consensus is needed to provide a universal definition of bikeability.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 224
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods
    Debra K. Kellstedt
    John O. Spengler
    Margaret Foster
    Chanam Lee
    Jay E. Maddock
    [J]. Journal of Community Health, 2021, 46 : 211 - 224
  • [2] Parenting with a physical disability: A scoping review of assessment methods
    Pastor-Bedard, Nadielda
    Pituch, Evelina
    Lamata, Estelle
    Grondin, Myrian
    Bottari, Carolina
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2023, 70 (02) : 257 - 300
  • [3] Methods and timing in the assessment or postoperative recovery: a scoping review
    Jaensson, Maria
    Nilsson, Ulrica
    Dahlberg, Karuna
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 129 (01) : 92 - 103
  • [4] Methods and criteria for the assessment of orphan drugs: a scoping review
    Mohammadshahi, Marita
    Olyaeemanesh, Alireza
    Ehsani-Chimeh, Elham
    Mobinizadeh, Mohammadreza
    Fakoorfard, Zeinab
    Akbari Sari, Ali
    Aghighi, Mohammad
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [5] Adaptive Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review of Methods
    Nemzoff, Cassandra
    Shah, Hiral A.
    Heupink, Lieke Fleur
    Regan, Lydia
    Ghosh, Srobana
    Pincombe, Morgan
    Guzman, Javier
    Sweeney, Sedona
    Ruiz, Francis
    Vassall, Anna
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (10) : 1549 - 1557
  • [6] Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review
    Zhou, Lifang
    Xue, Panqi
    Zhang, Yixin
    Wei, Fang
    Zhou, Jiena
    Wang, Shasha
    Hu, Yong
    Lou, Xiaoming
    Zou, Hua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [7] A scoping review of assessment methods of competence of general surgical trainees
    Hackney, Lauren
    O'Neill, Stephen
    O'Donnell, Mark
    Spence, Roy
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2023, 21 (01): : 60 - 69
  • [8] Dietary Assessment Methods in Military and Veteran Populations: A Scoping Review
    Collins, Rebecca A.
    Baker, Bradley
    Coyle, Daisy H.
    Rollo, Megan E.
    Burrows, Tracy L.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2020, 12 (03)
  • [9] Clinical Reasoning Assessment Methods: A Scoping Review and Practical Guidance
    Daniel, Michelle
    Rencic, Joseph
    Durning, Steven J.
    Holmboe, Eric
    Santen, Sally A.
    Lang, Valerie
    Ratcliffe, Temple
    Gordon, David
    Heist, Brian
    Lubarsky, Stuart
    Estrada, Carlos A.
    Ballard, Tiffany
    Artino Jr, Anthony R.
    Da Silva, Ana Sergio
    Cleary, Timothy
    Stojan, Jennifer
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 94 (06) : 902 - 912
  • [10] Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review
    Baghbanian, Abdolvahab
    Merlin, Tracy
    Carter, Drew
    Wang, Shuhong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):