Trends in the environmental and economic sustainability of wastewater -based resource recovery: A review

被引:64
|
作者
Diaz-Elsayed, Nancy [1 ]
Rezaei, Nader [1 ,2 ]
Ndiaye, Awa [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Qiong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 4202 E Fowler Ave,ENG 030, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Madison Metropolitan Sewerage Dist, 1610 Moorland Rd, Madison, WI 53713 USA
[3] Univ Oxford, Oxford Univ Ctr Environm, Sch Geog & Environm, South Parks Rd, Oxford OX1 3QY, England
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SEWAGE-SLUDGE TREATMENT; URINE SOURCE SEPARATION; TREATMENT PLANTS; TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES; ENERGY RECOVERY; REUSE SYSTEMS; STRUVITE PRECIPITATION; TERTIARY-TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121598
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wastewater is rich with valuable resources available for recovery. Although the resource recovery process can enable the offset of freshwater withdrawals, fertilizer production, and the use of fossil fuels, it comes at a cost. This review focuses on the environmental and economic impacts of recovering water, energy, and nutrients from wastewater. Specifically, life cycle assessments and life cycle cost analyses were reviewed to identify trends in wastewater-based resource recovery systems. Process conditions were found to have a significant influence on impacts in some instances. For example, the operating temperature for incineration could lower or eliminate N2O emissions altogether, while the flow rate and cold water temperature resulted in heat transfer efficiencies for thermal energy recovery systems ranging from ∼12% to 92%. Economies of scale were largely present in the processing of wastewater and biosolids, however, the re-distribution of reclaimed water exhibited diseconomies of scale as water networks increased in service size. This led to some studies exhibiting lower impacts for centralized systems, while others favored decentralization. Nonetheless, when averaged and categorized by scale, the greenhouse gas emissions for large-scale water reclamation systems (280 kg CO2-eq/person-year) was significantly lower than medium- and small-scale systems (4600 and 23740 kg CO2-eq/person-year, respectively). Future research is recommended in analyzing understudied technologies (e.g., environmental assessments of thermal energy recovery systems and wastewater-based hydropower technologies), investigating spatial-temporal contexts, and optimizing wastewater systems with multiple forms of resource recovery technologies across varied scales. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Recovery of precious metals from industrial wastewater towards resource recovery and environmental sustainability: A critical review
    Nakhjiri, Ali Taghvaie
    Sanaeepur, Hamidreza
    Amooghin, Abtin Ebadi
    Shirazi, Mohammad Mahdi A.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2022, 527
  • [2] Implications of implementation scale on the environmental sustainability of wastewater treatment with resource recovery
    Zhang, Qiong
    Cornejo, Pablo
    Mihelcic, James
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [3] Probabilistic evaluation of integrating resource recovery into wastewater treatment to improve environmental sustainability
    Wang, Xu
    McCarty, Perry L.
    Liu, Junxin
    Ren, Nan-Qi
    Lee, Duu-Jong
    Yu, Han-Qing
    Qian, Yi
    Qu, Jiuhui
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (05) : 1630 - 1635
  • [4] Technical, economic and environmental feasibility of resource recovery technologies from wastewater
    Yadav, Geetanjali
    Mishra, Arpit
    Ghosh, Parthasarathi
    Sindhu, Raveendran
    Vinayak, Vandana
    Pugazhendhi, Arivalagan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 796
  • [5] A critical review on cadmium recovery from wastewater towards environmental sustainability
    Mashhadikhan, Samaneh
    Amooghin, Abtin Ebadi
    Sanaeepur, Hamidreza
    Shirazi, Mohammad Mahdi A.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2022, 535
  • [6] How Does Scale of Implementation Impact the Environmental Sustainability of Wastewater Treatment Integrated with Resource Recovery?
    Cornejo, Pablo K.
    Zhang, Qiong
    Mihelcic, James R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (13) : 6680 - 6689
  • [7] Trends and resource recovery in biological wastewater treatment system
    Meena, Ramakrishnan Anu Alias
    Yukesh Kannah, R.
    Sindhu, J.
    Ragavi, J.
    Kumar, Gopalakrishnan
    Gunasekaran, M.
    Rajesh Banu, J.
    [J]. Bioresource Technology Reports, 2019, 7
  • [8] A Mini Review on the Integration of Resource Recovery from Wastewater into Sustainability of the Green Building Through Phycoremediation
    Yulistyorini, Anie
    [J]. GREEN CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2017, 1887
  • [9] Environmental Life Cycle Costing and Sustainability: Insights from Pollution Abatement and Resource Recovery in Wastewater Treatment
    Hall, Murray R.
    Priestley, Anthony
    Muster, Tim H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2018, 22 (05) : 1127 - 1138
  • [10] Mineral resource extraction and environmental sustainability for green recovery
    Lu, Man
    Zhao, Yue
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 90