Tourism and Development Aid and the Socio-Economic Development Level of Geographically Disadvantaged and Least Developed Countries

被引:2
|
作者
Jasinski, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Warsaw Sch Econ, Katedra Unii Europejskiej J Monneta, Al Niepodleglosci 162, PL-02554 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
development aid; international tourism; the South;
D O I
10.24917/20801653.333.9
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The aim of the article is to analyse the significance of the tourist product export and development aid, as well as the level of socio-economic development in 83 countries of the Global South. These countries have been grouped due to geographical features that significantly inhibit socio-economic development: 1) small island developing states, and 2) land-locked developing countries. These countries have been identified for the purposes of the article as countries with geographical disadvantage. In addition, a group of the least developed countries was distinguished. The significance of the tourist product export was measured by the tourism export index (WEPTG) constructed for the needs of the study. The degree of importance of development assistance (aid) was measured by the development aid in the economy (WPRG). The level of socio-economic level was assessed with the use of Human Development Index (HDI) and Gross National Income (GNI) per capita. The analysis shows that economies with high WEPTG were on the highest economic development level. Further analysis assets that "tourism monoculture" is significant only in small island developing states but "aid monoculture" occurs in some small states and in countries with bigger development opportunities. The research results shows that tourism specialisation in most of the analysed countries have positive aspects.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 147
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DEVELOPMENT AID FROM VOLUNTARY AGENCIES TO THE LEAST DEVELOPED-COUNTRIES
    BETTS, TF
    [J]. AFRICA TODAY, 1978, 25 (04) : 49 - 68
  • [22] ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE MARGINS OF TRADE: ARE THE LEAST DEVELOPED COUNTRIES DIFFERENT?
    Mora, Jesse
    Olabisi, Michael
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2021, 59 (02) : 600 - 621
  • [23] THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LEVEL OF THE ROMANIAN RURAL SPACE
    Chitea, Lorena
    Dona, Ion
    Chitea, Mihai
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES MANAGEMENT ECONOMIC ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 18 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [24] Tourist Flows and the Level of Socio-Economic Development of Mauritius
    Wojtowicz, Bozena
    [J]. PRACE KOMISJI GEOGRAFII PRZEMYSLU POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA GEOGRAFICZNEGO-STUDIES OF THE INDUSTRIAL GEOGRAPHY COMMISSION OF THE POLISH GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 33 (03): : 100 - 111
  • [25] ON THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC CLIMATE IN DEVELOPED CAPITALIST COUNTRIES
    KOCIANOVA, H
    [J]. POLITICKA EKONOMIE, 1989, 37 (06) : 729 - 742
  • [26] Socio-economic development of countries based on the Composite Country Development Index (CCDI)
    Nuralina, Kalamkas
    Baizholova, Raissa
    Aleksandrova, Natalya
    Konstantinov, Viktor
    Biryukov, Alexander
    [J]. REGIONAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 4 (02) : 115 - 128
  • [27] Less Developed Countries, Tourism Investments and Local Economic Development
    Andergassen, Rainer
    Candela, Guido
    [J]. REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 17 (01) : 16 - 33
  • [28] Socio-economic development of countries based on the Composite Country Development Index(CCDI)
    Kalamkas NURALINA
    Raissa BAIZHOLOVA
    Natalya ALEKSANDROVA
    Viktor KONSTANTINOV
    Alexander BIRYUKOV
    [J]. Regional Sustainability, 2023, 4 (02) : 115 - 128
  • [29] A multivariate approach in measuring socio-economic development of MENA countries
    Milenkovic, Nemanja
    Vukmirovic, Jovanka
    Bulajic, Milica
    Radojicic, Zoran
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 38 : 604 - 608
  • [30] High-Tech Industry And The Socio-Economic Development of The Countries
    Gurbala, Maciej
    [J]. PRACE KOMISJI GEOGRAFII PRZEMYSLU POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA GEOGRAFICZNEGO-STUDIES OF THE INDUSTRIAL GEOGRAPHY COMMISSION OF THE POLISH GEOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 16 : 187 - 200