Physicians' preferences for prescribing oral and intravenous anticancer drugs: A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:35
|
作者
Benjamin, Laure [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cotte, Francois-Emery [1 ]
Philippe, Caroline [4 ]
Mercier, Florence [5 ]
Bachelot, Thomas [6 ]
Vidal-Trecan, Gwenaelle [2 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Hlth Outcomes Studies, F-78163 Marly Le Roi, France
[2] Univ Paris 05, Epidemiol Evaluat & Polit Sante EA4069, F-75181 Paris 04, France
[3] EHESP, F-35043 Rennes, France
[4] Qualees, F-75009 Paris, France
[5] Stat Proc, F-27940 Port Mort, France
[6] Ctr Leon Berard, INSERM, U950, F-69373 Lyon 08, France
[7] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Grp Hosp Paris Ctr, Unite Sante Publ Gest Risques & Qualite, F-75014 Paris, France
[8] Univ Paris 05, Fac Med, F-75270 Paris 06, France
关键词
Discrete Choice Experiment; Conjoint analysis; Preference; Medical decision-making; Anticancer drugs; Oral chemotherapy; Intravenous chemotherapy; Chemotherapy administration; Reimbursement; HEALTH-CARE; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2011.09.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although efficacy and tolerability are classical criteria for treatment choice, patient adherence and tariff issues related to novel oral anticancer drugs may also influence therapeutic decisions. We estimated the relative influence of efficacy, tolerability, expected adherence and route of administration of a chemotherapy treatment on 203 French physicians' preferences who participated in a Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE), a quantitative method used to elicit preferences. From a questionnaire with six scenarii, respondents had to choose between two treatments which differed with respect to these four attributes. Scenarii were first presented in a curative setting then in a palliative setting. Efficacy, tolerability and expected adherence had two modalities (good versus moderate) and route of administration had three modalities (intravenous ((sic)286-379/session), oral with the current tariff ((sic)28/consultation), oral with a hypothetical tariff ((sic)114)). Efficacy was the reference criterion in choosing a treatment whatever the therapeutic goal(beta:2.114, p < 0.0001 in curative setting versus beta: 1.063, p < 0.0001 in palliative setting). The oral route of administration was important but only in a palliative setting (beta: 0.612, p = 0.035, and beta: 0.506, p < 0.0001 for the current and hypothetical tariff, respectively). Removing the efficacy attribute from logistic regression model, tolerability (beta: 1.228, p = 0.0001) and expected adherence (beta: 1.223, p = 0.0001) were influent in curative setting while the route of administration was still predominant in palliative setting (beta: 0.431, p < 0.0001). Results suggest that economic considerations as well as therapeutic efficacy play a significant role in choosing a treatment. Preference for oral chemotherapy with a hypothetical tariff for a patient support programme should be considered for the development of therapeutic education and healthcare coordination, currently not taken into account in the tariff of oral chemotherapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:912 / 920
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INFLUENCE OF ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS RELATED TO THE PRESCRIPTION OF ORAL AND INTRAVENOUS CHEMOTHERAPY ON PHYSICIANS' PREFERENCES: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Benjamin, L.
    Cotte, F. E.
    Philippe, C.
    Mercier, F.
    Bachelot, T.
    Vidal-Trecan, G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (07) : A459 - A459
  • [2] PHYSICIANS' PREFERENCES WITH RESPECT TO ADHERENCE PROGRAMS: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Mueller, S.
    Ziemssen, T.
    Diehm, C.
    Duncker, T.
    Hoffmanns, P.
    Thate-Waschke, I
    Schuerks, M.
    Wilke, T.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S321 - S321
  • [3] Patient and physician preferences for anticancer drugs for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a discrete-choice experiment
    Gonzalez, Juan Marcos
    Ogale, Sarika
    Morlock, Robert
    Posner, Joshua
    Hauber, Brett
    Sommer, Nicolas
    Grothey, Axel
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2017, 9 : 149 - 158
  • [4] Pharmacist Preferences for Prescribing Models in primary Care in NZ: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Raghunandan, Rakhee
    Marra, Carlo A.
    Tordoff, June
    Smith, Alesha
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01): : 143 - 143
  • [5] A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT STUDY OF PHYSICIANS' PREFERENCES FOR TREATMENTS FOR ENDOMETRIOSIS-ASSOCIATED
    Estes, Stephanie J.
    Poulos, Christine
    Xu, Yanqing
    Botha, Willings
    Leach, Colton
    Wrobleski, Kris K.
    Gordon, Keith
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (03) : E205 - E205
  • [6] TRANSPLANT PHYSICIANS' PREFERENCES IN DECEASED ORGAN ALLOCATION: A PILOT DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Oedingen, C.
    Bartling, T.
    Schrem, H.
    Krauth, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S501 - S501
  • [7] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients' and Physicians' Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Seo, Jaein
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Ueda, Kaname
    Zhang, Dian
    Danno, Daisuke
    Tockhorn-Heidenreich, Antje
    NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (02) : 651 - 668
  • [8] Discrete Choice Experiment to Understand Japanese Patients’ and Physicians’ Preferences for Preventive Treatments for Migraine
    Jaein Seo
    Tommi Tervonen
    Kaname Ueda
    Dian Zhang
    Daisuke Danno
    Antje Tockhorn-Heidenreich
    Neurology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 651 - 668
  • [9] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M.
    Atherly, Adam J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2020, 26 (07): : E219 - +
  • [10] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
    Atherly, Adam
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01): : 142 - 142