Minimising the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services in an intact landscape under risk of rapid agricultural development

被引:45
|
作者
Williams, Brooke A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Grantham, Hedley S. [2 ]
Watson, James E. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Alvarez, Silvia J. [4 ]
Simmonds, Jeremy S. [1 ]
Rogeliz, Carlos A. [5 ]
Da Silva, Mayesse [6 ]
Forero-Medina, German [4 ]
Etter, Andres [7 ]
Nogales, Jonathan [5 ]
Walschburger, Tomas [5 ]
Hyman, Glenn [6 ,8 ]
Beyer, Hawthorne L. [9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Global Conservat Program, New York, NY 10460 USA
[3] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[4] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Colombia Program, Cali, Colombia
[5] Nature Conservancy, Calle 67 7-84 Piso 3, Bogota 110231, Colombia
[6] Int Ctr Trop Agr, Km 17 Recta Cali Palmira, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia
[7] Pontificia Univ Javeriana, Fac Estudios Ambientales & Rurales, Bogota, Colombia
[8] Spatial Informat Grp, Cali, Colombia
[9] Univ Queensland, Global Change Inst, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
关键词
land use planning; trade-offs; multiple objectives; conservation; ecosystem services; biodiversity; agricultural development; LAND-USE; IMPACTS; CONSERVATION; COLOMBIA; MANAGEMENT; GAINS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ff7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As humanity's demand for resources continues to rise and productive arable lands become increasingly scarce, many of Earth's remaining intact regions are at heightened risk of destruction from agricultural development. In situations where agricultural expansion is inevitable, it is important to manage intact landscape transformation so that impacts on environmental values are minimised. Here, we present a novel, spatially explicit, land use planning framework that addresses the decision making needed to account for different, competing economic-environment objectives (agricultural production value, biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service retention) when land use change is inevitable within an intact landscape. We apply our framework to the globally significant savannahs of the Orinoquia (Colombia), which in a post-conflict era is under increased agricultural development pressure. We show that while negative environmental impacts can be reduced through planning, the total area of land converted to agriculture is the unavoidable principal driver of biodiversity and ecosystem service loss. We therefore identify planning solutions that perform well across all objectives simultaneously, despite trade-offs among them. When 15%, 20%, 30% and 40% of the study area is allowed to be converted to agriculture, on average planning can improve species persistence and ecosystem service retention by up to 16%, 15%, 12%, and 9%, respectively, when compared to agricultural-focused solutions. Development in the region so far has had an unnecessarily large impact on environmental objectives due to a lack of effective land use planning, creating an 'opportunity debt'. Our study provides an evidence base to inform proactive planning and the development of environmentally sensible agricultural development policy and practice in the region. This framework can be used by stakeholders to achieve agriculture expansion goals and maximise economic profit while minimising impacts on the environment in the Orinoquia, or any relatively intact region that is being developed.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecosystem services and biodiversity of agricultural systems at the landscape scale
    Sonoko D. Bellingrath-Kimura
    Benjamin Burkhard
    Brendan Fisher
    Bettina Matzdorf
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193
  • [2] Ecosystem services and biodiversity of agricultural systems at the landscape scale
    Bellingrath-Kimura, Sonoko D.
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Fisher, Brendan
    Matzdorf, Bettina
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (SUPPL 1)
  • [3] Restoration of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Land
    Rey Benayas, Jose M.
    Bullock, James M.
    ECOSYSTEMS, 2012, 15 (06) : 883 - 899
  • [4] Restoration of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on Agricultural Land
    José M. Rey Benayas
    James M. Bullock
    Ecosystems, 2012, 15 : 883 - 899
  • [5] Landscape indicators - Monitoring of biodiversity and ecosystem services at landscape level
    Walz, Ulrich
    Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 94 : 1 - 5
  • [6] Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services
    Worm, Boris
    Barbier, Edward B.
    Beaumont, Nicola
    Duffy, J. Emmett
    Folke, Carl
    Halpern, Benjamin S.
    Jackson, Jeremy B. C.
    Lotze, Heike K.
    Micheli, Fiorenza
    Palumbi, Stephen R.
    Sala, Enric
    Selkoe, Kimberley A.
    Stachowicz, John J.
    Watson, Reg
    SCIENCE, 2006, 314 (5800) : 787 - 790
  • [7] Landscape-scale management for biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Petit, Sandrine
    Landis, Douglas A.
    AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 347
  • [8] How Agricultural Intensification Affects Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services
    Emmerson, M.
    Morales, M. B.
    Onate, J. J.
    Batry, P.
    Berendse, F.
    Liira, J.
    Aavik, T.
    Guerrero, I.
    Bommarco, R.
    Eggers, S.
    Part, T.
    Tscharntke, T.
    Weisser, W.
    Clement, L.
    Bengtsson, J.
    ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, VOL 55: LARGE-SCALE ECOLOGY: MODEL SYSTEMS TO GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 55 : 43 - 97
  • [9] Importance of grasslands for biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Larsonneau, P.
    Uijttewaal, A.
    Gendre, S.
    FOURRAGES, 2024, (258):
  • [10] Impacts of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy "Greening" Reform on Agricultural Development, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services
    Hristov, Jordan
    Clough, Yann
    Sahlin, Ullrika
    Smith, Henrik G.
    Stjernman, Martin
    Olsson, Ola
    Sahrbacher, Amanda
    Brady, Mark V.
    APPLIED ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES AND POLICY, 2020, 42 (04) : 716 - 738