Subgrid-scale turbulence in shock-boundary layer flows

被引:1
|
作者
Jammalamadaka, Avinash [1 ]
Jaberi, Farhad [2 ]
机构
[1] Exa Corp, Burlington, MA 01803 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Shock-boundary layer interactions; LES; Subgrid-scale turbulence; High-speed turbulent flows; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; DIRECT NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; APPROXIMATE DECONVOLUTION MODEL; A-PRIORI TESTS; COMPRESSIBLE FLOWS; DIFFERENCE-SCHEMES; REYNOLDS-NUMBER; SEPARATION; RAMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00162-015-0339-8
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Data generated by direct numerical simulation (DNS) for a Mach 2.75 zero-pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer interacting with shocks of different intensities are used for a priori analysis of subgrid-scale (SGS) turbulence and various terms in the compressible filtered Navier-Stokes equations. The numerical method used for DNS is based on a hybrid scheme that uses a non-dissipative central scheme in the shock-free turbulent regions and a robust monotonicity-preserving scheme in the shock regions. The behavior of SGS stresses and their components, namely Leonard, Cross and Reynolds components, is examined in various regions of the flow for different shock intensities and filter widths. The backscatter in various regions of the flow is found to be significant only instantaneously, while the ensemble-averaged statistics indicate no significant backscatter. The budgets for the SGS kinetic energy equation are examined for a better understanding of shock-tubulence interactions at the subgrid level and also with the aim of providing useful information for one-equation LES models. A term-by-term analysis of SGS terms in the filtered total energy equation indicate that while each term in this equation is significant by itself, the net contribution by all of them is relatively small. This observation is consistent with our a posteriori analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 54
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Performance of subgrid-scale models in anisotropic turbulence
    Juneja, A
    Brasseur, JG
    Wyngaard, JC
    [J]. 12TH SYMPOSIUM ON BOUNDARY LAYERS AND TURBULENCE, 1997, : 233 - 234
  • [22] SUBGRID-SCALE MODELING OF COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENT FLOWS
    YOSHIZAWA, A
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1991, 3 (04): : 714 - 716
  • [23] An algebraic subgrid-scale RNG turbulence model for smooth free-surface flows
    Simoes, FJM
    [J]. FLOW MODELING AND TURBULENCE MEASURMENTS VI, 1996, : 687 - 694
  • [24] Subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of transition and turbulence in compressible flows
    Zhou, Hao
    Li, Xinliang
    Qi, Han
    Yu, Changping
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2019, 31 (12)
  • [25] Subgrid-scale modeling for turbulent reacting flows
    Cook, AW
    Riley, JJ
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1998, 112 (04) : 593 - 606
  • [26] SUBGRID-SCALE BACKSCATTER IN TURBULENT AND TRANSITIONAL FLOWS
    PIOMELLI, U
    CABOT, WH
    MOIN, P
    LEE, SS
    [J]. PHYSICS OF FLUIDS A-FLUID DYNAMICS, 1991, 3 (07): : 1766 - 1771
  • [27] Porous Bleed Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flows With & Without Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction
    Giehler, Julian
    Grenson, Pierre
    Bur, Reynald
    [J]. FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2023, 111 (04) : 1139 - 1173
  • [28] Multifractal scale-similarity in subgrid-scale turbulence modeling
    Burton, GC
    Dahm, WJA
    Dowling, DR
    Powell, KG
    [J]. ADVANCES IN TURBULENCE VIII, 2000, : 523 - 526
  • [29] Porous Bleed Boundary Conditions for Supersonic Flows With & Without Shock-Boundary Layer Interaction
    Julian Giehler
    Pierre Grenson
    Reynald Bur
    [J]. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2023, 111 : 1139 - 1173
  • [30] A subgrid-scale deconvolution approach for shock capturing
    Adams, NA
    Stolz, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2002, 178 (02) : 391 - 426