Decisional regret in women receiving high risk or inconclusive prenatal cell-free DNA screening results

被引:17
|
作者
Gammon, Betsy L. [1 ,2 ]
Jaramillo, Carolina [1 ,4 ]
Riggan, Kirsten A. [1 ]
Allyse, Megan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Sch Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Obstet & Gynecol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
来源
关键词
High-risk; inconclusive; noninvasive prenatal testing; pretest counseling; MATERNAL PLASMA; FETAL SEX; ANEUPLOIDY; DIAGNOSIS; EXPERIENCE; STATEMENT; POSITION; FRACTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/14767058.2018.1519541
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study examined the experiences of women receiving high-risk cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, with particular focus on decisional satisfaction after receiving high-risk, false, or inconclusive results. It is already known that cell-free DNA screening is rapidly expanding in the clinical practice. A growing number of women are offered cfDNA screening for an increasingly broad range of chromosomal and microdeletion syndromes. However, research shows that the very low false positive rate attributed to cfDNA screening for trisomy 21 does not apply to other conditions. Methods: As a part of the larger study on patient experiences, 40 semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with women who were, or had recently been, pregnant and received high-risk (n = 15), false positive/negative (n = 20), or inconclusive (n = 5) results from cfDNA screening. Results: One third of participants would not elect to have cfDNA screening in a future pregnancy, and another third would only have the screen under particular circumstances or if the scope of the panel was limited. Many women reported feeling misled by the information they received prior to accepting cfDNA screening or receiving their results. Conclusions: Study participants described issues with the clinical dialog when cfDNA screening is offered; when results are returned; and problems with the availability of information about the existence of false positives. These reports suggest that inadequate pretest discussion contributes to women's experience of decisional regret after receiving high-risk, false positive, or inconclusive results. Given the confusion about cfDNA screening accuracy, the prevalence of follow-up invasive tests, and the number of women who reported that they regretted choosing cfDNA screening, the mode of offering cfDNA should be reassessed.
引用
收藏
页码:1412 / 1418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decisional Regret in Women Receiving High-Risk Results From Non-Invasive Prenatal Genetic Screening
    Allyse, Megan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 26S - 26S
  • [2] Implications of inconclusive results in prenatal maternal serum cell-free DNA testing
    Rajendran, S.
    Smet, M-E
    Chan, N.
    McLennan, A.
    Costa, F. D. S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 : 50 - 50
  • [3] Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy in pregnant women at average or high risk: Results from a large US clinical laboratory
    Guy, Carrie
    Haji-Sheikhi, Farnoosh
    Rowland, Charles M.
    Anderson, Ben
    Owen, Renius
    Lacbawan, Felicitas L.
    Alagia, Damian P.
    MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (03):
  • [4] Preeclampsia risk prediction from prenatal cell-free DNA screening
    Adil, Mohamed
    Kolarova, Teodora R.
    Doebley, Anna-Lisa
    Chen, Leah A.
    Tobey, Cara L.
    Galipeau, Patricia
    Rosen, Sam
    Yang, Michael
    Colbert, Brice
    Patton, Robert D.
    Persse, Thomas W.
    Kawelo, Erin
    Reichel, Jonathan B.
    Pritchard, Colin C.
    Akilesh, Shreeram
    Lockwood, Christina M.
    Ha, Gavin
    Shree, Raj
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2025, : 1312 - 1318
  • [5] Noninvasive prenatal screening using cell-free DNA
    Mladenka, Christine
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSE PRACTITIONERS, 2022, 34 (06) : 789 - 791
  • [6] Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA
    Wax, Joseph R.
    Chard, Renee
    Litton, Christian
    Pinette, Michael G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) : 879 - 880
  • [7] Performance of a cell-free DNA prenatal screening test, choice of prenatal procedure, and chromosome conditions identified during pregnancy after low-risk cell-free DNA screening
    Scarff, Katrina L. L.
    Flowers, Nicola
    Love, Clare J. J.
    Archibald, Alison D. D.
    Hunt, Clare E. E.
    Giouzeppos, Olivia
    Elliott, Justine
    Delatycki, Martin B. B.
    Pertile, Mark D. D.
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (02) : 213 - 225
  • [8] #36: Prenatal aneuploidy screening using cell-free DNA
    Blackwell, Sean
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Biggio, Joseph
    Caughey, Aaron
    Craigo, Sabrina
    Dashe, Jodi
    Gyamfi-Bannerman, Cynthia
    Hibbard, Judith
    Lo, Jamie
    Manuck, Tracy
    Norton, Mary
    Pacheco, Luis
    Plante, Lauren
    Pressman, Eva
    Riley, Laura
    Sciscione, Anthony
    Silverman, Neil
    Tuuli, Methodius
    Robinson, Christopher
    Saade, George
    Rajan, Priya
    Wendel, George
    Ecker, Jeffrey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (06) : 711 - 716
  • [9] A Paradigm Shift: Considerations in Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening
    Dines, Jennifer N.
    Eckel, Ashley M.
    Cheng, Edith Y.
    Lockwood, Christina M.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 2 (05): : 784 - 796