The effect of boundary conditions on the single-well push-pull test in a partially penetrated well

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Quanrong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Fac Engn, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, State Environm Protect Key Lab Source Apportionme, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Hubei Key Lab Yangtze River Basin Environm Aquat, East Lake High Tech Dev Zone, 68 Jincheng St, Wuhan 430078, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci, Sch Environm Studies, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Parameter estimation; Flow velocity; Wellbore storage; Radial dispersion; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; MASS-TRANSFER; POROUS-MEDIA; TRACER TESTS; FLOW; DISPERSION; GROUNDWATER; FRACTURE; LOSSES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127035
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Boundary conditions of well screen are critical for modeling reactive transport around a partially penetrated well in a single-well push-pull (SWPP) test. Previous SWPP test models often assumed that water flux was uniformly distributed along the well screen of the partially penetrated well, named the uniformly distributed flux boundary condition (UFBC). To investigate the influence of such an assumption on reactive transport in the SWPP test, we develop a new finite-difference numerical model under a flow field with a finite hydraulic diffusivity in this study, considering the wellbore storage. The uniformly distributed head boundary condition (UHBC) is employed for both groundwater flow and reactive transport across the well screen. The dispersion coefficients are in a tensor form, depending on both horizontal and vertical flow components. The results show that the UFBC model may cause non-negligible errors when modeling reactive transport in the SWPP test with a partially penetrated well. Such errors are obvious at the early stage of the extraction phase, but become negligible at late stage of the extraction phase. The UHBC solution for reactive transport is smaller than the UFBC solution at the middle of the well screen, but greater than the UFBC solution at the top or bottom of the well screen. Using the SWPP test to investigate the reactive transport in subsurface, in addition to the breakthrough curves (BTCs), the information of the flow field (like well geometry information and the observed time-drawdown data) is necessary and could be used to calibrate the model. Field application demonstrates that the UHBC model performs better than the UFBC model when interpreting BTCs of the SWPP test in the extraction phase. The findings of this study can help for better understanding of reactive transport in the SWPP test.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An improved analytical model for estimating ambient groundwater velocity from a single-well push-pull test through consideration of the velocity distortion zone
    Jiang, Leiyu
    Wen, Zhang
    Zhu, Qi
    Lan, Kaixuan
    Jakada, Hamza
    HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [32] Fractional Models Simulating Non-Fickian Behavior in Four-Stage Single-Well Push-Pull Tests
    Chen, Kewei
    Zhan, Hongbin
    Yang, Qiang
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2017, 53 (11) : 9528 - 9545
  • [33] Evaluating surfactant-enhanced nonaqueous phase (DNAPL) recovery using single-well "push-pull" tests.
    Field, JA
    Istok, JD
    Schroth, M
    Sawyer, TE
    Humphrey, MD
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1999, 218 : U1040 - U1040
  • [34] Assessing the activity and diversity of fumarate-fed denitrifying bacteria by performing field single-well push-pull tests
    Kim, Jin-Hoon
    Ha, Chul-Yoon
    Oa, Seong-Wook
    Lee, Jin-Woo
    Park, Sun-Hwa
    Kwon, Soo-Youl
    Kim, Sungpyo
    Kim, Young
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 46 (01): : 33 - 41
  • [35] Single-Well Push-Pull Tracer Test Analyses to Determine Aquifer Reactive Transport Parameters at a Former Uranium Mill Site (Grand Junction, Colorado)
    Johnson, Raymond H.
    Paradis, Charles J.
    Kent, Ronald D.
    Tigar, Aaron D.
    Reimus, Paul W.
    MINERALS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [36] Algorithm for estimating boundary conditions of a distributed tracer for application in a single-well tracer test
    Mukhutdinova, A. R.
    Bolotov, A., V
    Anikin, O., V
    Varfolomeev, M. A.
    GEORESURSY, 2022, 24 (04) : 75 - 81
  • [37] Single-well push-pull test for assessing potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality in a shallow Gulf Coast aquifer in Cranfield, Mississippi
    Yang, Changbing
    Mickler, Patrick J.
    Reedy, Robert
    Scanlon, Bridget R.
    Romanak, Katherine D.
    Nicot, Jean-Philippe
    Hovorka, Susan D.
    Trevino, Ramon H.
    Larson, Toti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2013, 18 : 375 - 387
  • [38] Use of single-well push–pull tracer tests to simulate a dynamic saltwater–freshwater interface
    K. H. Hebig
    N. Ito
    J. Tecklenburg
    I. Machida
    A. Marui
    T. Scheytt
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [39] Calculation Domain and Boundary Conditions for Push-Pull Ventilation
    ZhouYu
    WangYi
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT AND BUILDING MATERIAL, PTS 1-4, 2012, 374-377 : 419 - 424
  • [40] Estimating In Situ Biodegradation Rates of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Microbial Population Dynamics by Performing Single-Well Push-Pull Tests in a Fractured Bedrock Aquifer
    Cho, Yunchul
    Han, Kyungjin
    Kim, Namhee
    Park, Sunhwa
    Kim, Young
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2013, 224 (02):