Cortical evoked responses following esophageal balloon distension and electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

被引:27
|
作者
Hollerbach, S
Hudoba, P
Fitzpatrick, D
Hunt, R
Upton, ARM
Tougas, G
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, GI Div, Med Ctr,Div Gastroenterol, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Med, Dept Neurol, Med Ctr, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
evoked potentials; mechanical stimulation; electrical stimulation; vagal afferents; conduction velocity;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026667123187
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recording of evoked potential responses represents an objective and quantifiable method to study visceral afferent sensory pathways in humans. We examined the evoked responses to mechanical distension (balloon) and electrical stimulation of the proximal and distal esophagus. A standard manometric catheter with a latex balloon and an additional electrode attached to its body was placed in the lower esophagus in 15 healthy young volunteers. Repeated nonpainful balloon distension stimuli above the individual sensation threshold (0.17 Hz, 12-20 mi) or short electrical impulses (0.2 Hz, 12-16 mA) were delivered in an alternate fashion at 23 and 33 cm from the nares. Evoked potential responses (EP) were recorded through 22 scalp surface electrodes using the standard 10/20 International EEG system of electrode placement. Balloon distension produced a reproducible triphasic response at both sites. Peak latencies of three negative EP peaks were 92 +/- 17, 229 +/- 40, and 339 +/- 36 msec with proximal stimulation versus 154 +/- 24, 275 +/- 24, and 384 +/- 30 msec obtained with distal stimulation (P < 0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a triphasic response with significantly shorter peak latencies at both sites when compared to mechanical stimulation (P < 0.001). Peak latencies were 74 +/- 12, 137 +/- 11, and 245 +/- 27 msec proximal versus 83 +/- 12, 148 +/- 32, and 247 +/- 51 msec with distal stimulation (P < 0.01). The calculated conduction velocities for both modes of stimulation (balloon: 1.73 +/- 0.9 m/sec vs electrical: 10.1 +/- 3.4 m/sec) are compatible with conduction through C fibers and A delta fibers, respectively. Both modes of stimulation produce characteristic brain responses that are conveyed through different types of afferent fibers. The respective contributions of both types of fibers to esophageal function and symptomatology can be specifically addressed using this approach in both normal and pathologic conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2558 / 2566
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cortical Evoked Responses Following Esophageal Balloon Distension and Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers
    Stephan Hollerbach
    Peter Hudoba
    Debbie Fitzpatrick
    Richard Hunt
    Adrian R.M. Upton
    Gervais Tougas
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 1998, 43 : 2558 - 2566
  • [2] ESOPHAGEAL RESPONSES TO DISTENSION AND ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
    CHRISTENSEN, J
    LUND, GF
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1969, 48 (02): : 408 - +
  • [3] THE CORTICAL EVOKED-RESPONSES PRODUCED BY BALLOON DISTENSION AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE ESOPHAGUS INVOLVE DIFFERENT AFFERENT VAGAL FIBERS
    TOUGAS, G
    FITZPATRICK, D
    UPTON, ARM
    HUNT, RH
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 104 (04) : A592 - A592
  • [4] Abnormal High Resolution Esophageal Manometry and Esophageal Balloon Distension Test in Healthy Volunteers: Is There a Correlation?
    Akhauri, Bhavya
    Bayman, Levent
    Valestin, Jessica
    Schey, Ron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 108 : S25 - S25
  • [5] TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING AND CONDUCTION-VELOCITY OF CORTICAL RESPONSES EVOKED BY ESOPHAGEAL DISTENSION
    AZIZ, Q
    FURLONG, P
    BARLOW, J
    HOBSON, A
    WHITTLE, D
    ALANI, S
    BANCEWICZ, J
    THOMPSON, DG
    GUT, 1992, 33 (02) : S54 - S54
  • [6] Evoked cortical responses following multifocal electrical stimulation in the subretinal space of rabbit and minipig.
    Schwahn, HN
    Gekeler, FE
    Sachs, HG
    Kobuch, K
    Koehler, M
    Jakob, W
    Gabel, VP
    Zrenner, E
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S102 - S102
  • [7] LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER RESPONSES TO PROLONGED BALLOON DISTENSION OF THE ESOPHAGEAL BODY
    PATERSON, WG
    RATTAN, S
    GOYAL, RK
    CLINICAL AND INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE-MEDECINE CLINIQUE ET EXPERIMENTALE, 1986, 9 (03): : A52 - A52
  • [8] CEREBRAL-EVOKED POTENTIAL RESPONSES FOLLOWING DIRECT VAGAL AND ESOPHAGEAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION IN HUMANS
    TOUGAS, G
    HUDOBA, P
    FITZPATRICK, D
    HUNT, RH
    UPTON, ARM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 264 (03): : G486 - G491
  • [9] PERCEPTION OF ESOPHAGEAL DISTENSION WITH FLIP PANOMETRY IN HEALTHY, ASYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS
    Simlote, Aditi
    Masihi, Melina
    Prescott, Jacqueline
    Pandolfino, John E.
    Carlson, Dustin
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S345 - S345
  • [10] Characterizing cortical responses evoked by electrical stimulation of the mouse infraorbital nerve
    Suminski, Aaron J.
    Ness, Jared P.
    Zeng, Weifeng
    Novello, Joseph
    Brodnick, Sarah K.
    Pisaniello, Jane
    Dingle, Aaron M.
    Poore, Samuel O.
    Lake, Wendell B.
    Williams, Justin C.
    2018 40TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2018, : 4756 - 4759