Influence of sampling rate on voice analysis for assessment of Parkinson's disease

被引:4
|
作者
Wu, Kebin [1 ]
Zhang, David [2 ]
Lu, Guangming [3 ]
Guo, Zhenhua [4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Elect Engn Dept, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong Shenzhen, Sch Sci & Engn, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Biocomp Res Ctr, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Grad Sch Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
SPEECH; CLASSIFICATION; DYSFUNCTION; IMPAIRMENT; ALGORITHMS; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1121/1.5053681
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Parkinson's diagnosis through voice analysis (PDVA) has been attracting increasing attention. In this paper, the influence of sampling rate on PDVA is studied. By analyzing the main difficulties that hamper the development of PDVA, the significance of seeking guidelines on sampling rate is discussed. Then voices from both healthy controls and patients with Parkinson's disease are recorded, for which the sampling rate used is given special consideration. Recordings of other sampling rates are generated via down sampling the recorded voices. Then it is proposed to adopt six metrics from four levels to assess the impacts of sampling rate, which are information entropy, reconstruction error, feature correlation, classification accuracy, computational cost, and the storage cost. Through extensive experiments, basic guideline to seek an appropriate sampling rate is provided. It is concluded that a sampling rate of 96 kHz is preferred when no limits of storage and computational costs are imposed. However, a lower sampling rate may be needed if the storage size and computational complexity are the main concerns. (C) 2018 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1416 / 1423
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Acoustic voice assessment in Parkinson's disease patients submitted to posteroventral pallidotomy
    Mourao, LF
    Aguiar, PMD
    Ferraz, FAP
    Behlau, MS
    Ferraz, HB
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2005, 63 (01) : 20 - 25
  • [22] Acoustic analysis of voice in Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
    Silbergleit, A. K.
    LeWitt, P. A.
    Gardner, G.
    Peterson, E.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2013, 28 : S122 - S122
  • [23] Voice Analysis to Differentiate the Dopaminergic Response in People With Parkinson's Disease
    Jain, Anubhav
    Abedinpour, Kian
    Polat, Ozgur
    caliskan, Mine Melodi
    Asaei, Afsaneh
    Pfister, Franz M. J.
    Fietzek, Urban M.
    Cernak, Milos
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [24] Computerized analysis of speech and voice for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review
    Ngo, Quoc Cuong
    Motin, Mohammod Abdul
    Pah, Nemuel Daniel
    Drotar, Peter
    Kempster, Peter
    Kumar, Dinesh
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2022, 226
  • [25] Multilingual Analysis of Speech and Voice Disorders in Patients with Parkinson's Disease
    Kovac, Daniel
    Mekyska, Jiri
    Galaz, Zoltan
    Brabenec, Lubos
    Kostalova, Milena
    Rapcsak, Steven Z.
    Rektorova, Irena
    2021 44TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (TSP), 2021, : 273 - 277
  • [26] Speech and voice disorders in Parkinson's disease
    Martinez-Sanchez, Francisco
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2010, 51 (09) : 542 - 550
  • [27] Acoustic analysis of voice in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of voice disability and meta-analysis of studies
    Chiaramonte, Rita
    Bonfiglio, Marco
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2020, 70 (11) : 393 - 404
  • [28] Detection of Parkinson's Disease by Voice Signal
    Masic, Fatima
    Dug, Mehmed
    Nuhic, Jasna
    Kevric, Jasmin
    ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS II, 2018, 28 : 1066 - 1073
  • [29] Voice treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease
    Ramig, LO
    VOICE UPDATE, 1996, 97 : 205 - 215
  • [30] Voice characteristics in the progression of Parkinson's disease
    Holmes, RJ
    Oates, JM
    Phyland, DJ
    Hughes, AJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2000, 35 (03) : 407 - 418