The Amsterdam UMC protocol for computer-assisted mandibular and maxillary reconstruction; A cadaveric study

被引:1
|
作者
van Baar, Gustaaf J. C. [1 ,2 ]
Lodders, Johannes N. [1 ,2 ]
Chhangur, Chayenne [1 ,2 ]
Leeuwrik, Lars [1 ,2 ]
Forouzanfar, Tymour [1 ,2 ]
Liberton, Niels P. T. J. [3 ]
Berkhout, W. Erwin R. [4 ]
Winters, Henri A. H. [5 ]
Leusink, Frank K. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Pathol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Med Technol, 3D Innovat Lab, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Hand Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Maxillofacial Reconstruction; Fibula Free Flap; Surgery; Computer-Assisted; Dental Implant; Cadaver; Accuracy; FIBULA-FREE FLAPS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; VASCULARIZED FIBULA; REHABILITATION; ACCURACY; DEFECTS; SURGERY; HEAD; PLACEMENT; MORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106050
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: In this cadaveric study, the accuracy of CAS guided mandibular and maxillary reconstruction including immediate dental implant placement in different Brown defect classes is assessed. Materials and methods: The virtual planning and surgical procedure was conducted according to a newly proposed Amsterdam UMC reconstruction protocol. Postoperative evaluation was performed according to a previously proposed evaluation guideline. Results: Fourteen mandibular and 6 maxillary reconstructions were performed. Average mandibular angle deviations were 1.52 degrees +/- 1.32, 1.85 degrees +/- 1.58, 1.37 degrees +/- 1.09, 1.78 degrees +/- 1.37, 2.43 degrees +/- 1.52 and 2.83 degrees +/- 2.37, respectively for the left and right axial angles, left and right coronal angles and left and right sagittal angles. A total of 62 dental implants were placed in neomandibles with an average dXYZ values of 3.68 +/- 2.21 mm and 16 in neomaxillas with an average dXYZ values of 3.24 +/- 1.7 mm. Conclusion: Promising levels of accuracy were achieved for all mandibular angles. Dental implant positions approached the preoperative preferred positions well, within the margin to manufacture prosthetic devices.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Computer-assisted primary mandibular reconstruction
    Modabber, A.
    Ayoub, N.
    Steiner, T.
    Ghassemi, A.
    Hoelzle, F.
    MKG-CHIRURG, 2013, 6 (03): : 228 - 232
  • [2] Is a computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing method for mandibular reconstruction economically viable?
    Tarsitano, Achille
    Battaglia, Salvatore
    Crimi, Salvatore
    Ciocca, Leonardo
    Scotti, Roberto
    Marchetti, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 44 (07) : 795 - 799
  • [3] Surgical Margins After Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study
    Crosetti, Erika
    Succo, Giovanni
    Battiston, Bruno
    D'Addabbo, Federica
    Tascone, Martina
    Maldi, Elena
    Bertotto, Ilaria
    Berrone, Mattia
    FRONTIERS IN ORAL HEALTH, 2022, 2
  • [4] Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.
    Schipper, Kitty
    Forouzanfar, Tymour
    Leeuwrik, Lars
    Winters, Henri A. H.
    Ridwan-Pramana, Angela
    Leusink, Frank K. J.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (06) : 1 - 13
  • [5] The role of surgical navigation in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: is it necessary?
    Soh, Hui Yuh
    Shen, Shi Yue
    Yu, Yao
    Liu, Shuo
    Hu, Lei Hao
    Peng, Xin
    Zhang, Wen Bo
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2024, 29 (06): : e806 - e814
  • [6] Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A systematic review
    van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.
    Forouzanfar, Tymour
    Liberton, Niels P. T. J.
    Winters, Henri A. H.
    Leusink, Frank K. J.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 84 : 52 - 60
  • [7] A Comprehensive Approach for Measuring Spatial Deviations of Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction
    Yang, Wei-fa
    Yu, Peirong
    Zhu, Wang-yong
    Choi, Wing Shan
    Pu, Jingya Jane
    Su, Yu-xiong
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 149 (03) : 500E - 510E
  • [8] Computer-assisted Mandibular Reconstruction with Vascularized Iliac Crest Bone Graft
    Modabber, Ali
    Gerressen, Marcus
    Stiller, Maria Barbara
    Noroozi, Nelson
    Fueglein, Alexander
    Hoelzle, Frank
    Riediger, Dieter
    Ghassemi, Alireza
    AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 36 (03) : 653 - 659
  • [9] Computer-assisted navigation: its role in intraoperatively accurate mandibular reconstruction
    Wu, Jinyang
    Sun, Jian
    Shen, Steve Guofang
    Xu, Bing
    Li, Jun
    Zhang, Shilei
    Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology, 2016, 122 (02): : 134 - 142
  • [10] Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in mandibular reconstruction: A postoperative evaluation guideline
    van Baar, Gustaaf J. C.
    Liberton, Niels P. T. J.
    Forouzanfar, Tymour
    Winters, Henri A. H.
    Leusink, Frank K. J.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 88 : 1 - 8