PEEK Cages in Lumbar Fusion Mid-term Clinical Outcome and Radiologic Fusion

被引:35
|
作者
Schimmel, Janneke J. P. [1 ]
Poeschmann, Marcel S. [1 ]
Horsting, Philip P. [1 ]
Schonfeld, Dirk H. W. [1 ]
van Limbeek, Jacques [1 ]
Pavlov, Paul W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sint Maartensklin Nijmegen, POB 9011, NL-6500 GM Nijmegen, Netherlands
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2016年 / 29卷 / 05期
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage; pseudoarthrosis; Synfix-LR; LOW-BACK-PAIN; INTERBODY FUSION; FOLLOW-UP; SPINE; ARTHRODESIS; DISABILITY; FIXATION; DISEASE; BAGBY;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31826eaf74
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Historical cohort analysis. Objective: Evaluation of mid-term clinical outcome and radiologic fusion in patients treated with a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage. Summary of Background Data: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion can be a good alternative in chronic low back pain when conservative treatment fails. Although titanium alloy cages give good fusion rates, disadvantages are the subsidence of the cage in the adjacent vertebrae and problematic radiologic evaluation of fusion. PEEK cages such as the Synfix-LR cage (Synthes, Switzerland) should overcome this. Methods: From December 2004 until August 2007, 95 patients (21 double-level and 74 single-level) with degenerative disk disease from L3-S1 were operated by a single surgeon. The number of reoperations was counted. Radiologic fusion on computed tomography scan was scored with a new scoring system by an independent skeletal radiologist and orthopedic surgeon. Intraobserver agreement and specificity were assessed. Clinical improvement was measured by the Oswestry Disability Index score. The median duration of clinical follow-up was 47.7 months (range 29.9-61.6). Results: In total, 26 patients were reoperated after a median period of 17.6 months (range 6.7-46.9) of the initial surgery. Of the 26 patients, 23 patients (18 single-level and 5 double-level) were reoperated for symptomatic pseudarthrosis. A moderate agreement (kappa = 0.36) and a specificity of 70% and 37% for the radiologist and orthopedic surgeon, respectively, were found for scoring bony bridging. The Oswestry Disability Index score improved after initial surgery; however, reoperated patients reported a significantly lower improvement. Conclusions: A high number of reoperations after an anterior lumbar interbody fusion procedure with the Synfix-LR cage were found, mainly because of symptomatic pseudarthrosis. The absence of posterior fixation in combination with lower stiffness and the hydrophobic characteristics of PEEK probably lead to insufficient initial stability, creating suboptimal conditions for bony bridging, and thus solid fusion. The proposed ease of the evaluation of radiologic fusion could not be supported. Clinicians should be alert on pseudarthrosis when patients treated with the Synfix-LR cage presented with persisted or aggravated complaints.
引用
收藏
页码:E252 / E258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcome of Ti/PEEK Versus PEEK Cages in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Yao, Yu-Cheng
    Chou, Po-Hsin
    Lin, Hsi-Hsien
    Wang, Shih-Tien
    Chang, Ming-Chau
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 13 (02) : 472 - 478
  • [2] Mid-term outcome after fusion due to isthmic spondylolysis
    Ivanic, Gerd M.
    Pink, Peter T.
    Ziegler, Sven
    Harter, Bernd
    Schneider, Frank
    Plattner, Florian
    Homann, Nikolaus C.
    WIENER MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2007, 157 (1-2) : 16 - 20
  • [3] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with a novel osteoinductive allograft - Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes
    Faulks, Charlie R.
    Biddau, Dean T.
    Selby, Michael D.
    Mobbs, Ralph J.
    Malham, Gregory M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY-X, 2025, 26
  • [4] PEEK versus metal cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiological comparative study
    Cuzzocrea F.
    Ivone A.
    Jannelli E.
    Fioruzzi A.
    Ferranti E.
    Vanelli R.
    Benazzo F.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2019, 103 (3) : 237 - 241
  • [5] Outcome of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Study of Clinical and Radiologic Parameters
    Pinson, Harry
    Hallaert, Giorgio
    Herregodts, Patrick
    Everaert, Karel
    Couvreur, Tim
    Caemaert, Jacques
    Kalala, Jean-Pierre
    Van Roost, Dirk
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 103 : 772 - 779
  • [6] Lumbar interbody fusion utilizing fusion cages
    Hambly, MF
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 168 (02): : 123 - 124
  • [7] Comparison of the mid-term clinical efficacy of different fixtaion methods combined with oblique lumbar interbody fusion in treating lumbar degenerative diseases
    Yu, Yang
    Wang, Yongtao
    Xie, Yizhou
    Feng, Chengzhi
    Chen, Yuzhou
    Xu, Jiajia
    Fan, Xiaohong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 31 (03)
  • [8] PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence
    Campbell, Peter G.
    Cavanaugh, David A.
    Nunley, Pierce
    Utter, Philip A.
    Kerr, Eubulus
    Wadhwa, Rishi
    Stone, Marcus
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2020, 49 (03) : 1 - 9
  • [9] Clinical and radiologic assessment for anterior cervical interbody fusion with synthetic cages
    Shin, Seung-Ho
    Lee, Woo-Jong
    Eun, Jong-Pil
    Choi, Ha-Young
    Lee, Jung-Chung
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2007, 41 (02) : 105 - 110
  • [10] Radiological evaluation of anterior lumbar fusion using PEEK cages with adjacent vertebral autograft in spinal deformity long fusion surgeries
    Ni, Jianqiang
    Zheng, Yanping
    Liu, Ning
    Wang, Xin
    Fang, Xiutong
    Phukan, Rishabh
    Wood, Kirkham B.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (04) : 791 - 799