Dispatch optimization of concentrating solar power with utility-scale photovoltaics

被引:40
|
作者
Hamilton, William T. [1 ]
Husted, Mark A. [1 ]
Newman, Alexandra M. [1 ]
Braun, Robert J. [1 ]
Wagner, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, 1500 Illinois St, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Thermal Sci Grp, 15013 Denver West Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Dispatch optimization; Concentrating solar power (CSP); Photovoltaics (PV); Lithium-ion battery; Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP); CSP-PV hybrid systems; Grid integration; System analysis; ELECTRICAL ENERGY-STORAGE; BATTERY STORAGE; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; PV; PLANTS; SYSTEMS; OPERATION; COST; COMBINATION; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11081-019-09449-y
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Concentrating solar power (CSP) tower technologies capture thermal radiation from the sun utilizing a field of solar-tracking heliostats. When paired with inexpensive thermal energy storage (TES), CSP technologies can dispatch electricity during peak-market-priced hours, day or night. The cost of utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) systems has dropped significantly in the last decade, resulting in inexpensive energy production during daylight hours. The hybridization of PV and CSP with TES systems has the potential to provide continuous and stable energy production at a lower cost than a PV or CSP system alone. Hybrid systems are gaining popularity in international markets as a means to increase renewable energy portfolios across the world. Historically, CSP-PV hybrid systems have been evaluated using either monthly averages of hourly PV production or scheduling algorithms that neglect the time-of-production value of electricity in the market. To more accurately evaluate a CSP-PV-battery hybrid design, we develop a profit-maximizing mixed-integer linear program (H) that determines a dispatch schedule for the individual sub-systems with a sub-hourly time fidelity. We present the mathematical formulation of such a model and show that it is computationally expensive to solve. To improve model tractability and reduce solution times, we offer techniques that: (1) reduce the problem size, (2) tighten the linear programming relaxation of (H) via reformulation and the introduction of cuts, and (3) implement an optimization-based heuristic (that can yield initial feasible solutions for ( H) and, at any rate, yields near-optimal solutions). Applying these solution techniques results in a 79% improvement in solve time, on average, for our 48-h instances of (H); corresponding solution times for an annual model run decrease by as much as 93%, where such a run consists of solving 365 instances of (H), retaining only the first 24 h' worth of the solution, and sliding the time window forward 24 h. We present annual system metrics for two locations and two markets that inform design practices for hybrid systems and lay the groundwork for a more exhaustive policy analysis. A comparison of alternative hybrid systems to the CSP-only system demonstrates that hybrid models can almost double capacity factors while resulting in a 30% improvement related to various economic metrics.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 369
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the Cost Benefits of US Utility-Scale Photovoltaics Plus Energy Storage Systems
    Fu, Ran
    Remo, Timothy
    Margolis, Robert
    2018 IEEE 7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION (WCPEC) (A JOINT CONFERENCE OF 45TH IEEE PVSC, 28TH PVSEC & 34TH EU PVSEC), 2018, : 3783 - 3789
  • [42] The Impact of Utility-Scale Photovoltaics Plant on Near Surface Turbulence Characteristics in Gobi Areas
    Jiang, Junxia
    Gao, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Bolong
    ATMOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [43] Integration of SmartParks in a Power System with Utility-Scale PV Plant
    Arzani, Ali
    Venayagamoorthy, Ganesh K.
    2018 IEEE/PES TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION (T&D), 2018,
  • [44] Utility-scale energy storage in an imperfectly competitive power sector
    Virasjoki, Vilma
    Siddiqui, Afzal S.
    Oliveira, Fabricio
    Salo, Ahti
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 88 (88)
  • [45] SIMULATION OF UTILITY-SCALE CENTRAL RECEIVER SYSTEM POWER PLANTS
    Wagner, Michael J.
    Klein, Sanford A.
    Reindl, Douglas T.
    ES2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY, VOL 2, 2009, : 605 - 614
  • [46] Characterization of Suncore's Utility-scale CPV Power Plants
    Foresi, James
    Babej, Alaric
    Han, Rick
    Liao, Tingdi
    Wang, Charlie
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONCENTRATOR PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS (CPV-11), 2015, 1679
  • [47] FORECASTING FOR UTILITY-SCALE WIND FARMS - THE POWER MODEL CHALLENGE
    Collins, Jonathan
    Parkes, Jeremy
    Tindal, Andrew
    2009 CIGRE/IEEE PES JOINT SYMPOSIUM INTEGRATION OF WIDE-SCALE RENEWABLE RESOURCES INTO THE POWER DELIVERY SYSTEM, 2009, : 436 - 445
  • [48] Measuring Soiling Losses at Utility-scale PV Power Plants
    Gostein, Michael
    Caron, J. Riley
    Littmann, Bodo
    2014 IEEE 40TH PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALIST CONFERENCE (PVSC), 2014, : 885 - 890
  • [49] Research Challenges and Opportunities of Utility-Scale Hybrid Power Plants
    Das, Kaushik
    Hansen, Anca D.
    Leon, Juan Pablo Murcia
    Zhu, Rujie
    Gupta, Megha
    Perez-Rua, Juan-Andres
    Long, Qian
    Pombo, Daniel V.
    Barlas, Athanasios
    Gocmen, Tuhfe
    Sogachev, Andrey
    Koivisto, Matti
    Cutululis, Nicolaos A.
    Sorensen, Poul E.
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [50] Using GIS analytics and social preference data to evaluate utility-scale solar power site suitability
    Brewer, Justin
    Ames, Daniel P.
    Solan, David
    Lee, Randy
    Carlisle, Juliet
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 81 : 825 - 836