Adapalene gel 0.1% is effective and safe for Japanese patients with acne vulgaris: A randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded, controlled study

被引:32
|
作者
Kawashima, Makoto [1 ]
Harada, Shotaro [2 ]
Loesche, Christian [3 ]
Miyachi, Yoshiki [4 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Womens Med Univ, Dept Dermatol, Tokyo, Japan
[2] E Japan Kanto Hosp, NTT, Dept Dermatol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Galderma R&D, Sophia Antipolis, France
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Dermatol, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
adapalene; adapalene 0.1%; RCT; acne; acne vulgaris; topical retinoids;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdermsci.2007.09.012
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: Topical retinoids, such as adapalene, are an integral part of acne therapy in most regions and are considered appropriate first-tine therapy by international guidelines for all cases of acne with the exception of the most severe. However, there are currently no topical retinoids available for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japan. Objective: To confirm efficacy and safety of adapalene get 0.1% versus the corresponding get vehicle in the treatment of Japanese patients with acne vulgaris for up to 12 weeks. Methods: A total of 200 patients were randomized to receive adapalene get 0.1%, or vehicle once-daily for 12 weeks. Percent reduction in lesion counts (total, inflammatory, and non-inflammatory) and subject satisfaction were evaluated. Safety was monitored through adverse events and laboratory tests. Results: Adapalene get 0.1% produced significantly better reductions in total (P < 0.0001), inflammatory (P = 0.0010), and non-inflammatory lesions (P < 0.0001) at endpoint (week 12, last observation carried forward) than get vehicle, with a higher overall subject satisfaction. The primary efficacy variable, the median percent reduction of total lesion counts at endpoint, was significantly greater with adapalene get 0.1% (63.2%) compared to that with the vehicle (36.9%) in the ITT population (P < 0.0001). Significantly greater results were observed as early as week 1. Adapalene was well tolerated, with adverse events that were mostly mild-to-moderate and transient in nature. Conclusions: Adapalene get 0.1% was effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris in Japanese patients. Adapalene was safe and well tolerated, consistent with the good tolerability profile demonstrated in other patient populations. (C) 2007 Japanese Society for Investigative Dermatology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.3% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A randomized, multicenter, investigator-blinded, controlled comparison study versus adapalene gel 0.1% and vehicle
    Pariser, DM
    Thiboutot, DM
    Clark, SD
    Jones, TM
    Liu, Y
    Graeber, M
    CUTIS, 2005, 76 (02): : 145 - 151
  • [2] Efficacy and tolerability of combined topical treatment of acne vulgaris with adapalene and clindamycin: A multicenter, randomized, investigator-blinded study
    Wolf, JE
    Kaplan, D
    Kraus, SJ
    Loven, KH
    Rist, T
    Swinyer, LJ
    Baker, MD
    Liu, YS
    Czernielewski, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 49 (03) : S211 - S217
  • [3] Adapalene gel, 0.1%, as maintenance therapy for acne vulgaris - A randomized, controlled, investigator-blind follow-up of a recent combination study
    Thiboutot, Diane M.
    Shalita, Alan R.
    Yamauchi, Paul S.
    Dawson, Catherine
    Kerrouche, Nabil
    Arsonnaud, Stephanie
    Kang, Sewon
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 142 (05) : 597 - 602
  • [4] A randomized placebo-controlled investigator-blinded face split study of 20% azelaic acid cream to evaluate the efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with acne vulgaris
    Hayashi, Nobukazu
    Koyanagi, Eriko
    Nogita, Tositatsu
    Fujiyama, Mika
    Kawashima, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 39 : 249 - 250
  • [5] Multicenter randomized controlled trial on combination therapy with 0.1% adapalene gel and oral antibiotics for acne vulgaris: Comparison of the efficacy of adapalene gel alone and in combination with oral faropenem
    Hayashi, Nobukazu
    Kawashima, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 39 (06): : 511 - 515
  • [6] A double-blinded, randomized, controlled comparison of APDDR-0901 versus 0.1% adapalene gel regimen in the treatment of acne vulgaris
    Park, Hyun Chul
    Lee, Ha Eun
    Ko, Joo Yeon
    Young, Suck Ro
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2010, 37 : 133 - 133
  • [7] The maintenance effect of a treatment with adapalene gel, 0.1% in patients with acne vulgaris
    Zang, JZ
    Feng, LL
    Ting, TY
    Jie, Z
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2004, 50 (03) : P13 - P13
  • [8] Distinct skin microbiome modulation following different topical acne treatments in mild acne vulgaris patients: A randomized, investigator-blinded exploratory study
    Wongtada, Chanidapa
    Prombutara, Pinidphon
    Asawanonda, Pravit
    Noppakun, Nopadon
    Kumtornrut, Chanat
    Chatsuwan, Tanittha
    EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 32 (06) : 906 - 914
  • [9] Clinical and bacteriological evaluation of adapalene 0.1% gel plus nadifloxacin 1% cream versus adapalene 0.1% gel in patients with acne vulgaris
    Takigawa, Masahiro
    Tokura, Yoshiki
    Shimada, Shinji
    Furukawa, Fukumi
    Noguchi, Norihisa
    Ito, Taisuke
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2013, 40 (08): : 620 - 625
  • [10] A comparison of the efficacy and safety of adapalene gel 0.1% and tretinoin gel 0.025% in the treatment of acne vulgaris: A multicenter trial
    Shalita, A
    Weiss, JS
    Chalker, DK
    Ellis, CN
    Greenspan, A
    Katz, HI
    Kantor, I
    Millikan, LE
    Swinehart, T
    Swinyer, L
    Whitmore, C
    Baker, M
    Czemielewski, J
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 34 (03) : 482 - 485