Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability

被引:62
|
作者
Tremblay, Sara [1 ,2 ]
Larochelle-Brunet, Felix [1 ]
Lafleur, Louis-Philippe [1 ]
El Mouderrib, Sofia [1 ]
Lepage, Jean-Francois [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Theoret, Hugo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Sobell Dept Motor Neurosci & Movement Disorders, 33 Queen Sq, London WC1N 3BG, England
[3] CHU Sherbrooke, Ctr Rech, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Pediat, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Quebec Trois Rivieres, Trois Rivieres, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
inter-subject variability; motor evoked potential variability; primary motor cortex; transcranial direct current stimulation; NONINVASIVE BRAIN-STIMULATION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; VARIABILITY; PLASTICITY; HUMANS; MODEL; TDCS;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13321
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Since the initial demonstration of linear effects of stimulation duration and intensity on the strength of after-effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), few studies have systematically assessed how varying these parameters modulates corticospinal excitability. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the effects of anodal tDCS on corticospinal excitability at two stimulation intensities (1mA, 2mA) and durations (10min, 20min), and determine the value of several variables in predicting response. Two groups of 20 individuals received, in two separate sessions, 1 and 2mA anodal tDCS (left primary motor cortex (M1)-right supra-orbital montage) for either 10- or 20-min. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over left M1 and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of the contralateral hand were recorded prior to tDCS and every 5min for 20-min post-tDCS. The following predictive variables were evaluated: I-wave recruitment, stimulation intensity, baseline M1 excitability and inter-trial MEP variability. Results show that anodal tDCS failed to significantly modulate corticospinal excitability in all conditions. Furthermore, low response rates were identified across all parameter combinations. No baseline measure was significantly correlated with increases in MEP amplitude. However, a decrease in inter-trial MEP variability was linked to response to anodal tDCS. In conclusion, the present findings are consistent with recent reports showing high levels of inter-subject variability in the neurophysiological response to tDCS, which may partly explain inconsistent group results. Furthermore, the level of variability in the neurophysiological outcome measure, i.e. MEPs, appears to be related to response.
引用
收藏
页码:2184 / 2190
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acute Changes in Motor Cortical Excitability During Slow Oscillatory and Constant Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Bergmann, Til Ole
    Groppa, Sergiu
    Seeger, Markus
    Moelle, Matthias
    Marshall, Lisa
    Siebner, Hartwig Roman
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 102 (04) : 2303 - 2311
  • [32] Accelerated anodal transcranial direct current stimulation targeting cerebellum and primary motor cortex in the management of tardive dyskinesia: A case study
    Kar, Sujita Kumar
    Singh, Amit
    Kapoor, Sauraj
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2023, 89
  • [33] No Modulation of Visual Cortex Excitability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Brueckner, Sabrina
    Kammer, Thomas
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [34] Concurrent anodal transcranial direct-current stimulation and motor task to influence sensorimotor cortex activation
    Besson, Pierre
    Muthalib, Makii
    Dray, Gerard
    Rothwell, John
    Perrey, Stephane
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 1710 : 181 - 187
  • [35] Transcranial direct current stimulation in stroke - Motor excitability and motor function
    Yasaroglu, Sinan
    Liepert, Joachim
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 144 : 16 - 22
  • [36] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex increases cortical voluntary activation and neural plasticity
    Frazer, Ashlyn
    Williams, Jacqueline
    Spittle, Michael
    Rantalainen, Timo
    Kidgell, Dawson
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2016, 54 (05) : 903 - 913
  • [37] Focal and bidirectional modulation of lower limb motor cortex using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation
    Madhavan, Sangeetha
    Stinear, James W.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2010, 3 (01) : 42 - 50
  • [38] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Over the Motor Cortex Increases Sympathetic Nerve Activity
    Clancy, Jennifer A.
    Johnson, Robyn
    Raw, Rachael
    Deuchars, Susan A.
    Deuchars, Jim
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2014, 7 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [39] Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the motor cortex reduces chronic pain in Alcock canal syndrome
    Ricci, Raffaella
    Ghiggia, Ada
    La Rosa, Ilenia
    Milano, Azzurra
    Troni, Walter
    George, Mark S.
    Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
    Castelli, Lorys
    Salatino, Adriana
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (03) : 648 - 650
  • [40] Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over premotor cortex facilitates observational learning of a motor sequence
    Wade, Stephanie
    Hammond, Geoff
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 41 (12) : 1597 - 1602