Adapalene gel 0.1% is effective and safe for Japanese patients with acne vulgaris: A randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded, controlled study

被引:32
|
作者
Kawashima, Makoto [1 ]
Harada, Shotaro [2 ]
Loesche, Christian [3 ]
Miyachi, Yoshiki [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Dermatol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] E Japan Kanto Hosp, NTT, Dept Dermatol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Galderma R&D, Sophia Antipolis, France
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Dermatol, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
adapalene; adapalene 0.1%; RCT; acne; acne vulgaris; topical retinoids;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.09.012
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Topical retinoids, such as adapalene, are an integral part of acne therapy in most regions and are considered appropriate first-tine therapy by international guidelines for all cases of acne with the exception of the most severe. However, there are currently no topical retinoids available for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japan. Objective: To confirm efficacy and safety of adapalene get 0.1% versus the corresponding get vehicle in the treatment of Japanese patients with acne vulgaris for up to 12 weeks. Methods: A total of 200 patients were randomized to receive adapalene get 0.1%, or vehicle once-daily for 12 weeks. Percent reduction in lesion counts (total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory) and subject satisfaction were evaluated. Safety was monitored through adverse events and laboratory tests. Results: Adapalene get 0.1% produced significantly better reductions in total (P < 0.0001), inflammatory (P = 0.0010), and non-inflammatory lesions (P < 0.0001) at endpoint (week 12, last observation carried forward) than get vehicle, with a higher overall subject satisfaction. The primary efficacy variable, the median percent reduction of total lesion counts at endpoint, was significantly greater with adapalene get 0.1% (63.2%) compared to that with the vehicle (36.9%) in the ITT population (P < 0.0001). Significantly greater results were observed as early as week 1. Adapalene was well tolerated, with adverse events that were mostly mild-to-moderate and transient in nature. Conclusions: Adapalene get 0.1% was effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients. Adapalene was safe and well tolerated, consistent with the good tolerability profile demonstrated in other patient populations. (C) 2007 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects Of Benzoyl Peroxide 5% Clindamycin Combination Gel Versus Adapalene 0.1% on Quality of Life In Patients With Mild to Moderate Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized Single-blind Study
    Guerra-Tapia, Aurora
    JOURNAL OF DRUGS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 11 (06) : 714 - 722
  • [42] A randomized split-face, investigator-blinded study of a picosecond Alexandrite laser for post-inflammatory erythema and acne scars
    Wen, Xiang
    Li, Yong
    Hamblin, Michael R.
    Jiang, Xian
    DERMATOLOGIC THERAPY, 2020, 33 (06)
  • [43] Randomized, investigator-blinded, multicenter study of gatifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate treatment of recurrent and nonresponsive otitis media in children
    Saex-Llorens, X
    Rodriguez, A
    Arguedas, A
    Hamed, KA
    Yang, J
    Pierce, P
    Echols, R
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2005, 24 (04) : 293 - 300
  • [44] A double-blind randomized controlled comparison of APDDR-0901, a novel cosmeceutical formulation, and 0.1% adapalene gel in the treatment of mild-to-moderate acne vulgaris
    Lee, Ha Eun
    Ko, Joo Yeon
    Kim, Young Hoon
    Yoo, Seo Rye
    Moon, Sang Ho
    Kim, Nack In
    Park, ChunWook
    Kim, Jeong Hwan
    Koh, Hyun Ju
    Park, Won Seok
    Ro, Young Suck
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2011, 21 (06) : 959 - 965
  • [45] Efficacy and Safety of a Water-Based Head Lice Lotion: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-Blinded, Comparative, Bicentric Study
    Frank Eertmans
    Bart Rossel
    Lidia Serrano
    Elisabeth Rivera
    Els Adriaens
    Dermatology and Therapy, 2019, 9 : 143 - 157
  • [46] Efficacy and side effect profile of olanzapine versus haloperidol for symptoms of delirium in hospitalized patients with advanced cancer: A multicenter, investigator-blinded, randomized, controlled trial (RCT).
    Van der Vorst, Maurice
    Neefjes, Elisabeth C. W.
    Boddaert, Manon S. A.
    Verdegaal, Bertha A. T. T.
    Beeker, Aart
    Teunissen, Saskia C. C.
    Beekman, Aartjan T. F.
    Wilschut, Janneke A.
    Berkhof, Johannes
    Verheul, Henk M. W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35 (31)
  • [47] Efficacy and Safety of a Water-Based Head Lice Lotion: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-Blinded, Comparative, Bicentric Study
    Eertmans, Frank
    Rossel, Bart
    Serrano, Lidia
    Rivera, Elisabeth
    Adriaens, Els
    DERMATOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2019, 9 (01) : 143 - 157
  • [48] Efficacy and Safety of a Mineral Oil-Based Head Lice Shampoo: A Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-Blinded, Comparative Study
    Wolf, Luise
    Eertmans, Frank
    Wolf, Doerte
    Rossel, Bart
    Adriaens, Els
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [49] A randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, investigator-blinded study of four treatment regimens of posaconazole in adults with toenail onychomycosis
    Elewski, Boni
    Tavakkol, Amir
    Pollak, Richard
    Ashton, Scott
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 62 (03) : AB76 - AB76
  • [50] Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide, a fixed-dose combination for the treatment of acne vulgaris: Results of a multicenter, randomized double-blind, controlled study
    Thiboutot, Diane M.
    Weiss, Jonathan
    Bucko, Alicia
    Eichenfield, Lawrence
    Jones, Terry
    Clark, Scott
    Liu, Yin
    Graeber, Michael
    Kang, Sewon
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 57 (05) : 791 - 799