PEEK Cages in Lumbar Fusion Mid-term Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Fusion

被引:35
|
作者
Schimmel, Janneke J. P. [1 ]
Poeschmann, Marcel S. [1 ]
Horsting, Philip P. [1 ]
Schonfeld, Dirk H. W. [1 ]
van Limbeek, Jacques [1 ]
Pavlov, Paul W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin Nijmegen, POB 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage; pseudoarthrosis; Synfix-LR; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTERBODY FUSION; FOLLOW-UP; SPINE; ARTHRODESIS; DISABILITY; FIXATION; DISEASE; BAGBY;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf74
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Historical cohort analysis. Objective: Evaluation of mid-term clinical outcome and radiologic fusion in patients treated with a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Summary of Background Data: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion can be a good alternative in chronic low back pain when conservative treatment fails. Although titanium alloy cages give good fusion rates, disadvantages are the subsidence of the cage in the adjacent vertebrae and problematic radiologic evaluation of fusion. PEEK cages such as the Synfix-LR cage (Synthes, Switzerland) should overcome this. Methods: From December 2004 until August 2007, 95 patients (21 double-level and 74 single-level) with degenerative disk disease from L3-S1 were operated by a single surgeon. The number of reoperations was counted. Radiologic fusion on computed tomography scan was scored with a new scoring system by an independent skeletal radiologist and orthopedic surgeon. Intraobserver agreement and specificity were assessed. Clinical improvement was measured by the Oswestry Disability Index score. The median duration of clinical follow-up was 47.7 months (range 29.9-61.6). Results: In total, 26 patients were reoperated after a median period of 17.6 months (range 6.7-46.9) of the initial surgery. Of the 26 patients, 23 patients (18 single-level and 5 double-level) were reoperated for symptomatic pseudarthrosis. A moderate agreement (kappa = 0.36) and a specificity of 70% and 37% for the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon, respectively, were found for scoring bony bridging. The Oswestry Disability Index score improved after initial surgery; however, reoperated patients reported a significantly lower improvement. Conclusions: A high number of reoperations after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure with the Synfix-LR cage were found, mainly because of symptomatic pseudarthrosis. The absence of posterior fixation in combination with lower stiffness and the hydrophobic characteristics of PEEK probably lead to insufficient initial stability, creating suboptimal conditions for bony bridging, and thus solid fusion. The proposed ease of the evaluation of radiologic fusion could not be supported. Clinicians should be alert on pseudarthrosis when patients treated with the Synfix-LR cage presented with persisted or aggravated complaints.
引用
收藏
页码:E252 / E258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages
    Ehab Shiban
    Karina Gapon
    Maria Wostrack
    Bernhard Meyer
    Jens Lehmberg
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2016, 158 : 349 - 355
  • [22] Degenerative spondylolisthesis of the fourth lumbar vertebra -: Mid-term results of undercutting decompression and transpedicular fusion in 44 patients
    Plötz, GMJ
    Kramer, M
    Prymka, M
    Benini, A
    NEURO-ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 27 (1-2): : 15 - 36
  • [23] Retroperitoneal lateral lumbar interbody fusion with titanium threaded fusion cages
    Wolfla, CE
    Maiman, DJ
    Coufal, FJ
    Wallace, JR
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 96 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [24] PEEK versus titanium-coated PEEK cervical cages: fusion rate
    Godlewski, Bartosz
    Bebenek, Adam
    Dominiak, Maciej
    Karpinski, Grzegorz
    Cieslik, Piotr
    Pawelczyk, Tomasz
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2022, 164 (06) : 1501 - 1507
  • [25] PEEK versus titanium-coated PEEK cervical cages: fusion rate
    Bartosz Godlewski
    Adam Bebenek
    Maciej Dominiak
    Grzegorz Karpinski
    Piotr Cieslik
    Tomasz Pawelczyk
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2022, 164 : 1501 - 1507
  • [26] Interbody metal implants ("cages") for lumbar fusion
    von Salis-Soglio, GF
    Scholz, R
    Seller, K
    ORTHOPADE, 2005, 34 (10): : 1033 - 1039
  • [27] Microsurgical lumbar spondylodesis with intervertebral fusion cages
    Kaech, DL
    Jinkins, JR
    Lutolf, M
    Knutti, O
    Wernli, F
    Zambaz, BD
    RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA, 1998, 11 (03): : 373 - 383
  • [28] Mid-Term Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis Mismatch
    Nagamoto, Yukitaka
    Okuda, Shinya
    Matsumoto, Tomiya
    Takahashi, Yoshifumi
    Furuya, Masayuki
    Iwasaki, Motoki
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 183 : E796 - E800
  • [29] Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis
    Anand, Neel
    Rosemann, Rebecca
    Khalsa, Bhavraj
    Baron, Eli M.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (03)
  • [30] Titanium (Ti) cages may be superior to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal interbody fusions using Ti versus PEEK cages
    Tan, Jun-Hao
    Cheong, Chin Kai
    Hey, Hwee Weng Dennis
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (05) : 1285 - 1295