Diagnostic test accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation to indicate the etiology of cardiac arrest: A systematic review

被引:16
|
作者
Reynolds, Joshua C. [1 ]
Nicholson, Tonia [2 ]
O'Neil, Brian [3 ]
Drennan, Ian R. [4 ]
Issa, Mahmoud [5 ]
Welsford, Michelle
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Human Med, Dept Emergency Med, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[2] Waikato Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Hamilton, New Zealand
[3] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Univ Toronto, Div Emergency Med, Dept Family & Community Med Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Ctr Resuscitat Sci, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[6] McMaster Univ, Div Emergency Med, Dept Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
关键词
Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Echocardiography; Point-of-care ultrasound; Diagnostic test accuracy; Diagnosis; Systematic review; FOCUSED ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEMODYNAMIC INSTABILITY; LIFE-SUPPORT; PROTOCOL; EXAM; SONOGRAPHY; CONSENSUS; QUALITY; PEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.01.006
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Aim: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used in cardiac arrest patients to assess for reversible causes. We aimed to conduct a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review of intra-arrest POCUS to indicate the etiology of cardiac arrest in adults in any setting. Methods: This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020205207) and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. We searched Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library on October 6, 2021. Two investigators screened titles and abstracts, extracted data, and assessed risks of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) template. We estimated sensitivity and specificity when feasible and evaluated the certainty of evidence with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Of 8,621 search results, 12 observational studies reported 26 combinations of index tests and reference standards to indicate six different etiologies of cardiac arrest. All studies had high risks of bias from subject selection, lack of blinding, reference standards susceptible to confounding, and/or differential verification. One study reported sufficient data to complete contingency tables for sensitivity and specificity of POCUS to identify myocardial infarction, cardiac tamponade, and pulmonary embolism as the etiology of cardiac arrest. Heterogeneity and risk of bias precluded meta analysis and the certainty of evidence was uniformly very low. Conclusions: It is feasible to identify reversible causes of cardiac arrest with POCUS, but the current literature is heterogenous with high risks of bias, wide confidence intervals, and very low certainty of evidence, which render these data difficult to interpret.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Year in review 2010: Critical Care - cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Jeffery C Metzger
    Alexander L Eastman
    Paul E Pepe
    [J]. Critical Care, 15
  • [42] Year in review 2010: Critical Care - cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation
    Metzger, Jeffery C.
    Eastman, Alexander L.
    Pepe, Paul E.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 15 (06):
  • [43] Prognostication with point -of -care echocardiography during cardiac arrest: A systematic review
    Reynolds, Joshua C.
    Issa, Mahmoud S.
    Nicholson, Tonia C.
    Drennan, Ian R.
    Berg, Katherine M.
    O'Neil, Brian J.
    Welsford, Michelle
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2020, 152 : 56 - 68
  • [44] Diagnostic test accuracy of the initial electrocardiogram after resuscitation from cardiac arrest to indicate invasive coronary angiographic findings and attempted revascularization: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    McFadden, Patrick
    Reynolds, Joshua C.
    Madder, Ryan D.
    Brown, Michael
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2021, 160 : 20 - 36
  • [45] Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations
    Bjarte Sorensen
    Steinar Hunskaar
    [J]. The Ultrasound Journal, 11
  • [46] Point-of-care ultrasound in primary care: a systematic review of generalist performed point-of-care ultrasound in unselected populations
    Sorensen, Bjarte
    Hunskaar, Steinar
    [J]. ULTRASOUND JOURNAL, 2019, 11 (01):
  • [47] Is point-of-care ultrasound a reliable predictor of outcome during traumatic cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis from the SHoC investigators
    Lalande, Elizabeth
    Burwash-Brennan, Talia
    Burns, Katharine
    Harris, Tim
    Thomas, Stephen
    Woo, Michael Y.
    Atkinson, Paul
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2021, 167 : 128 - 136
  • [48] Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Intussusception in Children Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Lin-Martore, Margaret
    Kornblith, Aaron E.
    Kohn, Michael A.
    Gottlieb, Michael
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (04) : 1008 - 1016
  • [49] Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Patients With Respiratory Tract Disorders - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Malik, F. A.
    Raheem, A.
    Selvam, S.
    Patel, U. K.
    Mahmood, S.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [50] Cardiac Point-Of-Care Ultrasound An Emergency Medicine Review
    Alerhand, Stephen
    Adrian, Robert James
    Taylor, Lindsay Anne
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 42 (04) : 731 - 754