Risk assessment and risk stratification for perioperative complications and mitigation: Where should the focus be? How are we doing?

被引:7
|
作者
Adeleke, Ibukun [1 ]
Chae, Christina [1 ]
Okocha, Obianuju [1 ]
Sweitzer, BobbieJean [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Feinberg 5-704,251 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
risk assessment; optimization; perioperative complications; functional capacity; biomarkers; anemia; adverse outcomes; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; 2014 ACC/AHA GUIDELINE; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIAC RISK; PREOPERATIVE ANEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION; POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Various risk stratification tools are used to predict patients' risk of adverse outcomes. Most of these tools are based on type of surgery and patient comorbidities. Accuracy of risk prediction is improved when additional factors such as functional capacity are included. However, these tools are limited because data are obtained from specific patient populations, are simplified to aid ease of use, and do not account for improved treatment modalities that occur over time. Risk estimation allows for shared decision-making among the perioperative care team and the patient, for perioperative planning, and for opportunity for risk mitigation. Technological advancement in data collection will likely improve existing risk assessment and allow development of new options. Future research should focus on establishing and standardizing perioperative outcomes that include meaningful patient-centric considerations such as quality of life. We review available stratification tools and important risk assessment biomarkers that address the most common causes of adverse outcomes. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条