Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election

被引:477
|
作者
Bovet, Alexandre [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Makse, Hernan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] CUNY, Levich Inst, New York, NY 10031 USA
[2] CUNY, Phys Dept, New York, NY 10031 USA
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, ICTEAM, Ave George Lemaitre 4, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
[4] Univ Namur, NaXys, Rempart Vierge 8, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
[5] Univ Namur, Dept Math, Rempart Vierge 8, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
CONFIRMATION; AGE;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co, we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Chen, Emily
    Deb, Ashok
    Ferrara, Emilio
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 5 (01): : 1 - 18
  • [42] #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election
    Emily Chen
    Ashok Deb
    Emilio Ferrara
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2022, 5 : 1 - 18
  • [43] The 2016 US Presidential Election and Its Chinese Audience
    Yue, Jiahua
    Li, Yuke
    Sundquist, James
    SOCIAL MEDIA PROCESSING, SMP 2017, 2017, 774 : 319 - 330
  • [44] Introduction: Gender, media and the 2016 US presidential election
    Portwood-Stacer, Laura
    Berridge, Susan
    FEMINIST MEDIA STUDIES, 2017, 17 (03) : 505 - 505
  • [45] A STUDENT PERSPECTIVE ON AUTHORITARIANISM AND THE US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: 2016
    Denfeld, M.
    ICERI2016: 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION, 2016, : 6775 - 6780
  • [46] Unchurched Christian Nationalism and the 2016 US Presidential Election*
    Stroope, Samuel
    Froese, Paul
    Rackin, Heather M.
    Delehanty, Jack
    SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2021, 36 (02) : 405 - 425
  • [47] Personality and political preferences: The 2016 US Presidential Election
    Abe, Jo Ann A.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2018, 77 : 70 - 82
  • [48] Comparing voting methods: 2016 US presidential election
    Igersheim, Herrade
    Durand, Francois
    Hamlin, Aaron
    Laslier, Jean-Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 71
  • [49] Floating policy voters in the 2016 US presidential election
    Green, Jon
    ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2020, 67
  • [50] A Mathematical Model of Hacking the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Sjostrom, Dennis Nilsson
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 14TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBER WARFARE AND SECURITY (ICCWS 2019), 2019, : 277 - 286