The communication of forensic science in the criminal justice system: A review of theory and proposed directions for research

被引:23
|
作者
Howes, Loene M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, TILES, Sch Social Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Sch Med, Psychol, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
Forensic science; Expert opinion; Science communication; Deficit model; Communication; Literature review; REPORT-USERS REPORTS; EXPERT REPORTS; ADMISSIBILITY; MEDICINE; DNA; READABILITY; SCIENTISTS; TESTIMONY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scijus.2014.11.002
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Clear communication about forensic science is essential to the effectiveness and perceived trustworthiness of the criminal justice system. Communication can be seen as a meaning-making process that involves different components such as the sender of a message, the message itself, the channel in which a message is sent, and the receiver of the message. Research conducted to date on the communication between forensic scientists and non-scientists in the criminal justice system has focused on different components of the communication process as objects of study. The purpose of this paper is to bring together communication theory and past research on the communication of forensic science to contribute to a deeper understanding of it, and to provide a coherent view of it overall. The paper first outlines the broader context of communication theory and science communication as a backdrop to forensic science communication. Then it presents a conceptual framework as a way to organise past research and, using the framework, reviews recent examples of empirical research and commentary on the communication of forensic science. Finally the paper identifies aspects of the communication of forensic science that may be addressed by future research to enhance the effectiveness of communication between scientists and non-scientists in this multidisciplinary arena. (C) 2014 Forensic Science Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The interface between forensic science and technology: how technology could cause a paradigm shift in the role of forensic institutes in the criminal justice system
    Kloosterman, Ate
    Mapes, Anna
    Geradts, Zeno
    van Eijk, Erwin
    Koper, Carola
    van den Berg, Jorrit
    Verheij, Saskia
    van der Steen, Marcel
    van Asten, Arian
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1674)
  • [22] Ethical challenges to research in the criminal justice system
    Brown, Penelope
    CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2018, 28 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [23] Public Opinion and Criminal Justice Policy: Theory and Research
    Pickett, Justin T.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRIMINOLOGY, VOL 2, 2019, 2 : 405 - 428
  • [25] Factors leading to the involvement of Forensic Advisors in the Belgian criminal justice system
    Bitzer, Sonja
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 285 : 181 - 188
  • [27] Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany
    Konrad, Norbert
    Voellm, Birgit
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 37 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [29] Immanent Justice Reasoning: Theory, Research, and Current Directions
    Callan, Mitchell J.
    Sutton, Robbie M.
    Harvey, Annelie J.
    Dawtry, Rael J.
    ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 49, 2014, 49 : 105 - 161
  • [30] ROLE OF SOCIAL-SCIENCE RESEARCH IN CRIMINAL-JUSTICE
    MCGRATH, WT
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE CRIMINOLOGIE, 1976, 18 (04): : R1 - R4