Cost-Benefit Analysis of Solar Thermal Plants with Storage in a Hydrothermal System

被引:4
|
作者
Trama, Cibelle Pereira [1 ]
Pereira Junior, Amaro Olimpio [1 ]
Cardoso Guimaraes, Ana Paula [2 ]
Diniz, Andre Luiz [2 ]
Reis Vieira, Leonardo dos Santos [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Rio de Janeiro PPE COPPE UFRJ, Alberto Luiz Coimbra Inst Grad Studies & Engn Res, Energy Planning Program, BR-21941914 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Elect Energy Res Ctr CEPEL, BR-21941911 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
concentrated solar power; thermal energy storage; levelized cost of electricity; energy value; net cost of electricity; hydrothermal system; POWER CSP; TECHNOLOGIES; WIND;
D O I
10.3390/en14185662
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Economic feasibility studies of concentrated solar power (CSP) plants with thermal energy storage (TES) systems have been mainly based on the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), disregarding the economic benefits to the electricity system resulting from the dispatchability of the CSP plants. The analysis of these benefits is essential since the existence of storage can provide greater operating flexibility to the system. Although there are few studies on the benefits of CSP plants in thermoelectric systems, this analysis has not yet been done in a predominantly hydroelectric system. In this paper, CSP plants with TES systems were inserted in a hydrothermal system in order to estimate the economic benefits and the net cost of electricity generated by those plants. The System Advisor Model (SAM) and the hydrothermal scheduling model DESSEM were used in a real case study of inclusion of CSP plants in the Brazilian system. The results indicate that the cost of a CSP plant, previously estimated by the LCOE, can be reduced by at least 37% when considering its benefits to a hydrothermal system, increasing its competitiveness with other technologies. Therefore, we propose the use of the net cost for an appropriate comparison among energy sources.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pediatric cost-benefit analysis
    Schulze-Gattermann, H
    Illg, A
    Lesinski-Schiedat, A
    Schoenermark, M
    Bertram, B
    Lenarz, T
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2003, 82 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [42] Cost-benefit analysis is the key
    Kelnar, CJH
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2000, 83 (02) : 176 - 177
  • [43] Is cost-benefit analysis for everyone?
    Sunstein, CR
    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 2001, 53 (01) : 299 - 314
  • [44] Sustainability and cost-benefit analysis
    Pires, C
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 1998, 30 (12) : 2181 - 2194
  • [45] THE RELATIONSHIP COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
    不详
    PSYCHOLOGIST, 2011, 24 (09) : 643 - 643
  • [46] Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Atkinson, Giles
    Mourato, Susana
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2008, 33 : 317 - 344
  • [47] On justifying cost-benefit analysis
    Kornhauser, LA
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (02): : 1037 - 1057
  • [48] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Voltage Sag Mitigation Methods in Cement Plants
    Goswami, Arup Kumar
    Gupta, Chandra Prakash
    Singh, Girish Kumar
    2014 IEEE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HARMONICS AND QUALITY OF POWER (ICHQP), 2014, : 866 - 870
  • [49] Contribution of cost-benefit analysis to optimization of eco-design plants
    Mellal, Leila
    Djebabra, Mebarek
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 13 (02) : 334 - 346
  • [50] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS METHOD FOR VARIOUS RECORD STORAGE MEDIA.
    Snyder, Barton E.
    1600, (17):