Where is procedural meaning located? Evidence from discourse connectives and tenses

被引:10
|
作者
Moeschler, Jacques [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Dept Linguist, 5 Rue Candolle, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Tenses; Connectives; Procedural meaning; Semantics-pragmatics interface; Entailment; Explicature; Implicature;
D O I
10.1016/j.lingua.2015.11.006
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
The main goal of this article is to make a proposal about where procedural meaning is located. Procedural meaning is defined as guiding the processing of conceptual information, whereas conceptual meaning includes information about the representation of entities, for instance objects or events. Conceptual information for connectives is described at the level of entailment, explicature and implicature, and may indicate possible causal relations among the events described, whereas procedural information for causal connectives is restricted to indicating the direction of the causal relation (forward or backward). Conceptual information for tenses specifies temporal coordinates, while procedural meaning specifies directional and subjective properties of events, using features such as [ narrative] or [ subjective]. A second goal is to answer a central question for pragmatics: what is the contribution of connectives, that is, what is the difference between discourses with and without connectives? The pragmatic framework adopted, which is based on Relevance Theory, gives the following answer: in a discourse without connectives, the accessibility of the intended interpretation depends solely on the context, whereas the use of connectives allows a simpler route, reducing the number of inferential steps and helping to determine semantic and pragmatic contents such as entailments, explicatures and implicatures. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 138
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Where does the evidence come from?
    Jorgensen, LGM
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2006, 44 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [42] Evidence of venous suction, but from where?
    Miller, JD
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (02) : 776 - 776
  • [43] Procedural Fairness and Taxpayers' Response: Evidence from an Experiment
    Jun, Byung-hill
    Cho, Myeonghwan
    Park, Myung-Ho
    KOREAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 31 (02): : 301 - 326
  • [44] Discourse and event: the production of meaning effects from the words of Pope Francis
    Carmo, Andreia Nascimento
    de Melo, Marcio Araujo
    Rosa de Melian, Valdivina Telia
    DIALOGO DAS LETRAS, 2022, 11
  • [45] From lexical to pragmatic meaning: Contrastive markers in spoken Chinese discourse
    Wang, YF
    TEXT, 2005, 25 (04): : 469 - 518
  • [46] THE ROLE OF INTERCLAUSAL CONNECTIVES IN NARRATIVE STRUCTURING - EVIDENCE FROM ADULTS INTERPRETATIONS OF SIMPLE STORIES
    SEGAL, EM
    DUCHAN, JF
    SCOTT, PJ
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 1991, 14 (01) : 27 - 54
  • [47] From numbers to discourse and action: Visualizing meaning through data as it happens
    Funk, Clayton
    Castro, Juan Carlos
    VISUAL INQUIRY-LEARNING & TEACHING ART, 2015, 4 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [48] Preserving meaning of evidence from evolving systems
    Spichiger, Hannes
    Adelstein, Frank
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-DIGITAL INVESTIGATION, 2025, 52
  • [49] On discourse markers: Evidence from modern Greek
    Archakis, A
    JOURNAL OF PRAGMATICS, 2001, 33 (08) : 1235 - 1261
  • [50] SCHEMATIC UNDERSTANDING - EVIDENCE FROM ALZHEIMERS DISCOURSE
    RAMANATHAN, V
    COMMUNICATION THEORY, 1995, 5 (03) : 224 - 247