Evidence-based indications for thrombophilia screening

被引:50
|
作者
Lindhoff-Last, E. [1 ]
Luxembourg, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Div Vasc Med Haemostaseol, Dept Internal Med, Frankfurt, Germany
来源
VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES | 2008年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
thrombophilia; factor V Leiden mutation; prothrombin mutation; hyperhomocysteinemia; MTHFR-mutation; antiphospholipid antibodies; pregnancy; obstetric complications; fetal loss; venous thrombosis; arterial thrombosis;
D O I
10.1024/0301-1526.37.1.19
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Thrombophilic defects have been shown to be associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, fetal loss, and gestational complications. The knowledge about the clinical relevance of thrombophilic defects is increasing, and evidence-based indications for thrombophilia screening are therefore discussed in this review. Selective thrombophilia screening based on previous personal and/or family history of venous thromboembolism is more cost-effective than universal screening in all patient groups evaluated. In the majority of patients with acute venous thrombosis, the results of thrombophilia screening do not influence the duration of oral anticoagulation. The only patient population who clearly profits from thrombophilia screening in this situation are patients with a newly diagnosed antiphospholipid syndrome, because prolonged anticoagulation can avoid the high incidence of recurrence in this patient population. Because of the increased risk of venous thrombosis during pregnancy and the puerperium, thrombophilia screening is indicated in selected patients with a previous history of venous thrombosis or a positive family history. Significant associations with early and late pregnancy loss are observed for carriers of the heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation, the heterozygous prothrombin-mutation G20210A and anticardiolipin antibodies, while protein S deficiency is significantly associated with late pregnancy loss. Antithrombotic drugs like UFH, LMWH or low-dose aspirin may have a potential therapeutic benefit in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and thrombophilia, but placebo-controlled, multicenter trials are urgently needed to clarify this issue. Although a supra-additive effect for the risk of venous thrombosis is observed between oral contraceptives and some thrombophilias, the absolute incidence of venous thromboembolism is low in premenopausal women and mass screening strategies are therefore unlikely to be effective. While antiphospholipid antibodies are known to be associated with arterial thrombosis, screening for heritable thrombophilias is not useful in arterial thrombosis, although subgroup analysis indicates that they may play a role particularly in young patients and children.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 30
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evidence-based indications of platelet-rich plasma therapy
    Gupta, Shyla
    Paliczak, Anna
    Delgado, Diego
    EXPERT REVIEW OF HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 14 (01) : 97 - 108
  • [32] Evidence-Based Indications in Hypertensive PatientsHelping Doctors in the Initial Choice
    Massimo Volpe
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 2004, 11 (1) : 1 - 7
  • [33] Acute pancreatitis:: Evidence-based indications for surgery -: The current concept
    Schaefer, M.
    Heinrich, S.
    Clavien, P. -A.
    PANCREATITIS: ADVANCES IN PATHOBIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT, 2005, 143 : 89 - 100
  • [34] Botulinum toxin: evidence-based medicine criteria in rare indications
    Jost, WH
    Kohl, A
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2001, 248 : S39 - S44
  • [35] Botulinum toxin: evidence-based medicine criteria in rare indications
    Wolfgang H. Jost
    André Kohl
    Journal of Neurology, 2001, 248 (Suppl 1) : I39 - I44
  • [36] Arthroscopic treatment of osteoarthrifis of the knee - Are there any evidence-based indications?
    Siparsky, Patrick
    Ryzewicz, Mark
    Peterson, Bret
    Bartz, Reed
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (455) : 107 - 112
  • [37] Beta-blockers in cirrhosis: Evidence-based indications and limitations
    Rodrigues, Susana G.
    Mendoza, Yuly P.
    Bosch, Jaime
    JHEP REPORTS, 2020, 2 (01)
  • [38] Screening for cervical cancer - an evidence-based approach
    Fraser, A
    Hellmann, S
    Leibovici, L
    Levavi, H
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 26 (04) : 372 - 375
  • [39] Breast Cancer Screening An Evidence-Based Update
    Fuller, Mackenzie S.
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 99 (03) : 451 - +
  • [40] Screening, case finding and evidence-based guidelines
    McNeil, JJ
    O'Brien, PE
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1999, 171 (07) : 344 - 345