The impact of microhydroelectricity on household welfare indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Karumba, Mary [1 ]
Muchapondwa, Edwin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, Sch Econ, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm Technol & Social Sci, Lulea, Sweden
关键词
Microhydro; Rural electrification; Impact; Kenya; PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; RURAL ELECTRIFICATION; SOUTH-AFRICA; ELECTRICITY; VILLAGES; KENYA; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s12053-017-9590-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of small-scale off-grid renewable energy for rural electrification is now seen as part of the sustainable energy solutions. The expectation from such small-scale investment is that it can meet the basic energy needs of a household and subsequently improve some aspects of household welfare. However, these stated benefits remain largely hypothetical because there are data and methodological challenges in existing literature attempting to isolate such impact. This paper uses field data from microhydro schemes in Kenya, and propensity score matching technique to demonstrate such an impact. We find that on average, households connected to microhydroelectricity consume 1.5 l less of kerosene per month compared to households without any such electricity connection. In addition, non-connected households spend 0.92 USD more for recharging their cell phone batteries per month in comparison to those who were using microhydroelectricity service. Finally, school children from households that are connected to microhydroelectricity were found to devote 43 min less on evening studies compared to those without electricity. The findings provide interesting insights to some of the claims made for or against use of off grid renewable energy for rural electrification.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 681
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Welfare indicators in swine
    Alquete de Arreguy Baptista, Raissa Ivna
    Bertani, Giovani Rota
    Barbosa, Clara Nilce
    [J]. CIENCIA RURAL, 2011, 41 (10): : 1823 - 1830
  • [42] SOW WELFARE INDICATORS
    BROOM, D
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1988, 123 (09) : 235 - 235
  • [43] INDICATORS OF POOR WELFARE
    BROOM, DM
    [J]. BRITISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1986, 142 (06): : 524 - 526
  • [44] Impact of alternative livelihood interventions on household welfare: Evidence from rural Ethiopia
    Kebebe, E.
    Shibru, F.
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2017, 75 : 67 - 72
  • [46] Impact assessment of adopting improved rice variety on farm household welfare in Ethiopia
    Assaye, Abebaw
    Habte, Endeshaw
    Sakurai, Seiichi
    Alemu, Dawit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2022, 10
  • [47] A microsimulation study of COVID-19's impact on household welfare in Ethiopia
    Tekleselassie, Tsegay
    Araar, Abdelkrim
    Abay, Mehari
    Abay, Kibrom
    [J]. OXFORD DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2024,
  • [48] The Impact of Trade Liberalisation on Household Welfare in a Developing Country with Imperfect Labour Markets
    Seshan, Ganesh K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2014, 50 (02): : 226 - 243
  • [49] Impact of government support programmes on household welfare in the Limpopo province of South Africa
    Gadisi, Mikovhe
    Owusu-Sekyere, Enoch
    Ogundeji, Abiodun Akintunde
    [J]. DEVELOPMENT SOUTHERN AFRICA, 2020, 37 (06) : 937 - 952
  • [50] Impact of Migration on Fertility and Abortion: Evidence From the Household and Welfare Study of Accra
    Rokicki, Slawa
    Montana, Livia
    Fink, Guenther
    [J]. DEMOGRAPHY, 2014, 51 (06) : 2229 - 2254