Risk assessment and risk stratification for perioperative complications and mitigation: Where should the focus be? How are we doing?

被引:7
|
作者
Adeleke, Ibukun [1 ]
Chae, Christina [1 ]
Okocha, Obianuju [1 ]
Sweitzer, BobbieJean [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Feinberg 5-704,251 East Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
risk assessment; optimization; perioperative complications; functional capacity; biomarkers; anemia; adverse outcomes; POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; 2014 ACC/AHA GUIDELINE; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; CARDIAC RISK; PREOPERATIVE ANEMIA; CARDIOVASCULAR EVALUATION; POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; HEART-FAILURE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpa.2020.11.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Various risk stratification tools are used to predict patients' risk of adverse outcomes. Most of these tools are based on type of surgery and patient comorbidities. Accuracy of risk prediction is improved when additional factors such as functional capacity are included. However, these tools are limited because data are obtained from specific patient populations, are simplified to aid ease of use, and do not account for improved treatment modalities that occur over time. Risk estimation allows for shared decision-making among the perioperative care team and the patient, for perioperative planning, and for opportunity for risk mitigation. Technological advancement in data collection will likely improve existing risk assessment and allow development of new options. Future research should focus on establishing and standardizing perioperative outcomes that include meaningful patient-centric considerations such as quality of life. We review available stratification tools and important risk assessment biomarkers that address the most common causes of adverse outcomes. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 529
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stewardship, risk assessment, and mitigation: How should they be integrated?
    Hendley, Paul
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [2] Risk assessment of perioperative neurocognitive disorders, where are we now?
    Soehle, Martin
    Coburn, Mark
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 35 (03) : 409 - 418
  • [3] Complications and costs after high-risk surgery: Where should we focus quality improvement initiatives?
    Dimick, JB
    Pronovost, PJ
    Cowan, JA
    Lipsett, PA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2003, 196 (05) : 671 - 678
  • [4] Perioperative Assessment and Risk Stratification of the Obese Patient
    Schofield, Deborah L.
    Morton, Patricia G.
    Brokos, Carol
    Gruel, Renee
    Johannes, Sarah
    McBride, Nancy
    Moses, Gloria
    BARIATRIC NURSING AND SURGICAL PATIENT CARE, 2011, 6 (04): : 201 - 206
  • [5] Quantitative risk assessment since the Red Book: Where have we come and where should we be going?
    Crump, KS
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2003, 9 (05): : 1105 - 1112
  • [6] Pulmonary embolism risk stratification: where are we heading?
    Paiva, Luis
    Barra, Sergio
    Providencia, Rui
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 43 (01) : 298 - 300
  • [7] Perioperative risk assessment - focus on functional capacity
    Hanley, Ciara
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 34 (03) : 309 - 316
  • [8] Atrial fibrillation and its complications: a focus on identifying risk factors and risk stratification
    Shahid, Farhan
    Shantsila, Eduard
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2016, 2 (02) : 88 - +
  • [9] Complications and costs: Where should we focus our quality improvement efforts?
    Dimick, JB
    Pronovost, PJ
    Lipsett, PA
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (12) : A161 - A161
  • [10] Sex Offender Risk Assessment: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?
    L. Maaike Helmus
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2018, 20