Racial differences in estrogen receptor staining levels and implications for treatment and survival among estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative invasive breast cancers

被引:13
|
作者
Purrington, Kristen S. [1 ,3 ]
Gorski, David [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Simon, Michael S. [1 ,3 ]
Hastert, Theresa A. [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Seongho [1 ,3 ]
Rosati, Rayna [1 ,4 ]
Schwartz, Ann G. [1 ,3 ]
Ratnam, Manohar [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Dept Oncol, 4100 John R, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Sch Med, Michael & Marian Ilitch Dept Surg, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Populat Studies & Dispar Res Program, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[4] Barbara Ann Karmanos Canc Inst, Mol Therapeut Program, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
Gene expression; Pathology; Clinical outcomes; Racial disparities; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; GENE-EXPRESSION; RECURRENCE; WOMEN; ASSAY; VALIDATION; TAMOXIFEN; BENEFIT; RISK; RACE;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-020-05607-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background African American women (AAW) die more frequently from estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer than European American women (EAW). We investigated the relationship between race, percent ER staining, treatment, and clinical outcomes. Methods Percent ER staining (weakly ER+: 1-10%, moderately ER+: 11-50%, strongly ER+: > 50%) was abstracted from pathology reports for 1573 women with ER+/HER2- invasive breast cancer treated at a single cancer center in Detroit, MI from 2010 to 2017. Clinical outcomes and tumor characteristics were obtained from the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System. Associations of ER levels with demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated using logistic regression. Overall and breast cancer-specific (BCS) survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results AAW were more likely to have tumors with lower ER staining levels than EAW (weakly ER+: Odds ratio (OR) 2.19, p = 0.019; moderately ER+: OR 2.80, p = 0.005). Women with weakly compared to strongly ER+ tumors were less likely to receive endocrine therapy (ET) regardless of race (OR 0.79, p < 0.001). Mortality was predicted by both AA race (Overall hazard ratio (HR) = 1.72, p < 0.001; BCS HR 1.45, p = 0.08) and low (1-50%) ER (Overall HR 1.57, p = 0.083; BCS HR 2.11, p = 0.017) adjusting for clinic-pathologic characteristics. ET was associated with improved BCS survival in all women (1-50%: HR 0.11, p < 0.001; > 50%: HR 0.24, p < 0.001). Conclusion The biology of ER+/HER2- tumors varies by race, although this does not appear to account for racial differences in survival. Although ET substantially reduces mortality among women with weakly ER+ tumors, these women are less likely to be treated with ET and have poorer outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Revisiting the definition of estrogen receptor positivity in HER2-negative primary breast cancer
    Fujii, T.
    Kogawa, T.
    Dong, W.
    Sahin, A. A.
    Moulder, S.
    Litton, J. K.
    Tripathy, D.
    Iwamoto, T.
    Hunt, K. K.
    Pusztai, L.
    Lim, B.
    Shen, Y.
    Ueno, N. T.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (10) : 2420 - 2428
  • [32] FDA Approval: Palbociclib for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Patients with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Beaver, Julia A.
    Amiri-Kordestani, Laleh
    Charlab, Rosane
    Chen, Wei
    Palmby, Todd
    Tilley, Amy
    Zirkelbach, Jeanne Fourie
    Yu, Jingyu
    Liu, Qi
    Zhao, Liang
    Crich, Joyce
    Chen, Xiao Hong
    Hughes, Minerva
    Bloomquist, Erik
    Tang, Shenghui
    Sridhara, Rajeshwari
    Kluetz, Paul G.
    Kim, Geoffrey
    Ibrahim, Amna
    Pazdur, Richard
    Cortazar, Patricia
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 21 (21) : 4760 - 4766
  • [33] Ongoing unmet needs in treating estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer
    Basaran, Gul A.
    Twelves, Chris
    Dieras, Veronique
    Cortes, Javier
    Awada, Ahmad
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 63 : 144 - 155
  • [34] Pathological Prognostic Factors in Estrogen Receptor Positive/Her2 Negative and Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancers
    Mendoza, Pia
    Sonmez, Ceyda
    Zhang, Chao
    Neely, Cameron
    Liu, Yuan
    Li, Xiaoxian
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 59A - 59A
  • [35] Pathological Prognostic Factors in Estrogen Receptor Positive/Her2 Negative and Lymph Node Negative Breast Cancers
    Mendoza, Pia
    Sonmez, Ceyda
    Zhang, Chao
    Neely, Cameron
    Liu, Yuan
    Li, Xiaoxian
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 59A - 59A
  • [36] Effects of lumpectomy or mastectomy on plasma epoxyeicosatrienoic acid levels in patients with estrogen receptor positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Guo, Zhijun
    Chu, Haitao
    Berger, Adam C.
    Tuttle, Todd M.
    Zera, Richard
    Guttormson, Nancy
    Nowak, Deborah
    Bowers, Barbara Jean
    Kerr, Elizabeth
    Boulanger, Kate
    Mordenti, Melisa
    Miller, Jeffrey S.
    Yee, Douglas
    Potter, David
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (15)
  • [37] Triple positive (androgen receptor plus , estrogen receptor+ and HER2+) breast cancers
    Orsaria, M.
    Khelifa, S.
    Tavassoli, F.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2011, 459 : S78 - S78
  • [38] GATA3 Is a Marker of Estrogen Receptor-Positive but Not Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancers
    Piscuoglio, S.
    Wen, Y. H.
    Martelotto, L. G.
    Rocco, E. Guerini
    Akram, M.
    Jungbluth, A. A.
    Brogi, E.
    Weigelt, B.
    Reis-Filho, J. S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2014, 94 : 76A - 76A
  • [39] GATA3 Is a Marker of Estrogen Receptor-Positive but Not Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancers
    Piscuoglio, S.
    Wen, Y. H.
    Martelotto, L. G.
    Rocco, E. Guerini
    Akram, M.
    Jungbluth, A. A.
    Brogi, E.
    Weigelt, B.
    Reis-Filho, J. S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 27 : 76A - 76A
  • [40] Association of mammography and ultrasound features with MammaPrint in patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive invasive breast cancer
    Choi, Woo Jung
    Sim, Hayan
    Kim, Hee Jeong
    Cha, Joo Hee
    Shin, Hee Jung
    Chae, Eun Young
    Kim, Hak Hee
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (12) : 1592 - 1600