Genomic Landscape of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in Commercial Turkey Production in the United States

被引:6
|
作者
Smith, Emily A. [1 ]
Miller, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Weber, Bonnie P. [1 ]
Aguayo, Jeannette Munoz [2 ]
Figueroa, Cristian Flores [2 ]
Huisinga, Jared [3 ]
Nezworski, Jill [4 ]
Kromm, Michelle [5 ]
Ben Wileman [6 ]
Johnson, Timothy J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Vet & Biomed Sci, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Midcent Res & Outreach Ctr, Willmar, MN USA
[3] Life Sci Innovat, Willmar, MN USA
[4] Blue House Vet LLC, Buffalo Lake, MN USA
[5] Jennie O Turkey Store, Willmar, MN USA
[6] Select Genet, Willmar, MN USA
关键词
bacteria; genomics; molecular epidemiology; pangenome; phylogenetics; poultry; turkey; veterinary; GLIDING MOTILITY; INFECTION; IDENTIFICATION; RESISTANCE; ALGORITHM; BROILERS; PLASMID; VACCINE; TREE; TOOL;
D O I
10.1128/AEM.02874-19
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale is a causative agent of respiratory tract infections in avian hosts worldwide but is a particular problem for commercial turkey production. Little is known about the ecologic and evolutionary dynamics of O. rhinotracheale, which makes prevention and control of this pathogen a challenge. The purpose of this study was to gain insight into the genetic relationships between O. rhinotracheale populations through comparative genomics of clinical isolates from different U.S. turkey producers. O. rhinotracheale clinical isolates were collected from four major U.S. turkey producers and several independent turkey growers from the upper Midwest and Southeast, and whole-genome sequencing was performed. Genomes were compared phylogenetically using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based analysis, and then assembly and annotations were performed to identify genes encoding putative virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance determinants. A pangenome approach was also used to establish a core set of genes consistently present in O. rhinotracheale and to highlight differences in gene content between phylogenetic clades. A total of 1,457 nonrecombinant SNPs were identified from 157 O. rhinotracheale genomes, and four distinct phylogenetic clades were identified. Isolates clustered by company on the phylogenetic tree, however, and each company had isolates in multiple clades with similar collection dates, indicating that there are multiple O. rhinotracheale strains circulating within each of the companies examined. Additionally, several antimicrobial resistance proteins, putative virulence factors, and the pOR1 plasmid were associated with particular clades and multilocus sequence types, which may explain why the same strains seem to have persisted in the same turkey operations for decades. IMPORTANCE The whole-genome approach enhances our understanding of evolutionary relationships between clinical Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale isolates from different commercial turkey producers and allows for identification of genes associated with virulence, antimicrobial resistance, or mobile genetic elements that are often excluded using traditional typing methods. Additionally, differentiating O. rhinotracheale isolates at the whole-genome level may provide insight into selection of the most appropriate autogenous vaccine strain, or groups of strains, for a given population of clinical isolates.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seroprevalence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in commercial laying hens in the north central region of the United States
    Heeder, CJ
    Lopes, VC
    Nagaraja, KV
    Shaw, DP
    Halvorson, DA
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 2001, 45 (04) : 1064 - 1067
  • [2] Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in turkey breeders
    DeRosa, M
    Droual, R
    Chin, RP
    Shivaprasad, HL
    Walker, RL
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 1996, 40 (04) : 865 - 874
  • [3] Isolation and identification of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from commercial turkey flocks in the upper midwest
    Roepke, DC
    Back, A
    Shaw, DP
    Nagaraja, KV
    Sprenger, SJ
    Halvorson, DA
    [J]. AVIAN DISEASES, 1998, 42 (01) : 219 - 221
  • [4] Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in a turkey flock in Ontario
    Abdul-Aziz, TA
    Weber, LJ
    [J]. CANADIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL-REVUE VETERINAIRE CANADIENNE, 1999, 40 (05): : 349 - 350
  • [5] Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale infection in a commercial broiler flock
    Turan, N
    Akçadag, B
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2003, 27 (06): : 1447 - 1450
  • [6] Evaluation of a commercial system for the identification of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale
    Post, KW
    Murphy, SC
    Boyette, JB
    Resseguie, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 1999, 11 (01) : 97 - 99
  • [7] Occurrence of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale in Polish turkey flocks
    Kursa, Olimpia
    Tomczyk, Grzegorz
    Sawicka-Durkalec, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 66 (01) : 77 - 84
  • [8] Isolation of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale from meat turkey in Austria
    Hafez, HM
    Friedrich, S
    [J]. TIERARZTLICHE UMSCHAU, 1998, 53 (08): : 500 - +
  • [9] Pathogenicity of Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale for turkey poults under experimental conditions
    Ryll, M
    Hinz, KH
    Salisch, H
    Kruse, W
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1996, 139 (01) : 19 - 19
  • [10] Conditions that induce biofilm production by Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale
    De la Rosa-Ramos, Miguel A.
    Rodriguez-Cruz, Maricruz
    Lopez-Villegas, Edgar O.
    Castro-Escarpulli, Graciela
    Guerra-Infante, Fernando M.
    [J]. AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 44 (05) : 366 - 369