A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial on the use of mifepristone with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical abortions of less than 9 weeks gestation

被引:78
|
作者
Tang, OS [1 ]
Chan, CCW [1 ]
Ng, EHY [1 ]
Lee, SWH [1 ]
Ho, PC [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
medical abortion; misoprostol; sublingual; vaginal;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/deg475
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: A combination of mifepristone and misoprostol provides an effective method of medical abortion for early pregnancy. This is the first randomized trial comparing the use of sublingual misoprostol with vaginal misoprostol in combination with mifepristone for termination of early pregnancies up to 63 days. Methods: A total of 224 women who requested legal termination of pregnancy up to 63 days were randomized by computer- generated list into two groups and given 200 mg of oral mifepristone followed 48 h later by either 800 mug of sublingual (n=112) or vaginal (n=112) misoprostol. Results: Complete abortion occurred in 98.2% (95% CI: 93-99) of women in the sublingual group and 93.8% (95% CI: 88-97) in the vaginal group. There were three ongoing pregnancies in the vaginal group but none in the sublingual group. The median duration of vaginal bleeding was 17 days. There was no serious complication. Fever, chills and gastrointestinal side-effects (nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea) were significantly more common in the sublingual group. Conclusions: The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is effective for medical abortion up to 63 days. Both the sublingual and vaginal are effective routes of administration. Further randomized trials are required to find out the optimal dose of sublingual misoprostol that can give the highest complete abortion rate and lowest incidence of side-effects.
引用
收藏
页码:2315 / 2318
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mifepristone and sublingual misoprostol versus sublingual misoprostol alone for missed abortion: Results of a randomized placebo-controlled trial
    Bracken, H.
    Zuberi, N.
    de Guevara Puerto, A. L.
    Mayi-Tsonga, S.
    Buendia Gomez, M.
    Ahmed, Irfan S.
    Minkobame, U.
    Perrin, R. X.
    Diop, A.
    Abbas, D.
    Pena, M.
    Winikoff, B.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 99 (05) : 315 - 316
  • [2] A prospective randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial comparing mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol to vaginal misoprostol alone for elective termination of early pregnancy
    Jain, JK
    Dutton, C
    Harwood, B
    Meckstroth, KR
    Mishell, DR
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (06) : 1477 - 1482
  • [3] Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: A randomized prospective placebo-controlled study
    Zahran, Kamal M.
    Shahin, Ahmed Y.
    Abdellah, Mohamad S.
    Elsayh, Khalid I.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (06) : 1054 - 1060
  • [4] Mifepristone plus vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol alone for medical abortion in gestation 63 days or less in Nepalese women: A quasi-randomized controlled trial
    Chawdhary, Rashmi
    Rana, Ashma
    Pradhan, Neelam
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (01) : 78 - 85
  • [5] A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and oral misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortion at 12-20 weeks gestation
    Tang, OS
    Chan, CCW
    Kan, ASY
    Ho, PC
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (11) : 3062 - 3066
  • [6] Two prophylactic pain management regimens for medical abortion ≤63 days' gestation with mifepristone and misoprostol: A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Dragoman, Monica V.
    Grossman, Daniel
    Nguyen, My Huong
    Habib, Ndema
    Kapp, Nathalie
    Tamang, Anand
    Bessenaar, Tshego
    Lan Dung Duong
    Gautam, Jageshwor
    Yoko, Jean-Louis
    Minh Hong
    Gulmezoglu, Metin
    CONTRACEPTION, 2021, 103 (03) : 163 - 170
  • [7] Mifepristone and Oral, Vaginal, or Sublingual Misoprostol for Second-Trimester Abortion A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dickinson, Jan E.
    Jennings, Belinda G.
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (06): : 1162 - 1168
  • [8] A prospective randomized comparison of sublingual and oral misoprostol when combined with mifepristone for medical abortion at 12-20 weeks gestation.
    Tang, O
    Chan, C
    Kan, A
    Ho, P
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S168 - S168
  • [9] Pilot study on the use of sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone in termination of first trimester pregnancy up to 9 weeks gestation
    Tang, OS
    Xu, JS
    Cheng, LN
    Lee, SWH
    Ho, PC
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2002, 17 (07) : 1738 - 1740
  • [10] Sublingual versus Vaginal Misoprostol for the Induction of Labor at Term: A Randomized, Triple-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Jahromi, Bahia Namavar
    Poorgholam, Foroogh
    Yousefi, Gholamhossein
    Salarian, Leila
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 41 (02) : 79 - 85