Using Choice-Format Conjoint Analysis to Assign Meaning to PRO Scores

被引：0
|
作者：
Coon, Cheryl D. [1 ]
Hauber, A. Brett [2 ]
Mohamed, Ateesha F. [2 ]
McLeod, Lori D. [1 ]
机构：
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Patient Reported Outcomes, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
[2] RTI Hlth Solut, Hlth Preference Assessment, Res Triangle Pk, NC USA
来源：
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH | 2010年 / 19卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R19 [保健组织与事业（卫生事业管理）];
学科分类号：
摘要：
258/1468
引用
收藏
页码：126 / 127
页数：2
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Eliciting Benefit-Risk Preferences and Probability-Weighted Utility Using Choice-Format Conjoint Analysis
    Van Houtven, George
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Kilambi, Vikram
    Hauber, A. Brett
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 31 (03) : 469 - 480
  • [2] IN DEFENSE OF IMPERFECT EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS: STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY AND MEASUREMENT ERROR IN CHOICE-FORMAT CONJOINT ANALYSIS
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Yang, Jui-Chen
    Mohamed, Ateesha F.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAWTOOTH SOFTWARE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, : 195 - 205
  • [3] Psoriasis patient preferences for health-related benefit-risk tradeoffs using choice-format conjoint analysis
    Armstrong, A. W.
    Wu, J.
    Brezinski, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2014, 134 : S54 - S54
  • [4] DOCTOR KNOWS BEST: THE EFFECT OF YEA-SAYING BIAS ON WILLINGNESS TO PAY IN CHOICE-FORMAT CONJOINT-ANALYSIS STUDIES
    Marshall, D.
    Johnson, F. R.
    Ozdemir, S.
    Kulin, N. A.
    Kilambi, V
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A70 - A70
  • [5] Measuring patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening using a choice-format survey
    Marshall, Deborah A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Phillips, Kathryn A.
    Marshall, John K.
    Thabane, Lehana
    Kulin, Nathalie A.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2007, 10 (05) : 415 - 430
  • [6] Trade-offs between toxicity and progression-free survival in renal cell carcinoma therapies: a choice-format conjoint study of patient preferences
    Wong, M. K.
    Mohamed, A. F.
    Yang, J. C.
    Hauber, A. B.
    Liu, Z.
    Rogerio, J.
    Garay, C. A.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 109 : 13 - 13
  • [7] CONCORDANCE OF PREFERENCES AND TREATMENT CHOICE USING CHOICE BASED ADAPTIVE CONJOINT ANALYSIS
    Jayadevappa, R.
    Chhatre, S.
    Malkowicz, S. B.
    Schwartz, J. S.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2021, 24 : S196 - S196
  • [8] GAME THEORY AND CONJOINT ANALYSIS: USING CHOICE DATA FOR STRATEGIC DECISIONS
    Chapman, Christopher N.
    Love, Edwin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SAWTOOTH SOFTWARE CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, : 1 - +
  • [9] Using Conjoint Analysis and Choice Experiments to Estimate QALY ValuesIssues to Consider
    Terry N. Flynn
    [J]. PharmacoEconomics, 2010, 28 : 711 - 722
  • [10] Measurement of headlight form preference using choice based conjoint analysis
    Swamy, Surya
    Orsborn, Seth
    Michalek, Jeremy
    Cagan, Jonathan
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE 2007, VOL 6, PTS A AND B, 2008, : 197 - 206
12345