A prospective, randomized trial of nifedipine vs. ritodrine in threatened preterm labor

被引:50
|
作者
García-Velasco, JA [1 ]
González, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp La Paz, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
nifedipine; ritodrine; preterm labor; Doppler ultrasound;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00053-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the tocolytic efficacy and maternal tolerance of nifedipine with ritodrine in the management of threatened preterm labor. Methods: Prospective randomized study of 52 singleton pregnancies with preterm labor between 26 and 34 week's gestation. The capacity to delay delivery 48 h, 7 days, until week 36 or until fetal weight reached 2500 g were the outcome variables assessed. Doppler ultrasound studies were performed on the fetal umbilical artery as control. Results: No significant differences were found in the delay of delivery, but significantly fewer maternal side-effects were found in the nifedipine group. Doppler ultrasound results were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Nifedipine is a valid and well-tolerated alternative among the tocolytic drugs, and apparently does not significantly alter fetal vascular blood flow. (C) 1998 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 244
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: A randomized multicenter trial
    Papatsonis, DNM
    vanGeijn, HP
    Ader, HJ
    Lange, FM
    Bleker, OP
    Dekker, GA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (02): : 230 - 234
  • [2] Effectiveness of nifedipine in threatened preterm labor: a randomized trial
    Songthamwat, Srisuda
    Nan, Chatchanawadee Na
    Songthamwat, Metha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2018, 10 : 317 - 323
  • [3] Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: A randomized multicenter trial - Reply
    Papatsonis, DNM
    Dekker, GA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 90 (06): : 1023 - 1024
  • [4] A randomized comparison of nifedipine and ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor
    Koks, CAM
    Bröilmann, HAM
    de Kleine, MJK
    Manger, PA
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1998, 77 (02): : 171 - 176
  • [5] Feasibility of a randomized controlled trial testing nifedipine vs. placebo for the treatment of preterm labor
    Abenhaim, Haim A.
    Tremblay, Valerie
    Tremblay, Lise
    Audibert, Francois
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (04) : 301 - 304
  • [6] Glyceryl trinitrate vs. ritodrine for the treatment of preterm labor
    Wani, MP
    Barakzai, N
    Graham, I
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2004, 85 (02) : 165 - 167
  • [7] COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE AND RITODRINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRETERM LABOR
    BRACERO, LA
    LEIKIN, E
    KIRSHENBAUM, N
    TEJANI, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (06) : 365 - 369
  • [8] Neonatal effects of nifedipine and ritodrine for preterm labor
    Papatsonis, DNM
    Kok, JH
    Van Geijn, HP
    Bleker, OP
    Adèr, HJ
    Dekker, GA
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (04): : 477 - 481
  • [9] NIFEDIPINE VERSUS RITODRINE FOR SUPPRESSING PRETERM LABOR
    MEYER, WR
    RANDALL, HW
    GRAVES, WL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1990, 35 (06) : 649 - 653
  • [10] NIFEDIPINE VERSUS RITODRINE FOR SUPPRESSION OF PRETERM LABOR
    KUPFERMINC, M
    LESSING, JB
    YARON, Y
    PEYSER, MR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (12): : 1090 - 1094