Distinct core thalamocortical pathways to central and dorsal primary auditory cortex

被引:11
|
作者
Read, Heather L. [1 ]
Nauen, David W. [1 ]
Escabi, Monty A. [1 ]
Miller, Lee M. [1 ]
Schreiner, Christoph E. [1 ]
Winer, Jeffery A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, WM Keck Ctr Integrat Neurosci, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mol & Cell Biol, Div Neurobiol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
MEDIAL GENICULATE-BODY; SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL; RESPONSE PROPERTIES; FUNCTIONAL-ORGANIZATION; TONOTOPIC ORGANIZATION; MODULAR ORGANIZATION; SPECTRAL INTEGRATION; BALANCED INHIBITION; VENTRAL DIVISION; SINGLE UNITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2010.11.010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The cat primary auditory cortex (AI) is usually assumed to form one continuous functional region. However, the dorsal and central parts of the AI iso-frequency domain contain neurons that have distinct response properties to acoustic stimuli. In this study, we asked whether neurons projecting to dorsal versus central regions of AI originate in different parts of the medial geniculate body (MGB). Spike rate responses to variations in the sound level and frequency of pure tones were used to measure characteristic frequency (CF) and frequency resolution. These were mapped with high spatial density in order to place retrograde tracers into matching frequency regions of the central narrow-band region (cNB) and dorsal AI. Labeled neurons projecting to these two parts of AI were concentrated in the middle and rostral thirds of the MGB, respectively. There was little evidence that differences in dorsal and central AI function could be due to convergent input from cells outside the ventral division of the MGB (MGBv). Instead, inputs arising from different locations along the caudal-to-rostral dimension of MGBv represent potential sources of response differences between central and dorsal sub-regions of AI. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 104
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is song processing distinct and special in the auditory cortex?
    Harris, Ilana
    Niven, Efe C.
    Griffin, Alex
    Scott, Sophie K.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 24 (11) : 711 - 722
  • [32] Is song processing distinct and special in the auditory cortex?
    Ilana Harris
    Efe C. Niven
    Alex Griffin
    Sophie K. Scott
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2023, 24 : 711 - 722
  • [33] Intracortical pathways determine breadth of subthreshold frequency receptive fields in primary auditory cortex
    Kaur, S
    Lazar, R
    Metherate, R
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 91 (06) : 2551 - 2567
  • [34] Thalamic Label Patterns Suggest Primary and Ventral Auditory Fields Are Distinct Core Regions
    Storace, Douglas A.
    Higgins, Nathan C.
    Read, Heather L.
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 2010, 518 (10) : 1630 - 1646
  • [35] Crossmodal Induction of Thalamocortical Potentiation Leads to Enhanced Information Processing in the Auditory Cortex
    Petrus, Emily
    Isaiah, Amal
    Jones, Adam P.
    Li, David
    Wang, Hui
    Lee, Hey-Kyoung
    Kanold, Patrick O.
    NEURON, 2014, 81 (03) : 664 - 673
  • [36] SEGREGATED THALAMOCORTICAL PATHWAYS TO INFERIOR PARIETAL AND INFEROTEMPORAL CORTEX IN MACAQUE MONKEY
    BALEYDIER, C
    MOREL, A
    VISUAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 8 (05) : 391 - 405
  • [37] SINGLE THALAMOCORTICAL AXONS DIVERGE TO MULTIPLE PATCHES IN NEONATAL AUDITORY-CORTEX
    DEVENECIA, RK
    MCMULLEN, NT
    DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1994, 81 (01): : 135 - 142
  • [38] Neural correlates of an auditory afterimage in primary auditory cortex
    Noreña, AJ
    Eggermont, JJ
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 4 (03): : 312 - 328
  • [39] Nicotinic neuromodulation in auditory cortex requires MAPK activation in thalamocortical and intracortical circuits
    Intskirveli, Irakli
    Metherate, Raju
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 107 (10) : 2782 - 2793
  • [40] Modulation of thalamic auditory neurons by the primary auditory cortex
    Tang, Jie
    Yang, Weiguo
    Suga, Nobuo
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 108 (03) : 935 - 942