Decisional regret in women receiving high risk or inconclusive prenatal cell-free DNA screening results

被引:17
|
作者
Gammon, Betsy L. [1 ,2 ]
Jaramillo, Carolina [1 ,4 ]
Riggan, Kirsten A. [1 ]
Allyse, Megan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE | 2020年 / 33卷 / 08期
关键词
High-risk; inconclusive; noninvasive prenatal testing; pretest counseling; MATERNAL PLASMA; FETAL SEX; ANEUPLOIDY; DIAGNOSIS; EXPERIENCE; STATEMENT; POSITION; FRACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2018.1519541
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study examined the experiences of women receiving high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, with particular focus on decisional satisfaction after receiving high-risk, false, or inconclusive results. It is already known that cell-free DNA screening is rapidly expanding in the clinical practice. A growing number of women are offered cfDNA screening for an increasingly broad range of chromosomal and microdeletion syndromes. However, research shows that the very low false positive rate attributed to cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 does not apply to other conditions. Methods: As a part of the larger study on patient experiences, 40 semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with women who were, or had recently been, pregnant and received high-risk (n = 15), false positive/negative (n = 20), or inconclusive (n = 5) results from cfDNA screening. Results: One third of participants would not elect to have cfDNA screening in a future pregnancy, and another third would only have the screen under particular circumstances or if the scope of the panel was limited. Many women reported feeling misled by the information they received prior to accepting cfDNA screening or receiving their results. Conclusions: Study participants described issues with the clinical dialog when cfDNA screening is offered; when results are returned; and problems with the availability of information about the existence of false positives. These reports suggest that inadequate pretest discussion contributes to women's experience of decisional regret after receiving high-risk, false positive, or inconclusive results. Given the confusion about cfDNA screening accuracy, the prevalence of follow-up invasive tests, and the number of women who reported that they regretted choosing cfDNA screening, the mode of offering cfDNA should be reassessed.
引用
收藏
页码:1412 / 1418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma for Noninvasive Prenatal Screening
    Wagner, Amy J.
    Mitchell, Michael E.
    Tomita-Mitchell, Aoy
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (04) : 957 - +
  • [22] Assessment of a Simplified Cell-Free DNA Method for Prenatal Down Syndrome Screening
    Palomaki, Glenn E.
    Eklund, Elizabeth E.
    Kloza, Edward M.
    Lambert-Messerlian, Geralyn M.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 68 (11) : 1449 - 1458
  • [23] Test failure in prenatal cell-free DNA aneuploidy screening: nonreportable, but not nonsignificant
    Pan, Min
    Li, Yang-Yue
    Li, Dong-Zhi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 229 (04) : 474 - 475
  • [24] Patient experiences with prenatal cell-free DNA screening in a safety net setting
    Riggan, Kirsten A.
    Barwise, Amelia
    Yap, Jane Q.
    Condon, Niamh
    Allyse, Megan A.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2024, 44 (04) : 409 - 417
  • [25] Prospective prenatal cell-free DNA screening for genetic conditions of heterogenous etiologies
    Zhang, Jinglan
    Wu, Yanting
    Chen, Songchang
    Luo, Qiong
    Xi, Hui
    Li, Jianli
    Qin, Xiaomei
    Peng, Ying
    Ma, Na
    Yang, Bingxin
    Qiu, Xiang
    Lu, Weiliang
    Chen, Yuan
    Jiang, Ying
    Chen, Panpan
    Liu, Yifeng
    Zhang, Chen
    Zhang, Zhiwei
    Xiong, Yu
    Shen, Jie
    Liang, Huan
    Ren, Yunyun
    Ying, Chunmei
    Dong, Minyue
    Li, Xiaotian
    Xu, Congjian
    Wang, Hua
    Zhang, Dan
    Xu, Chenming
    Huang, Hefeng
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (03) : 470 - 479
  • [26] Contingent prenatal screening for frequent aneuploidies with cell-free fetal DNA analysis
    Torres Aguilar, M. Rosario
    Carrasco Salas, Pilar
    Santos Rosa, Cristina
    Bueno Rodriguez, Guadalupe
    Martinez-Bonet, Eduardo
    Carreto Alba, Praxedes
    Leon-Justel, Antonio
    Granell Escobar, M. Reyes
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 60 (04): : 745 - 751
  • [27] Prospective prenatal cell-free DNA screening for genetic conditions of heterogenous etiologies
    Jinglan Zhang
    Yanting Wu
    Songchang Chen
    Qiong Luo
    Hui Xi
    Jianli Li
    Xiaomei Qin
    Ying Peng
    Na Ma
    Bingxin Yang
    Xiang Qiu
    Weiliang Lu
    Yuan Chen
    Ying Jiang
    Panpan Chen
    Yifeng Liu
    Chen Zhang
    Zhiwei Zhang
    Yu Xiong
    Jie Shen
    Huan Liang
    Yunyun Ren
    Chunmei Ying
    Minyue Dong
    Xiaotian Li
    Congjian Xu
    Hua Wang
    Dan Zhang
    Chenming Xu
    Hefeng Huang
    Nature Medicine, 2024, 30 : 470 - 479
  • [28] Maternal chromosome Xp deletion identified by prenatal cell-free DNA screening
    Ilagan, Bernard J.
    Maxwell, Megan D.
    Fisher, Barbra M.
    Milanovich, Jeri
    Owen, Renius
    Anderson, Ben
    Zhang, Ke
    Strom, Charles M.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2017, 37 (09) : 935 - 937
  • [29] How can cell-free DNA screening best be incorporated into current prenatal screening algorithm?
    Jiang, Fan
    Li, Dong-Zhi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (01) : 126 - 127
  • [30] Evaluation of Amniocentesis Results in Patients With High-Risk Cell-Free Fetal DNA
    Jafari, Raziyeh Mohammad
    Masihi, Sara
    Galehdari, Hamid
    Najafian, Mahin
    Barati, Mojgan
    Khosravani, Maryam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2021,