Trends in the environmental and economic sustainability of wastewater -based resource recovery: A review

被引:64
|
作者
Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy [1 ]
Rezaei, Nader [1 ,2 ]
Ndiaye, Awa [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENG 030, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Madison Metropolitan Sewerage Dist, 1610 Moorland Rd, Madison, WI 53713 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Univ Ctr Environm, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE TREATMENT; URINE SOURCE SEPARATION; TREATMENT PLANTS; TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES; ENERGY RECOVERY; REUSE SYSTEMS; STRUVITE PRECIPITATION; TERTIARY-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121598
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wastewater is rich with valuable resources available for recovery. Although the resource recovery process can enable the offset of freshwater withdrawals, fertilizer production, and the use of fossil fuels, it comes at a cost. This review focuses on the environmental and economic impacts of recovering water, energy, and nutrients from wastewater. Specifically, life cycle assessments and life cycle cost analyses were reviewed to identify trends in wastewater-based resource recovery systems. Process conditions were found to have a significant influence on impacts in some instances. For example, the operating temperature for incineration could lower or eliminate N2O emissions altogether, while the flow rate and cold water temperature resulted in heat transfer efficiencies for thermal energy recovery systems ranging from ∼12% to 92%. Economies of scale were largely present in the processing of wastewater and biosolids, however, the re-distribution of reclaimed water exhibited diseconomies of scale as water networks increased in service size. This led to some studies exhibiting lower impacts for centralized systems, while others favored decentralization. Nonetheless, when averaged and categorized by scale, the greenhouse gas emissions for large-scale water reclamation systems (280 kg CO2-eq/person-year) was significantly lower than medium- and small-scale systems (4600 and 23740 kg CO2-eq/person-year, respectively). Future research is recommended in analyzing understudied technologies (e.g., environmental assessments of thermal energy recovery systems and wastewater-based hydropower technologies), investigating spatial-temporal contexts, and optimizing wastewater systems with multiple forms of resource recovery technologies across varied scales. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct membrane filtration for wastewater treatment and resource recovery: A review
    Hube, Selina
    Eskafi, Majid
    Hrafnkelsdottir, Kolbrun Frida
    Bjarnadottir, Bjorg
    Bjarnadottir, Margret Asta
    Axelsdottir, Snaeros
    Wu, Bing
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 710
  • [32] Biochar and environmental sustainability: Emerging trends and techno-economic perspectives
    Khan, Nawaz
    Chowdhary, Pankaj
    Gnansounou, Edgard
    Chaturvedi, Preeti
    [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2021, 332
  • [33] Microalgae-based wastewater treatment for developing economic and environmental sustainability: Current status and future prospects
    Srimongkol, Piroonporn
    Sangtanoo, Papassara
    Songserm, Pajareeya
    Watsuntorn, Wannapawn
    Karnchanatat, Aphichart
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN BIOENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 10
  • [34] Biochar and environmental sustainability: Emerging trends and techno-economic perspectives
    Khan, Nawaz
    Chowdhary, Pankaj
    Gnansounou, Edgard
    Chaturvedi, Preeti
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 332
  • [35] An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery
    Capa, Seda
    Ozdemir, Alp
    Gunkaya, Zerrin
    Ozkan, Aysun
    Banar, Mufide
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2022, 49
  • [36] The Sustainability of Industrial Hemp: A Literature Review of Its Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability
    Kaur, Gurinder
    Kander, Ronald
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [37] Environmental and economic sustainability
    Pope, Jenny
    [J]. IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2012, 30 (02) : 136 - 137
  • [38] Economic and environmental evaluation of nitrogen removal and recovery methods from wastewater
    Lin, Yanzi
    Guo, Miao
    Shah, Nilay
    Stuckey, David C.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 215 : 227 - 238
  • [39] Redesigning a food supply chain for environmental sustainability - An analysis of resource use and recovery
    Krishnan, Ramesh
    Agarwal, Renu
    Bajada, Christopher
    Arshinder, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 242
  • [40] Techno-economic analysis of resource recovery technologies for wastewater treatment plants
    Boiocchi, Riccardo
    Matafome, Beatriz
    Gargalo, Carina L.
    Carvalho, Ana
    Sin, Gurkan
    [J]. 27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2017, 40B : 1945 - 1950