Calibration of Noah Soil Hydraulic Property Parameters Using Surface Soil Moisture from SMOS and Basinwide In Situ Observations

被引:18
|
作者
Shellito, Peter J. [1 ]
Small, Eric E. [1 ]
Cosh, Michael H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado Boulder, Dept Geol Sci, UCB 399, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] ARS, Hydrol & Remote Sensing Lab, USDA, Beltsville, MD USA
关键词
RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; REMOTELY-SENSED DATA; LAND-SURFACE; MULTIOBJECTIVE CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; WATER-FLOW; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1175/JHM-D-15-0153.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) control infiltration and redistribution of moisture in a soil column. The Noah land surface model (LSM) default simulation selects SHPs according to a location's mapped soil texture class. SHPs are instead estimated at seven sites in North America through calibration. A single-objective algorithm minimizes the root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between simulated surface soil moisture and observations from 1) a dense network of in situ probes, 2) Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite retrievals, and 3) SMOS retrievals adjusted such that their mean equals that of the in situ network. Parameters are optimized in 2012 and validated in 2013 against the in situ network. RMSD and unbiased RMSD (ubRMSD) assess resulting surface soil moisture behavior. At all sites, assigning SHP parameters from a different soil texture than the one that is mapped decreases the RMSD by an average of 0.029 cm(3) cm(-3). Similar improvements result from calibrating parameters using in situ network data (0.031 cm(3) cm(-3)). Calibrations using remotely sensed data show comparable success (0.029 cm(3) cm(-3)) if the SMOS product has no bias. Calibrated simulations are superior to texture-based simulations in their ability to decrease ubRMSD at times of year when the default simulation is worst. Changes to both RMSD and ubRMSD are small when the default simulation is already good. Most calibrated simulations have higher runoff ratios than do texture based simulations, a change that warrants further evaluation. Overall, parameter selection using SMOS data shows good potential where biases are low.
引用
收藏
页码:2275 / 2292
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Satellite surface soil moisture from SMOS and Aquarius: Assessment for applications in agricultural landscapes
    Champagne, Catherine
    Rowlandson, Tracy
    Berg, Aaron
    Burns, Travis
    L'Heureux, Jessika
    Tetlock, Erica
    Adams, Justin R.
    McNairn, Heather
    Toth, Brenda
    Itenfisu, Daniel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATION AND GEOINFORMATION, 2016, 45 : 143 - 154
  • [32] Melt in Antarctica derived from Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) observations at L band
    Leduc-Leballeur, Marion
    Picard, Ghislain
    Macelloni, Giovanni
    Mialon, Arnaud
    Kerr, Yann H.
    [J]. CRYOSPHERE, 2020, 14 (02): : 539 - 548
  • [33] Towards soil hydraulic parameter retrieval from Land Surface Models using near-surface soil moisture data
    Bandara, H. R. S.
    Walker, J. P.
    Ruediger, C.
    Pipunic, R.
    Dharssi, I.
    Gurney, R.
    [J]. 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (MODSIM2011), 2011, : 3342 - 3348
  • [34] Towards soil property retrieval from space: Proof of concept using in situ observations
    Bandara, Ranmalee
    Walker, Jeffrey P.
    Ruediger, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2014, 512 : 27 - 38
  • [35] Estimation of soil moisture and soil temperature over India using the Noah multi-parameterisation land surface model
    Noel M. Chawang
    Sai Krishna V. S. Sakuru
    Anoop Sampelli
    Srinivasulu Jella
    Kusuma G. Rao
    M. V. Ramana
    [J]. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2023, 9 : 1873 - 1889
  • [36] Estimation of soil moisture and soil temperature over India using the Noah multi-parameterisation land surface model
    Chawang, Noel M.
    Sakuru, Sai Krishna V. S.
    Sampelli, Anoop
    Jella, Srinivasulu
    Rao, Kusuma G.
    Ramana, M., V
    [J]. MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 9 (02) : 1873 - 1889
  • [37] ESTIMATING SURFACE SOIL MOISTURE FROM SATELLITE OBSERVATIONS USING MACHINE LEARNING TRAINED ON IN SITU MEASUREMENTS IN THE CONTINENTAL US
    Xu, Hongzhang
    Yuan, Qiangqiang
    Li, Tongwen
    Shen, Huanfeng
    Zhang, Liangpei
    [J]. 2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS 2019), 2019, : 6166 - 6169
  • [38] Year-round estimation of soil moisture content using temporally variable soil hydraulic parameters
    Sipek, Vaclav
    Tesar, Miroslav
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2017, 31 (06) : 1438 - 1452
  • [39] SMOS-derived soil moisture anomalies and drought indices: a comparative analysis using in situ measurements
    Scaini, Anna
    Sanchez, Nilda
    Vicente-Serrano, Sergio M.
    Martinez-Fernandez, Jose
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2015, 29 (03) : 373 - 383
  • [40] AN APPROACH FOR SURFACE SOIL MOISTURE RETRIEVAL USING MICROWAVE VEGETATION INDICES BASED ON SMOS DATA
    Cui, Qian
    Shi, Jiancheng
    Zhao, Tianjie
    Liu, Qang
    [J]. 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2013, : 2692 - 2695