Physicians' preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:35
|
作者
Benjamin, Laure [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotte, Francois-Emery [1 ]
Philippe, Caroline [4 ]
Mercier, Florence [5 ]
Bachelot, Thomas [6 ]
Vidal-Trecan, Gwenaelle [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Hlth Outcomes Studies, F-78163 Marly Le Roi, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Epidemiol Evaluat & Polit Sante EA4069, F-75181 Paris 04, France
[3] EHESP, F-35043 Rennes, France
[4] Qualees, F-75009 Paris, France
[5] Stat Proc, F-27940 Port Mort, France
[6] Ctr Leon Berard, INSERM, U950, F-69373 Lyon 08, France
[7] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Grp Hosp Paris Ctr, Unite Sante Publ Gest Risques & Qualite, F-75014 Paris, France
[8] Univ Paris 05, Fac Med, F-75270 Paris 06, France
关键词
Discrete Choice Experiment; Conjoint analysis; Preference; Medical decision-making; Anticancer drugs; Oral chemotherapy; Intravenous chemotherapy; Chemotherapy administration; Reimbursement; HEALTH-CARE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although efficacy and tolerability are classical criteria for treatment choice, patient adherence and tariff issues related to novel oral anticancer drugs may also influence therapeutic decisions. We estimated the relative influence of efficacy, tolerability, expected adherence and route of administration of a chemotherapy treatment on 203 French physicians' preferences who participated in a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), a quantitative method used to elicit preferences. From a questionnaire with six scenarii, respondents had to choose between two treatments which differed with respect to these four attributes. Scenarii were first presented in a curative setting then in a palliative setting. Efficacy, tolerability and expected adherence had two modalities (good versus moderate) and route of administration had three modalities (intravenous ((sic)286-379/session), oral with the current tariff ((sic)28/consultation), oral with a hypothetical tariff ((sic)114)). Efficacy was the reference criterion in choosing a treatment whatever the therapeutic goal(beta:2.114, p < 0.0001 in curative setting versus beta: 1.063, p < 0.0001 in palliative setting). The oral route of administration was important but only in a palliative setting (beta: 0.612, p = 0.035, and beta: 0.506, p < 0.0001 for the current and hypothetical tariff, respectively). Removing the efficacy attribute from logistic regression model, tolerability (beta: 1.228, p = 0.0001) and expected adherence (beta: 1.223, p = 0.0001) were influent in curative setting while the route of administration was still predominant in palliative setting (beta: 0.431, p < 0.0001). Results suggest that economic considerations as well as therapeutic efficacy play a significant role in choosing a treatment. Preference for oral chemotherapy with a hypothetical tariff for a patient support programme should be considered for the development of therapeutic education and healthcare coordination, currently not taken into account in the tariff of oral chemotherapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biologics and oral systemic treatment preferences in patients and physicians for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a discrete choice experiment in the United Kingdom and Germany
    Durno, Nicholas
    Arija, Pablo
    Pantiri, Krystallia
    Heisen, Marieke
    Boeri, Marco
    Paris, Josef
    Jack, Katrin
    Chambenoit, Olivier
    Subramanian, Ramkumar
    Puelles, Jorge
    Stolk, Elly
    van Hout, Ben
    Silverberg, Jonathan I.
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2024, 35 (01)
  • [42] Neurotization Preferences in Smile Reanimation: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Dusseldorp, Joseph R.
    Naunheim, Matthew R.
    Quatela, Olivia
    Fortier, Emily
    Hadlock, Tessa A.
    Jowett, Nate
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (03) : 407E - 415E
  • [43] Patient Preferences for Managing Insomnia: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Cheung, Janet M. Y.
    Bartlett, Delwyn J.
    Armour, Carol L.
    Saini, Bandana
    Laba, Tracey-Lea
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2018, 11 (05): : 503 - 514
  • [44] Patients' Preferences in Anticoagulant Therapy Discrete Choice Experiment
    Najafzadeh, Mehdi
    Gagne, Joshua J.
    Choudhry, Niteesh K.
    Polinski, Jennifer M.
    Avorn, Jerry
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian S.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2014, 7 (06): : 912 - 919
  • [45] PATIENT PREFERENCES IN ADHD-DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Muehlbacher, A. C.
    Rudolph, I
    Lincke, H. J.
    Nuebling, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (06) : A594 - A594
  • [46] PATIENT PREFERENCES FOR GLIOBLASTOMA MULTIFORME: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    MacEwan, Joanna
    Doctor, Jason
    May, Suepattra
    Bonnet, Patrick
    Hou, Ningqi
    Tebeka, Mahlet
    Lakdawalla, Darius
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 157 - 157
  • [47] Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Christian Speckemeier
    Carina Abels
    Klemens Höfer
    Anja Niemann
    Jürgen Wasem
    Anke Walendzik
    Silke Neusser
    PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2024, 8 : 65 - 78
  • [48] Preferences of patients with depression for exercises: a discrete choice experiment
    Li, Hui-qin
    Xie, Peng
    Hou, Yu
    Jiang, Weixin
    Gong, Shiwei
    Jin, Si
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [49] Patient Preferences for Hemophilia a Treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Sun, Shawn X.
    Zhao, Jing
    Yang, Hongbo
    Wu, Eric
    BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [50] Girls' preferences for HPV vaccination: A discrete choice experiment
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hofman, Robine
    Donkers, Bas
    van Ballegooijen, Marjolein
    Helmerhorst, Theo J. M.
    Raat, Hein
    Korfage, Ida J.
    VACCINE, 2010, 28 (41) : 6692 - 6697