Life cycle energy and GHG emissions of PET recycling: change-oriented effects

被引:69
|
作者
Shen, Li [1 ]
Nieuwlaar, Evert [1 ]
Worrell, Ernst [2 ]
Patel, Martin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Innovat & Environm Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT | 2011年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
Bio-based PET; Change-oriented; LCA; PET; Recycling; Open-loop; Energy; Global warming; Packaging; ASSESSMENT LCA; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-011-0296-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The demand of PET bottles has increased rapidly in the past decades. The purpose of this study is to understand the environmental impact of PET recycling system, in which used bottles are recycled into both fibre and bottles, and to compare the recycling system with single-use PET. Consequential LCA modelling was applied to understand four change-oriented effects for the recycling system. These include the effect of multiple-recycling trips, the effect of changing the share of recycled PET pellets used to make bottles or fibre, the effect of changing the reference system and the effect of introducing bio-based PET. The functional unit of the baseline case was determined as 350 kg of bottles and 650 kg of fibre based on the current market demand of PET. The system boundary is cradle to grave excluding the use phase. We applied the "system expansion" method to open-loop recycling. The analysis compares the baseline recycling system, where PET is recycled once, with the reference system, where PET is not recycled. The environmental impacts assessed are non-renewable energy use and global warming. The baseline recycling system reduces both impacts by 20% when compared to the reference system. Multiple-recycling trips can maximally reduce the impacts by 26% but the additional savings are negligible after three recycling trips. Bottle-to-fibre recycling offers more impact reduction than bottle-to-bottle recycling when more fibre is needed than bottles in a functional unit. The maximal impact reduction of 25% can be achieved when all recycled PET pellets are used to make fibre. If the functional unit is reversed, i.e. changed to 650 kg of bottles and 350 kg of fibre, 30% of the impact reduction can be achieved. Both impacts can be further reduced when the quantity of the recycled PET is maximised. The bio-based PET recycling system, offers at least 36% impact reduction, has the lowest impact among all systems studied. The sensitivity analyses show that the recycled PET content in a recycled bottle is not influential to the overall environmental performance. All PET recycling systems in this study show important impact reduction compared to the reference system. The impact savings are around 20-30% depends on the configurations of the recycling system. We conclude that the system's environmental impact can be optimised by maximising the amount of recycled PET in the system and by using bio-based polymers.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 536
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Life Cycle GHG Emissions from Microalgal Biodiesel - A CA-GREET Model
    Woertz, Ian C.
    Benemann, John R.
    Du, Niu
    Unnasch, Stefan
    Mendola, Dominick
    Mitchell, B. Greg
    Lundquist, Tryg J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (11) : 6060 - 6068
  • [42] The product process service life cycle assessment framework to estimate GHG emissions for highways
    Mukherjee, Amlan (amlan@mtu.edu), 1600, Springer Verlag (204):
  • [43] Update on the Life-Cycle GHG Emissions of Passenger Vehicles: Literature Review and Harmonization
    Raugei, Marco
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (19)
  • [44] Life-cycle GHG emission factors of final energy in China
    Jiang Lixue
    Ou Xunmin
    Ma Linwei
    Li Zheng
    Ni Weidou
    GHGT-11, 2013, 37 : 2848 - 2855
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of energy and GHG emissions during ethanol production from grass straws using various pretreatment processes
    Deepak Kumar
    Ganti S. Murthy
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2012, 17 : 388 - 401
  • [46] Fostering the use of sustainable design to reduce energy use and GHG emissions at Canadian universities: a life cycle cost analysis approach
    Walsh, Philip R.
    Dunne, Holly
    Nikoubakht-Tak, Omid Nikoubakht-Tak
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023,
  • [47] Thermal-Energy Analysis and Life Cycle GHG Emissions Assessments of Innovative Earth-Based Bamboo Plastering Mortars
    Moura Paiva, Rayane de Lima
    Caldas, Lucas Rosse
    de Souza Martins, Adriana Paiva
    de Sousa, Patricia Brandao
    de Oliveira, Giulia Fea
    Toledo Filho, Romildo Dias
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [48] Life cycle GHG emissions from Malaysian oil palm bioenergy development: The impact on transportation sector's energy security
    Hassan, Mohd Nor Azman
    Jaramillo, Paulina
    Griffin, W. Michael
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2615 - 2625
  • [49] Life cycle assessment of energy and GHG emissions during ethanol production from grass straws using various pretreatment processes
    Kumar, Deepak
    Murthy, Ganti S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04): : 388 - 401
  • [50] Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emissions of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification in comparison with surface coal gasification
    Liu, Huan
    Liu, Shuqin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (14) : 9630 - 9643