Occupational health risk assessment methods in China: A scoping review

被引:6
|
作者
Zhou, Lifang [1 ]
Xue, Panqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yixin [2 ]
Wei, Fang [1 ]
Zhou, Jiena [3 ]
Wang, Shasha [4 ]
Hu, Yong [1 ]
Lou, Xiaoming [1 ]
Zou, Hua [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Inst Occupat Hlth & Radiat Protect, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Shaoxing Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
关键词
occupational health; risk assessment; qualitative; quantitative; semi-quantitative; scoping review; PHARMACOKINETIC MODELS; HEAVY-METALS; BENZENE; EXPOSURE; PLADS;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035996
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Over the decades, many assessment methods have been developed around the world and used for occupational health risk assessment (OHRA). This scoping review integrated the literature on methodological studies of OHRA in China and aimed to identifies the research hot-spots and methodological research perspectives on OHRA in China. Methods: A scoping review of literature was undertaken to explore the research progress on OHRA methods in China. Focusing on OHRA methods, the authors systematically searched Chinese and English databases and relevant guideline websites from the date of establishment to June 30, 2022. Databases included Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the China National Knowledge Internet, WanFang Database. Some other websites were also searched to obtain gray literature. The extracted information included the author, year, region of first author, the target industry, risk assessment model, study type, the main results and conclusions. Results: Finally, 145 of 9,081 studies were included in this review. There were 108 applied studies, 30 comparative studies and 7 optimization studies on OHRA in China. The OHRA methods studied included: (1) qualitative methods such as Romanian model, Australian model, International Council on Mining and Metals model, and Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials; (2) quantitative methods such as the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency inhalation risk assessment model, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic, and Monte Carlo simulation; (3) semi-quantitative methods such as Singapore model, Fuzzy mathematical risk assessment model, Likelihood Exposure Consequence method and Occupational Hazard Risk Index assessment method; (4) comprehensive method (Chinese OHRA standard GBZ/T 298-2017). Each of the OHRA methods had its own strengths and limitations. In order to improve the applicability of OHRA methods, some of them have been optimized by researchers. Conclusions: There is a wide range of OHRA methods studied in China, including applied, comparative, and optimization studies. Their applicability needs to be further tested through further application in different industries. Furthermore, quantitative comparative studies, optimization studies, and modeling studies are also needed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Research Progress in Occupational Health Risk Assessment Methods in China
    Zhou Li Fang
    Tian Fang
    Zou Hua
    Yuan Wei Ming
    Hao Mo
    Zhang Mei Bian
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2017, 30 (08) : 616 - 622
  • [2] Research Progress in Occupational Health Risk Assessment Methods in China
    ZHOU Li Fang
    TIAN Fang
    ZOU Hua
    YUAN Wei Ming
    HAO Mo
    ZHANG Mei Bian
    [J]. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30 (08) : 616 - 622
  • [3] Retrospective Exposure Assessment Methods Used in Occupational Human Health Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review
    Borghi, Francesca
    Mazzucchelli, Libero Andrea
    Campagnolo, Davide
    Rovelli, Sabrina
    Fanti, Giacomo
    Keller, Marta
    Cattaneo, Andrea
    Spinazze, Andrea
    Cavallo, Domenico Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (17) : 1 - 17
  • [4] Adaptive Health Technology Assessment: A Scoping Review of Methods
    Nemzoff, Cassandra
    Shah, Hiral A.
    Heupink, Lieke Fleur
    Regan, Lydia
    Ghosh, Srobana
    Pincombe, Morgan
    Guzman, Javier
    Sweeney, Sedona
    Ruiz, Francis
    Vassall, Anna
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (10) : 1549 - 1557
  • [5] Occupational health and safety risk assessment: A systematic literature review of models, methods, and applications
    Liu, Ran
    Liu, Hu-Chen
    Shi, Hua
    Gu, Xiuzhu
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2023, 160
  • [6] Review of Recent Researches on Occupational Health Assessment in China
    Li, Minyan
    Huang, Deyin
    Liu, Mao
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SAFETY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IN CHINA, 2012, 2012, 43 : 464 - 471
  • [7] Chemical risk assessment in occupational and environmental health:Objectives and methods
    Bonvallot, Nathalie
    Pery, Alexandre
    Lafon, Dominique
    Boulanger, Guillaume
    Karg, Frank
    Mosqueron, Luc
    Ismert, Muriel
    Guillossou, Gaelle
    Glorennec, Philippe
    [J]. ENVIRONNEMENT RISQUES & SANTE, 2013, 12 (05): : 434 - 441
  • [8] Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review
    Baghbanian, Abdolvahab
    Merlin, Tracy
    Carter, Drew
    Wang, Shuhong
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (11):
  • [9] A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods
    Kellstedt, Debra K.
    Spengler, John O.
    Foster, Margaret
    Lee, Chanam
    Maddock, Jay E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2021, 46 (01) : 211 - 224
  • [10] A Scoping Review of Bikeability Assessment Methods
    Debra K. Kellstedt
    John O. Spengler
    Margaret Foster
    Chanam Lee
    Jay E. Maddock
    [J]. Journal of Community Health, 2021, 46 : 211 - 224