Denitrification in a Deep Basalt Aquifer: Implications for Aquifer Storage and Recovery

被引:1
|
作者
Nelson, Dennis [1 ]
Melady, Jason [1 ]
机构
[1] GSI Water Solutions Inc, Portland, OR 97204 USA
关键词
GROUNDWATER; NITROGEN;
D O I
10.1111/gwat.12082
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) can provide a means of storing water for irrigation in agricultural areas where water availability is limited. A concern, however, is that the injected water may lead to a degradation of groundwater quality. In many agricultural areas, nitrate is a limiting factor. In the Umatilla Basin in north central Oregon, shallow alluvial groundwater with elevated nitrate-nitrogen of <3 mg/L to >9 mg/L is injected into the Columbia River Basalt Group (CRBG), a transmissive confined aquifer(s) with low natural recharge rates. Once recovery of the injected water begins, however, NO3-N in the recovered water decreases quickly to <3 mg/L (Eaton et al. 2009), suggesting that NO3-N may not persist within the CRBG during ASR storage. In contrast to NO3-N, other constituents in the recovered water show little variation, inconsistent with migration or simple mixing as an explanation of the NO3-N decrease. Nitrogen isotopic ratios (delta N-15) increase markedly, ranging from +3.5 to > +50, and correlate inversely with NO3-N concentrations. This variation occurs in <3 weeks and recovery of <10% of the originally injected volume. TOC is low in the basalt aquifer, averaging <1.5 mg/L, but high in the injected source water, averaging >3.0 mg/L. Similar to nitrate concentrations, TOC drops in the recovered water, consistent with this component contributing to the denitrification of nitrate during storage.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 423
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fate of organic matter during aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) of reclaimed water in a carbonate aquifer
    Vanderzalm, J. L.
    La Salle, C. Le Gal
    Dillon, P. J.
    [J]. APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 21 (07) : 1204 - 1215
  • [32] Water quality changes during aquifer storage recovery in limestone-silicate aquifer material
    Mirecki, J
    Petkewich, MD
    Conlon, KJ
    Campbell, BG
    [J]. WATER-ROCK INTERACTION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2001, : 189 - 192
  • [33] VERTICAL CONTAMINANT PROFILING OF VOLATILE ORGANICS IN A DEEP FRACTURED BASALT AQUIFER
    KAMINSKY, JF
    WYLIE, AH
    [J]. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND REMEDIATION, 1995, 15 (02): : 97 - 103
  • [34] Impacts of Heterogeneity on Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Saline Aquifers
    Li, Hongkai
    Lu, Chunhui
    Werner, Adrian D.
    Irvine, Dylan J.
    Luo, Jian
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2022, 58 (05)
  • [35] Lessons learned from an aquifer storage and recovery program
    Rydman, Dave
    [J]. JOURNAL AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION, 2012, 104 (09): : 52 - 57
  • [36] Hydrogeophysical Methods for Analyzing Aquifer Storage and Recovery Systems
    Minsley, Burke J.
    Ajo-Franklin, Jonathan
    Mukhopadhyay, Amitabha
    Morgan, Frank Dale
    [J]. GROUND WATER, 2011, 49 (02) : 250 - 269
  • [37] An Integrated Site Selection Criterion for Aquifer Storage and Recovery
    Sharma, Prabhakar
    Verma, Anurag
    Sharma, Aviram
    Verma, Poornima
    Bandyopadhyay, Somnath
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (05)
  • [38] Review of aquifer storage and recovery opportunities and challenges in India
    Satiprasad Sahoo
    Chiranjit Singha
    Ajit Govind
    Prabhakar Sharma
    [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2025, 84 (5)
  • [39] The arsenic problem during Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR)
    Pichler, T
    Arthur, JD
    Price, RE
    Jones, GW
    [J]. GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2004, 68 (11) : A520 - A520
  • [40] Lessons learned from an aquifer storage and recovery program
    [J]. Rydman, D. (drydman@carollo.com), 1600, American Water Works Association (104):