The cost-effectiveness of depression screening for the general adult population

被引:4
|
作者
Yildirim, Melike [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gaynes, Bradley N. [5 ,6 ]
Keskinocak, Pinar [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Pence, Brian W. [6 ]
Swann, Julie [8 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Hlth & Humanitarian Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Med Practice Evaluat Ctr, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Hlth, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, 111 Lampe Dr CB7906, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Major depression; Minor depression; Routine screening; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); DOUBLE-BLIND; RECURRENCE; DISORDER; PLACEBO; SYMPTOMS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Depression is a treatable disease, and untreated depression can lead to serious health complications and decrease the quality of life. Therefore, prevention, early identification, and treatment efforts are essential. Screening has an essential role in preventive medicine in the general population. Ideally, screening tools detect patients early enough to manage the disease and reduce symptoms. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of routine screening schedules. Methods: We used a discrete-time nonstationary Markov model to simulate the progression of depression. We used Monte Carlo techniques to simulate the stochastic model for 20 years or during the lifetime of individuals. Baseline and screening scenario models with screening frequencies of annual, 2-year, and 5-year strategies were compared based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and one-way sensitivity analysis were conducted to manage uncertainties. Results: In the general population, all screening strategies were cost-effective compared to the baseline. However, male and female populations differed based on cost over quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Females had lower ICERs, and annual screening had the highest ICER for females, with 11,134$/QALY gained. In contrast, males had around three times higher ICER, with annual screening costs of 34,065$/QALY gained. Limitations: We assumed that the screening frequency was not changing at any time during the screening scenario. In our calculations, false-positive cases were not taking into account. Conclusions: Considering the high lifetime prevalence and recurrence rates of depression, detection and prevention efforts can be one critical cornerstone to support required care. Our analysis combined the expected benefits and costs of screening and assessed the effectiveness of screening scenarios. We conclude that routine screening is cost-effective for all age groups of females and young, middle-aged males.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 314
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness of one-time screening for hepatitis C virus infection in Korean general population
    Kim, K. -A.
    Chung, W.
    Choi, H. Y.
    Jang, E. S.
    Ki, M.
    Jeong, S. -H.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 68 : S326 - S326
  • [42] Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies in adult patients with depression - Comment
    Falissard, B
    Gasquet, I
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 49 (02): : 204 - 205
  • [43] Cost-effectiveness of screening for HIV
    Thrasher, AD
    Ford, CL
    Nearing, KA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (20): : 2137 - 2137
  • [44] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LEAD SCREENING
    BERWICK, DM
    KOMAROFF, AL
    SHERMAN, H
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 28 (02): : A291 - A291
  • [45] The cost-effectiveness of cervical screening
    Smith, WJ
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 11 (01) : 83 - 85
  • [46] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SCREENING FOR HEMOCHROMATOSIS
    GUZMAN, G
    PHATAK, PD
    WOLL, J
    PHELPS, CE
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 39 (02): : A348 - A348
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening
    Black, WC
    Tosteson, ANA
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (02): : 111 - 111
  • [48] Cost-effectiveness of Chlamydial screening
    Howell, MR
    Gaydos, CA
    Quinn, TC
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 1998, 25 (08) : 406 - 407
  • [49] The cost-effectiveness of cancer screening
    De Koning, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 : S20 - S21
  • [50] Cost-effectiveness of Screening in an Outbreak
    Wang, I-Jen
    Huang, Yeun-Chih
    Chen, Pau-Chung
    Wu, Yu-Nian
    Lin, Shoei-Loong
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (01) : S275 - S275