The cost-effectiveness of depression screening for the general adult population

被引:4
|
作者
Yildirim, Melike [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gaynes, Bradley N. [5 ,6 ]
Keskinocak, Pinar [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Pence, Brian W. [6 ]
Swann, Julie [8 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Ctr Hlth & Humanitarian Syst, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Inst Technol Assessment, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Med Practice Evaluat Ctr, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychiat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Hlth, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Atlanta, GA USA
[8] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, 111 Lampe Dr CB7906, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Cost-effectiveness; Major depression; Minor depression; Routine screening; Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER); DOUBLE-BLIND; RECURRENCE; DISORDER; PLACEBO; SYMPTOMS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.044
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Depression is a treatable disease, and untreated depression can lead to serious health complications and decrease the quality of life. Therefore, prevention, early identification, and treatment efforts are essential. Screening has an essential role in preventive medicine in the general population. Ideally, screening tools detect patients early enough to manage the disease and reduce symptoms. We aimed to determine the cost-effectiveness of routine screening schedules. Methods: We used a discrete-time nonstationary Markov model to simulate the progression of depression. We used Monte Carlo techniques to simulate the stochastic model for 20 years or during the lifetime of individuals. Baseline and screening scenario models with screening frequencies of annual, 2-year, and 5-year strategies were compared based on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and one-way sensitivity analysis were conducted to manage uncertainties. Results: In the general population, all screening strategies were cost-effective compared to the baseline. However, male and female populations differed based on cost over quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Females had lower ICERs, and annual screening had the highest ICER for females, with 11,134$/QALY gained. In contrast, males had around three times higher ICER, with annual screening costs of 34,065$/QALY gained. Limitations: We assumed that the screening frequency was not changing at any time during the screening scenario. In our calculations, false-positive cases were not taking into account. Conclusions: Considering the high lifetime prevalence and recurrence rates of depression, detection and prevention efforts can be one critical cornerstone to support required care. Our analysis combined the expected benefits and costs of screening and assessed the effectiveness of screening scenarios. We conclude that routine screening is cost-effective for all age groups of females and young, middle-aged males.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 314
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
    Launoy, G
    Berchi, C
    [J]. REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 49 (01): : 102 - 103
  • [2] Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population
    Frazier, AL
    Colditz, GA
    Fuchs, CS
    Kuntz, KM
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (15): : 1954 - 1961
  • [3] The Cost-effectiveness of General Population HCV Screening in India
    Chaillon, Antoine
    Mehta, Sanjay R.
    Hoenigl, Martin
    Vickerman, Peter
    Hickman, Matthew
    Skaathun, Britt
    Martin, Natasha K.
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 410A - 410A
  • [4] Cost-effectiveness of screening for chronic kidney disease in the general adult population: a systematic review
    Yeo, See Cheng
    Wang, Hankun
    Ang, Yee Gary
    Lim, Chee Kong
    Ooi, Xi Yan
    [J]. CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [5] Cost-effectiveness and Population Outcomes of General Population Screening for Hepatitis C
    Coffin, Phillip O.
    Scott, John D.
    Golden, Matthew R.
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2012, 54 (09) : 1259 - 1271
  • [6] Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for Celiac disease in the adult population
    Shamir, Raanan
    Hernell, Olle
    Leshno, Moshe
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2006, 26 (03) : 282 - 293
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF EXPANDED HIV SCREENING AMONG ADULT POPULATION IN ITALY
    Bini, C.
    Mennini, F. S.
    Rotundo, M.
    Marcellusi, A.
    Antinori, A.
    Sarmati, L.
    Andreoni, M.
    Paoletti, M.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S549 - S549
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness of population genomic screening
    Veenstra, David L.
    Guzauskas, Greg
    Peterson, Josh
    Hassen, Dina A.
    Snyder, Susan
    Hao, Jing
    Williams, Marc
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 21 (12) : 2840 - 2841
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness Models in Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: A Systematic Review
    Schiller-Fruethwirth, Irmgard C.
    Jahn, Beate
    Arvandi, Marjan
    Siebert, Uwe
    [J]. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2017, 15 (03) : 333 - 351
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Models in Breast Cancer Screening in the General Population: A Systematic Review
    Irmgard C. Schiller-Frühwirth
    Beate Jahn
    Marjan Arvandi
    Uwe Siebert
    [J]. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2017, 15 : 333 - 351