The meaning of agricultural sustainability: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey

被引:51
|
作者
Sydorovych, Olha [1 ]
Wossink, Ada [2 ]
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
conjoint analysis; choice experiments; sustainability assessment; stakeholders;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2008.03.001
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Because of its complex, multi-dimensional nature, agricultural sustainability is most often assessed using numerous indicators, which make aggregate comparisons among different production systems difficult. In this paper we propose a methodology that could be beneficial in aggregate sustainability assessment. We apply the method of conjoint analysis to select economic, social, and ecological attributes that are perceived as important for agricultural sustainability by different stakeholders and to assess their relative impact on the overall sustainability measure. Our method presents a flexible framework which could be adopted for a variety of specific applications and allows drawing comparisons among various stakeholder groups based on how they perceive agricultural sustainability. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 20
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using expert judgment to assess adaptive capacity to climate change: Evidence from a conjoint choice survey
    Alberini, Anna
    Chiabai, Aline
    Muehlenbachs, Lucija
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (02): : 123 - 144
  • [2] Political trust and climate policy choice: evidence from a conjoint experiment
    Devine, Daniel
    Stoker, Gerry
    Jennings, Will
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2024, 44 (02) : 327 - 343
  • [3] Bureaucracy and policymaking: Evidence from a choice-based conjoint analysis
    Batista, Mariana
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2023, 10 (03)
  • [4] Sustainability and customers' hotel choice behaviour: a choice-based conjoint analysis approach
    Verma, Vivek Kumar
    Chandra, Bibhas
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 20 (03) : 1347 - 1363
  • [5] The Number of Choice Tasks and Survey Satisficing in Conjoint Experiments
    Bansak, Kirk
    Hainmueller, Jens
    Hopkins, Daniel J.
    Yamamoto, Teppei
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 26 (01) : 112 - 119
  • [6] Sustainability and customers’ hotel choice behaviour: a choice-based conjoint analysis approach
    Vivek Kumar Verma
    Bibhas Chandra
    [J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20 : 1347 - 1363
  • [7] Candidate Choice Without Party Labels:New Insights from Conjoint Survey Experiments
    Patricia A. Kirkland
    Alexander Coppock
    [J]. Political Behavior, 2018, 40 : 571 - 591
  • [8] Candidate Choice Without Party Labels: New Insights from Conjoint Survey Experiments
    Kirkland, Patricia A.
    Coppock, Alexander
    [J]. POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2018, 40 (03) : 571 - 591
  • [9] Hospital Choice: Survey Evidence from Istanbul
    Adaman, Fikret
    Ardic, Oya Pinar
    Erus, Burcay
    Tuzemen, Didem
    [J]. TURKISH STUDIES, 2009, 10 (03) : 443 - 468
  • [10] Using Choice-Format Conjoint Analysis to Assign Meaning to PRO Scores
    Coon, Cheryl D.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Mohamed, Ateesha F.
    McLeod, Lori D.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 126 - 127