Assurance of surgical quality within multicenter randomized controlled trials for bariatric and metabolic surgery: a systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Wiggins, Tom [1 ]
Jamel, Sara [1 ]
Hakky, Sherif [1 ]
Ahmed, Ahmed [1 ]
Markar, Sheraz R. [1 ]
Hanna, George B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
Y GASTRIC BYPASS; LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY; BODY-MASS INDEX; OBESE-PATIENTS; INTERNAL HERNIA; MORBID-OBESITY; WEIGHT-LOSS; OPEN-LABEL; INTERVENTION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2021.08.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Surgical quality assurance methods aim to ensure standardization and high quality of surgical techniques within multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs), thereby diminishing the heterogeneity of surgery and reducing biases due to surgical variation. This study aimed to establish the measures undertaken to ensure surgical quality within multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery, and their influence upon clinical outcomes. Methods: An electronic literature search was performed from the Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases to identify multicenter RCTs investigating bariatric and metabolic surgery. Each RCT was evaluated against a checklist of surgical quality measures within 3 domain: (1) standardization of surgical techniques; (2) credentialing of surgical experience; and (3) monitoring of performance. Outcome measures were postoperative weight change and complications. Results: Nineteen multicenter RCTs were included in the analysis. Three studies undertook pretrial education of surgical standard. Fourteen studies described complete standardization of surgical techniques. Four studies credentialed surgeons by case volume prior to enrollment. Two studies used intraoperative or video evaluation of surgical technique prior to enrollment. Only two studies monitored performance during the study. Although there were limited quality assurance methods undertaken, utilization of these techniques was associated with reduced overall complications. Standardization of surgery was associated with reduced re-operation rates but did not influence postoperative weight loss. Conclusion: The utilization of methods for surgical quality assurance are very limited within multicenter RCTs of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Future studies must implement surgical quality assurance methods to reduce variability of surgical performance and potential bias within RCTs. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bariatric Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 132
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In Response to A Systematic Review of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Head and Neck Oncology Surgery
    Langerman, Alexander
    Carlton, Daniel A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (10): : E353 - E353
  • [22] In Reference to A Systematic Review of the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Head and Neck Oncology Surgery
    Sun, Gordon H.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2015, 125 (10): : E352 - E352
  • [23] A Systematic Review of Power and Sample Size Reporting in Randomized Controlled Trials within Plastic Surgery
    Ayeni, Olubimpe
    Dickson, Lisa
    Ignacy, Teegan A.
    Thoma, Achilleas
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 130 (01) : 78E - 86E
  • [24] Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine on Quality of Recovery After Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Barbosa, Eduardo C.
    Ortegal, Guilherme H. P. C.
    Aguirre, Julia M.
    Costa, Paola R. R.
    Ferreira, Lucas N.
    Moreira, Laura F.
    Silva, Guilherme C.
    Ferro Filho, Pedro Paulo M.
    Ferreira, Diogo M.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (07) : 2663 - 2669
  • [25] Effects of deep neuromuscular block on surgical workspace conditions in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Aceto, Paola
    Perilli, Valter
    Modesti, Cristina
    Sacco, Teresa
    De Cicco, Roberto
    Ceaichisciuc, Ina
    Sollazzi, Liliana
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2020, 86 (09) : 957 - 964
  • [26] Prehabilitation for general surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Kovoor, Joshua G.
    Nann, Silas D.
    Barot, Dwarkesh D.
    Garg, Devanshu
    Hains, Lewis
    Stretton, Brandon
    Ovenden, Christopher D.
    Bacchi, Stephen
    Chan, Erick
    Gupta, Aashray K.
    Hugh, Thomas J.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (10) : 2411 - 2425
  • [27] Spin in the Scientific Literature on Bariatric Endoscopy: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Shirvani, Sayeh
    Rives-Lange, Claire
    Rassy, Nathalie
    Berger, Arthur
    Carette, Claire
    Poghosyan, Tigran
    Czernichow, Sebastien
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (02) : 503 - 511
  • [28] Spin in the Scientific Literature on Bariatric Endoscopy: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sayeh Shirvani
    Claire Rives-Lange
    Nathalie Rassy
    Arthur Berger
    Claire Carette
    Tigran Poghosyan
    Sébastien Czernichow
    Obesity Surgery, 2022, 32 : 503 - 511
  • [29] Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Padwal, R.
    Klarenbach, S.
    Wiebe, N.
    Birch, D.
    Karmali, S.
    Manns, B.
    Hazel, M.
    Sharma, A. M.
    Tonelli, M.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2011, 12 (08) : 602 - 621
  • [30] Do Authors Report Surgical Expertise in Open Spine Surgery Related Randomized Controlled Trials? A Systematic Review on Quality of Reporting
    van Oldenrijk, Jakob
    van Berkel, Youri
    Kerkhoffs, Gino M. M. J.
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Poolman, Rudolf W.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (10) : 857 - 864