Polyetheretherketone patient-specific implants (PPSI) for the reconstruction of two different mandibular contour deformities

被引:10
|
作者
Atef, Mohammed [1 ]
Mounir, Mohamed [1 ]
Shawky, Mohamed [1 ]
Mounir, Samy [2 ]
Gibaly, Amr [3 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Modern Sci & Arts Univ MSA, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 6th Of October, Egypt
[3] Beni Suef Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, East Nile Educ Compound, Bani Suwayf 62764, Egypt
来源
关键词
Mandibular deformity; Patient-specific implant (PSI); CAD; CAM; PEEK; Computer-guided surgery; Facial soft tissue profile; SOFT-TISSUE CHANGES; PEEK; SURGERY; AUGMENTATION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10006-021-00984-6
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background This study aims to prospect the soft and hard tissue changes after augmentation of two different local mandibular contour defects using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific onlay implants. Methods Six patients with disfiguring local mandibular deformities were included in this study (five males and one female) and received seven PEEK patient-specific implants (PSI), virtually designed and surgically settled to augment seven mandibular defects, three deficient chins, and four mandibular angels. The analysis of the soft and hard tissue changes utilized the superimposition of the preoperative and the 6-month postoperative sagittal and coronal CT views, after standardizing the radiographic interpretation. Results The soft tissue gain for the chin was 6.8 mm +/- 0.98 with a 45.8% increase versus 4.42 mm +/- 0.41 with a 22.9% increase for the angle. The difference in the soft tissue gain between the two groups was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). Comparing the soft tissue gain to the planned implant thickness, the percentage of the soft tissue gain for the chin recorded 109.2% versus 65.57% for the angle. The difference between the two groups was also statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Conclusion PEEK patient-specific onlay implants represented an efficient and straightforward modality to augment local mandibular contour deformities with favorable esthetic outcomes; the total soft tissue profile gain of the chin region markedly exceeded that of the mandibular angle.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 309
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Keys for successful reconstruction of mandibular defects using three-dimensionally printed patient-specific titanium implants
    Kim, Jin-Wook
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2021, 47 (04) : 237 - 238
  • [22] Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction
    Steffen, Claudius
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Willsch, Magdalena
    Soares, Ana Prates
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Heiland, Max
    Kreutzer, Kilian
    Huber, Gerd
    Rendenbach, Carsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2023, 140
  • [23] Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects
    Schepers, Rutger H.
    Raghoebar, Gerry M.
    Vissink, Arjan
    Stenekes, Martin W.
    Kraeima, Joep
    Roodenburg, Jan L.
    Reintsema, Harry
    Witjes, Max J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (05) : 649 - 657
  • [24] Patient-Specific Orthopaedic Implants
    Haglin, Jack M.
    Eltorai, Adam E. M.
    Gil, Joseph A.
    Marcaccio, Stephen E.
    Botero-Hincapie, Juliana
    Daniels, Alan H.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2016, 8 (04) : 417 - 424
  • [25] Benefits of Patient-Specific Reconstruction Plates in Mandibular Reconstruction Surgical Simulation and Resident Education
    Khanh Linh Tran
    Mong, Matthew Lee
    Durham, James Scott
    Prisman, Eitan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (18)
  • [26] Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction
    Wilde, Frank
    Hanken, Henning
    Probst, Florian
    Schramm, Alexander
    Heiland, Max
    Cornelius, Carl-Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2015, 10 (12) : 2035 - 2051
  • [27] Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction
    Frank Wilde
    Henning Hanken
    Florian Probst
    Alexander Schramm
    Max Heiland
    Carl-Peter Cornelius
    [J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2015, 10 : 2035 - 2051
  • [28] Rapid prototyped patient specific guiding implants in critical mandibular reconstruction
    Stoor, Patricia
    Suomalainen, Anni
    Mesimaki, Karri
    Kontio, Risto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (01) : 63 - 70
  • [29] Unbreakable? – Frakturen patientenspezifischer Implantate nach alloplastischer UnterkieferrekonstruktionUnbreakable?—Fracture of patient-specific implants after alloplastic mandibular reconstruction
    T. Telschow
    F. Wilde
    S. Pietzka
    A. Schramm
    F. Mascha
    [J]. Der MKG-Chirurg, 2019, 12 (4): : 263 - 267
  • [30] Surgical Outcomes of Orbital Fracture Reconstruction Using Patient-Specific Implants
    Blumer, Michael
    Essig, Harald
    Steigmiller, Klaus
    Wagner, Maximilian Eberhard
    Gander, Thomas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 79 (06) : 1302 - 1312