Cortical evoked responses following esophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

被引:27
|
作者
Hollerbach, S
Hudoba, P
Fitzpatrick, D
Hunt, R
Upton, ARM
Tougas, G
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, GI Div, Med Ctr,Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
evoked potentials; mechanical stimulation; electrical stimulation; vagal afferents; conduction velocity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026667123187
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recording of evoked potential responses represents an objective and quantifiable method to study visceral afferent sensory pathways in humans. We examined the evoked responses to mechanical distension (balloon) and electrical stimulation of the proximal and distal esophagus. A standard manometric catheter with a latex balloon and an additional electrode attached to its body was placed in the lower esophagus in 15 healthy young volunteers. Repeated nonpainful balloon distension stimuli above the individual sensation threshold (0.17 Hz, 12-20 mi) or short electrical impulses (0.2 Hz, 12-16 mA) were delivered in an alternate fashion at 23 and 33 cm from the nares. Evoked potential responses (EP) were recorded through 22 scalp surface electrodes using the standard 10/20 International EEG system of electrode placement. Balloon distension produced a reproducible triphasic response at both sites. Peak latencies of three negative EP peaks were 92 +/- 17, 229 +/- 40, and 339 +/- 36 msec with proximal stimulation versus 154 +/- 24, 275 +/- 24, and 384 +/- 30 msec obtained with distal stimulation (P < 0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a triphasic response with significantly shorter peak latencies at both sites when compared to mechanical stimulation (P < 0.001). Peak latencies were 74 +/- 12, 137 +/- 11, and 245 +/- 27 msec proximal versus 83 +/- 12, 148 +/- 32, and 247 +/- 51 msec with distal stimulation (P < 0.01). The calculated conduction velocities for both modes of stimulation (balloon: 1.73 +/- 0.9 m/sec vs electrical: 10.1 +/- 3.4 m/sec) are compatible with conduction through C fibers and A delta fibers, respectively. Both modes of stimulation produce characteristic brain responses that are conveyed through different types of afferent fibers. The respective contributions of both types of fibers to esophageal function and symptomatology can be specifically addressed using this approach in both normal and pathologic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2558 / 2566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cortical evoked responses (CEP) to esophageal electrical stimulation before, and after, acid sensitization of viscero-afferent neural pathways
    Nowak, JH
    Elsenbruch, S
    Dienefeld, C
    Haupts, M
    Kamath, MV
    Tougas, G
    Hollerbach, S
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A681 - A681
  • [22] CORTICAL EVOKED RESPONSES TO VESTIBULAR STIMULATION IN MAN
    MOLINARI, GA
    MINGRINO, S
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1974, 88 (06): : 515 - 521
  • [23] CAPSAICIN DIFFERENTIALLY INFLUENCES SOMATOSENSORY CORTICAL RESPONSES EVOKED BY PERIPHERAL ELECTRICAL OR MECHANICAL STIMULATION
    TOLDI, J
    JOO, F
    WOLFE, JR
    NEUROSCIENCE, 1992, 49 (01) : 135 - 139
  • [24] Optical Imaging of Visual Cortical Responses Evoked by Transcorneal Electrical Stimulation With Different Parameters
    Ma, Zengguang
    Cao, Pengjia
    Sun, Pengcheng
    Li, Liming
    Lu, Yiliang
    Yan, Yan
    Chen, Yao
    Chai, Xinyu
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (08) : 5320 - 5331
  • [25] The comparison of cortical responses evoked by transcorneal electrical and visual stimulation by intrinsic optical imaging
    Chen, Yao
    Sun, Pengcheng
    Lu, Zhuofan
    Chai, Xinyu
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [26] CARDIAC EFFECTS OF ESOPHAGEAL STIMULATION IN HEALTHY-VOLUNTEERS
    TOUGAS, G
    KAMATH, MV
    FITZPATRICK, D
    WATTEEL, G
    FALLEN, EL
    HUNT, RH
    UPTON, ARM
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (04) : A579 - A579
  • [27] Effects of octreotide on esophageal visceral perception and cerebral evoked potentials induced by balloon distension
    Johnston, BT
    Shils, J
    Leite, LP
    Castell, DO
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1999, 94 (01): : 65 - 70
  • [28] SPATIOTEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION OF HUMAN ESOPHAGEAL EVOKED CORTICAL RESPONSES
    AZIZ, Q
    FURLONG, P
    BARLOW, J
    HOBSON, A
    ALANI, S
    HARDING, G
    THOMPSON, DG
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1994, 106 (04) : A461 - A461
  • [29] Simultaneous recording of cortical and spinal evoked potentials in response to electrical stimulation of the rectum in healthy subjects
    Walsh, MM
    Lovely, LK
    Beydoun, AA
    Wiley, J
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A251 - A251
  • [30] Trigeminal responses evoked by painful electrical stimulation
    Svensson, P
    Bakke, M
    Michler, L
    Arendt-Nielsen, L
    Moller, E
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (02) : 128 - 134