A prospective, randomized trial of nifedipine vs. ritodrine in threatened preterm labor

被引:50
|
作者
García-Velasco, JA [1 ]
González, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp La Paz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
nifedipine; ritodrine; preterm labor; Doppler ultrasound;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00053-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the tocolytic efficacy and maternal tolerance of nifedipine with ritodrine in the management of threatened preterm labor. Methods: Prospective randomized study of 52 singleton pregnancies with preterm labor between 26 and 34 week's gestation. The capacity to delay delivery 48 h, 7 days, until week 36 or until fetal weight reached 2500 g were the outcome variables assessed. Doppler ultrasound studies were performed on the fetal umbilical artery as control. Results: No significant differences were found in the delay of delivery, but significantly fewer maternal side-effects were found in the nifedipine group. Doppler ultrasound results were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Nifedipine is a valid and well-tolerated alternative among the tocolytic drugs, and apparently does not significantly alter fetal vascular blood flow. (C) 1998 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 244
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nifedipine versus Ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor and analysis of side effects
    Jaju P.B.
    Dhabadi Veena B.
    [J]. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (5) : 534 - 537
  • [22] A randomized trial of two dose regimens of nifedipine for management of preterm labor
    Nassar, Anwar
    Khalil, Ali
    Awwad, Johnny
    Abu Musa, Antoine
    Tabbara, Jad
    Usta, Hab
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S206 - S206
  • [23] Late vs. early amniotomy for preterm induction of labor: a randomized-controlled trial
    Robbins, Lindsay S.
    Ye Yuanfan
    Becker, David
    Xue, Yumo
    Bushman, Elisa T.
    Battarbee, Ashley N.
    Szychowski, Jeff M.
    Tita, Alan
    Harper, Lorie M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 224 (02) : S595 - S596
  • [24] Nifedipine Compared With Atosiban for Treating Preterm Labor A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Salim, Raed
    Garmi, Gali
    Nachum, Zohar
    Zafran, Noah
    Baram, Shira
    Shalev, Eliezer
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (06): : 1323 - 1331
  • [25] Atosiban Combined with Ritodrine for Late Threatened Abortion or Threatened Premature Labor Patients with No Response to Ritodrine: A Clinical Trial
    Fu, Shuai
    Xie, Haitian
    Zhong, Yilei
    Xu, Qi
    Zhu, Liqiong
    Mo, Hanjie
    Zhang, Jianping
    Liu, Yinglin
    Chen, Hui
    Zhong, Yonghong
    Tan, Jianping
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2021, 27
  • [26] Ritodrine in oral maintenance of tocolysis after active preterm labor: Randomized controlled trial
    Matijevic, R
    Grgic, O
    Vasilj, O
    [J]. CROATIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 47 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [27] RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF INDOMETHACIN AND RITODRINE FOR THE LONG-TERM TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR
    BESINGER, RE
    NIEBYL, JR
    KEYES, WG
    JOHNSON, TRB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 164 (04) : 981 - 988
  • [28] Maintenance nifedipine vs. placebo: A prospective, double blind trial
    Lyell, Deirdre
    Pullen, Kristin
    Mannan, Jana
    Chitkara, Usha
    Druzin, Maurice L.
    Caughey, Aaron
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S6 - S6
  • [29] Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor; A meta-analysis - Reply
    Oei, SG
    Mol, BJ
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 79 (07) : 618 - 619
  • [30] Comparison between Oral Nifedipine alone Vs Oral Nifedipine plus Progesterone as Tocolytic Agent in the Treatment of Threatened Preterm Labor
    Nisa, Shams Un
    Chaudhry, Iram
    Hanif, Hina
    [J]. PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2016, 10 (03): : 979 - 982