Depression determines illness conviction and pain impact: A structural equation modeling analysis

被引:18
|
作者
Davis, PJ
Reeves, JL
Hastie, BA
Graff-Radford, SB
Naliboff, BD
机构
[1] Alliant Univ, Fresno, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Dent, Sect Oral Med & Orofacial Pain, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Pain Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Behav Med Network, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychiat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] W Los Angeles VA Hlth Care Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
headache; orofacial pain; factor analysis; structural equation modeling; MMPI-2; MPI; BDI; VAS; depression;
D O I
10.1046/j.1526-4637.2000.00032.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective. The present study sought to derive an algorithm using factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) to describe headache and orofacial pain patients using measures of behavioral and psychological functioning. This investigation further examined whether the underlying factor structure differed in 3 presumed distinct diagnostic categories: myofascial, neuropathic, and neurovascular pain. Design. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 ((MMPI-2), Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and visual analog scale for functional limitation (VAS-FL) were administered to the subjects. A split group design was used. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to describe distinct factor domains in the first group. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using SEM tested this structure in the second group and described causal relationships between the revealed (latent) factors. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for differences in demographic variables and diagnostic group factor structure. Setting. The Pain Center is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary pain medicine program at Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. Subjects. Three hundred and ninety (N = 390) subjects were assigned to 1 of 3 diagnostic categories: myofascial pain syndrome, neuropathic pain, or neurovascular pain. Results. EFA revealed a 3-factor solution. The factors were labeled Depression, Illness Conviction, and Pain Impact, reflecting the content of their respective variables with highest loadings. CFA using SEM validated the 3-factor solution, and further revealed that Depression was a critical causal factor determining Illness Conviction and Pain Impact. No causal relationship was observed between Illness Conviction and Pain Impact. ANOVA found no differences in demographics. No difference in factor structure emerged for the 3 diagnostic categories. Conclusions. Analysis derived a 3-factor solution. The factors were Pain Impact, Illness Conviction, and Depression. SEM revealed the critical causal pathway showing that Depression determined Illness Conviction and Pain Impact. We conclude that the main target for pain treatment is depression. No differences in factor structure were found for the 3 diagnostic categories of myofascial, neuropathic, or neurovascular pain. This suggests that psychological processes are similar in chronic headache and orofacial pain patients despite their presumed distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. SME is a powerful methodology to construct causal models that has been underutilized in the pain literature.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 246
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Structural Equation Modeling of Seam Failures Analysis
    Ghani, Suzaini Abdul
    Yahya, Mohamad Faizul
    Gong, Hugh
    2012 IEEE COLLOQUIUM ON HUMANITIES, SCIENCE & ENGINEERING RESEARCH (CHUSER 2012), 2012,
  • [22] Analysis of elderly mobility by structural equation modeling
    Kim, S
    TRAVELER BEHAVIOR AND VALUES 2003: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION, 2003, (1854): : 81 - 89
  • [23] Hierarchical Regression Analysis in Structural Equation Modeling
    de Jong, Peter F.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (02) : 198 - 211
  • [24] AN ANALYSIS OF RECENT CRITIQUES OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
    BENTLER, P
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1988, 15 (01) : 97 - 98
  • [25] Structural equation modeling by extended redundancy analysis
    Hwang, HS
    Takane, Y
    MEASUREMENT AND MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2002, : 115 - 124
  • [26] A Primer on Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: the Case of Depression
    Valentine, Jeffrey C.
    Cheung, Mike W-L
    Smith, Eric J.
    Alexander, Olivia
    Hatton, Jessica M.
    Hong, Ryan Y.
    Huckaby, Lucas T.
    Patton, Samantha C.
    Possel, Patrick
    Seely, Hayley D.
    PREVENTION SCIENCE, 2022, 23 (03) : 346 - 365
  • [27] A Primer on Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling: the Case of Depression
    Jeffrey C. Valentine
    Mike W.-L. Cheung
    Eric J. Smith
    Olivia Alexander
    Jessica M. Hatton
    Ryan Y. Hong
    Lucas T. Huckaby
    Samantha C. Patton
    Patrick Pössel
    Hayley D. Seely
    Prevention Science, 2022, 23 : 346 - 365
  • [28] Intergenerational relationship, family social support, and depression among Chinese elderly: A structural equation modeling analysis
    Li Chunkai
    Jiang Shan
    Zhang Xinwen
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2019, 248 : 73 - 80
  • [29] Social support and its associations with Depression and Anxiety: an in-depth Analysis using Structural Equation Modeling
    Schetsche, Christian
    Jaume, Luis Carlos
    Gago-Galvagno, Lucas
    Elgier, Angel Manuel
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (02): : 1 - 19
  • [30] Motivation for achievement as perceived resource value in social rank theory of depression: A structural equation modeling analysis
    Tse, Wai S.
    Wu, Jayne
    Poon, Kai-Chung
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (07) : 1034 - 1038